Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Smirnov, S. A. The Structure of the Autopoiesis Act

Abstract: The article is devoted to the description of the phenomenon of a poetic expression as a special object action. For this purpose the author offers a new definition of the structure of poetical works as the autopoiesis act. Based on the creative work of Osip Mandelstam (in particular, his poems and ‘Conversation about Dante’) the researcher provides an analysis of the phenomenon of the poetical composition. The author offers a definition of autopoiesis as a model the entire act of the poetical composition is based on. The autopoiesis act itself is described by the researcher as an object action. The article was written at the confluence of poetics and anthropology. Research methodology is based on the introduction of terms from poetic anthropology as a branch of human philosophy into cultural practices of creating literary texts. The research is based on the principles and terms adopted from anthropology as an anthropopractice, in particular, understanding of the autopoiesis act as an object action aimed at generation and transformation of human based on creating an artwork. The novelty of research is attributed to the introduction of the model of autopoiesis based on which the author analyzes the phenomenon of a poetical composition from the point of view of a particular cultural practice and object action. For the first time the author offers the definition and description of the structure of the autopoiesis act. The research article was written within the framework of a new direction of interdisciplinary research – anthropopoetics that involve research and description of arts as anthropopractices of human transformation.

Keywords:

autopoiesis, structure of the autopoiesis act, anthropology of autopoiesis, creative act, object action, generative model, anthropopractice, ontology of poiesis, energy of the autopoiesis act, inner form.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropologii stikha. – Novosibirsk: NGUEU; ZAO IPP «Ofset», 2011. – 389 s.
2. Zamechu, chto avtopoezis kak porozhdayushchaya model', na osnove kotoroi prodelyvaetsya opredelennaya kul'turnaya praktika, otlichaetsya po svoim printsipam i ustroistvu ot modelei ekstazisa i mimezisa. Sm. ob etom podr. v rabote: Smirnov S.A. Avtopoezis cheloveka. Filosofskie ocherki po antropologii stikha. – Novosibirsk: NGUEU; ZAO IPP «Ofset», 2011. – S. 150 – 177.
3. Fakticheski opisaniyu etikh pretsedentov i posvyashchen sbornik moikh ocherkov po antropologii stikha: S.A.Smirnov, ukaz. soch. Cherez opisanie pretsedentov v kazhdom opyte polagaetsya eta ontologicheskaya ramka.
4. B.D.El'konin v odnoi iz svoikh poslednikh rabot takzhe vvodit gorizonty ontogeneza cheloveka – ontologicheskii, antropologicheskii i kul'turno-istoricheskii. Ontologicheskii gorizont oznachaet polaganie chelovekom sobstvennogo stanovleniya v bytii, kotoroe perezhivaetsya i prozhivaetsya kak Sobytie perekhoda Svoego i Inogo. I kogda chelovek perezhivaet eto sobytie, on zanimaet mesto v bytii, chto oznachaet antropologicheskii gorizont. Poslednii predpolagaet nakhozhdenie mesta sub''ektivnosti v Bytii i uderzhanie etogo mesta, uderzhanie sobytiinosti perekhoda. Chuvstvuetsya glubokaya soderzhatel'naya blizost' mezhdu nashimi predstavleniyami, dazhe v leksikone, sm.: El'konin B.D. Oposredstvovanie. Deistvie. Razvitie. – Izhevsk: ERGO, 2010. – S.253-255.
5. Khoruzhii S.S. Portret khudozhnika. // Chelovek.RU. Gumanitarnyi al'manakh. Otv. red. S.A.Smirnov. – Novosibirsk: NGUEU. – 2008. – ¹ 4. – S. 115 – 130.
6. El'konin B.D. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya (v traditsii kul'turno-istoricheskoi teorii L.S.Vygotskogo). – M.: Trivola, 1994. – 168 s.; El'konin B.D. Oposredstvovanie. Deistvie. Razvitie. – Izhevsk: ERGO, 2010. – 280 s.
7. Mandel'shtam O.E. Sobranie sochinenii v trekh tomakh. T. 2. Proza. – M.: TERRA, 1991. – S. 404.
8. Vydelenie etikh dvukh tipov, dvukh sostavlyayushchikh v poeticheskoi rechi sil'no napominaet vydelenie D.B.El'koninym dvukh tipov deyatel'nosti rebenka pri razrabotke im vozrastnoi periodizatsii: motivatsionno-potrebnostnoi (ovladenie otnosheniyami) i operatsional'no-tekhnicheskoi (ovladenie preldmetami). Pervaya fakticheski oznachaet smyslovuyu napravlennost' deistviya, vtoraya – orudiinuyu osnashchennost'. Perekreshchivanie v deistvii smyslovoi napravlennosti i orudiinogo osnashcheniya i zadaet sobstvenno predmetnost' etomu deistviyu. B.D.El'konin dobavlyaet, chto eta predmetnost' stanovitsya v samom akte osushchestvleniya predmetnogo deistviya: El'konin B.D., ukaz. soch.
9. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.363-364.
10. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.364.
11. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.368.
12. Akhutin A.V. Ponyatie priroda v antichnosti i v Novoe vremya (fyusis i natura). – M.: Nauka, 1988. – 208s.
13. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.374-375.
14. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.375.
15. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.376.
16. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.377.
17. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.382.
18. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.413.
19. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.412-413.
20. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.392.
21. Mandel'shtam O.E., ukaz. soch., S.391.
22. Mandel'shtam O.E. Slovo i kul'tura. Stat'i. – M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1987. – S. 162.
23. Mandel'shtam O.E. Sobranie sochinenii v trekh tomakh. T. 2. Proza. – M.: TERRA, 1991. – S.411.
24. Losev A.F. Dialektika tvorcheskogo akta (kratkii ocherk). // Kontekst – 1981. Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniya. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1982. – S. 48 – 78.
25. Losev A.F., ukaz. soch., S. 53.
26. Losev A.F., ukaz. soch., S. 60.
27. El'konin B.D. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya (v traditsii kul'turno-istoricheskoi teorii L.S.Vygotskogo). – M.: Trivola, 1994. – S.119.
28. El'konin B.D. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu razvitiya (v traditsii kul'turno-istoricheskoi teorii L.S.Vygotskogo). – M.: Trivola, 1994. – S.119-120.
29. El'konin B.D., ukaz. soch., S. 127-128.
30. El'konin B.D., ukaz. soch., S. 123.
31. Mandel'shtam O.E. Sobranie sochinenii v trekh tomakh. T. 2. Proza. – M.: TERRA, 1991. – S.182.
32. Sedakova O.A. Chetyre toma. Tom III. Poetica. – M.: Russkii fond sodeistviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 2010. – S. 99-112.
33. Sedakova O.A., ukaz. soch., S. 102.
34. Sedakova O.A., ukaz. soch., S. 102-103.
35. Sedakova O.A., ukaz. soch., S. 111-112.
36. Sedakova O.A., ukaz. soch., S. 112.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.