Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Poleschuk, O.V. Situation in the sphere of legalization of income attained by criminal means in accordance with the current criminal legislation

Abstract: The study concerns legalization of income attained by criminal means in accordance with the current criminal legislation. Attention is paid to the fact that several hundred thousand economic crimes are registered in Russia annually, and among these crimes tens of thousands of crimes are related to large and extra large criminal income (in 2010 – 51 969, in 2011 – 40 315, in 2012 – 36 083), which provides for their connection with “money laundering”. At the same time the correlation of these crimes and the crimes under the legalization of criminal income under Art. 174, 174.1 of the Criminal Code is just several per cent ( 3 per cent in 2010, 1,7 per cent in 2011, 1,4 per cent in 2012). Latent legalization of criminal income is related to the changing means of committing these crimes, complications with proving them, making revealing and investigation of such crimes difficult. In the opinion of the author the instability of criminal legislation and constant changes in the norms on criminal responsibility for the legalization of criminal income has a negative influence upon the use of proven preventive and interceptive measures against such crimes. The article contains analysis of practice and current legislation of Russia, allowing to use legal systems of credit and finances relations for the illegal purposes. Therefore, the investigation quality in the cases regarding legalization of criminal income, as guaranteed by revealing all circumstances, requiring proof, allows to uncover the factors facilitating money laundering and to solve the problems regarding destruction of the very economic basis for the crime, minimization of its development and reproduction. At the same time prophylactic measures are implemented both based on specific criminal cases, and upon the results of analysis of groups of cases, which is held in order to collect a wider range of information on crime and organization of activities of law-enforcement bodies in the sphere of fighting legalization of criminal profits. Improvement oft information guarantees also provides efficient means for fighting this type of criminal activities, since it allows for uncovering the sources for legalization of criminal income. To an extent, the Federal Financial Monitoring Service is an information and analytical body, which receives most of the information regarding suspicious deals and operations.


Keywords:

legalization of income, latency, counteraction, legalization factors, security, responsibility, damage, crime, transnational, economics.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noi sistemy protivodeistviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2014.-1.-C. 13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
2. Aslanyan L.S. Protivodeistvie legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovanii terrorizma. Rostov-na-Donu, 2014. S. 15-17. [el. resurs]: http://www.scienceforum.ru/2014/pdf/6685.pdf. Data obrashcheniya 12.04.2014.
3. Kiselev I.A. Gryaznye den'gi: Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za otmyvanie prestupnykh dokhodov i ee primenenie v bor'be s prestupnost'yu i korruptsiei. M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2009.
4. Kirilenko V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika legalizatsii (otmyvaniya) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk, Rostov-na-Donu, 2012. S.6.
5. Zhubrin R.V. Osnovy profilaktiki legalizatsii prestupnykh dokhodov: avtoreferat dis. … doktora yurid. nauk, M., 2013. S. 11.
6. Bash'yan N. A. Protivodeistvie organizovannoi legalizatsii dokhodov ot moshennichestva: Kriminologicheskii i ugolovno-pravovoi aspekty : avtoreferat dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 10.
7. Korchagin O.N. Administrativno-pravovye osnovy protivodeistviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Avtoreferat dis. kand. yurid. nauk., M., 2010. S. 8-9.
8. Korchagin O.N., Kolesnikov K.A. Organizatsiya protivodeistviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, v tom chisle ot nezakonnogo oborota narkotikov / Pod red. I.I. Batyrshina; uchebnoe posobie. M., 2013. S. 19..
9. Kocharyan A.M Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya mera protivodeistviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem: Avtoref. dis. … kand, yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 8-9.
10. Larichev V.D. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva o bor'be s «otmyvaniem» deneg, poluchennykh prestupnym putem // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. ¹
11. S. 100. 2.Aliev V.M. Legalizatsiya (otmyvanie) dokhodov, poluchennykh nezakonnym putem. Ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: Monografiya. M.: Institut sovremennogo prava, 2001. S. 16
12. Len'shin D.I. Ugolovnye nakazaniya za prestupleniya ekstremistskoi napravlennosti: problemy zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya i realizatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 38-42.
13. Panenkov A.A. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya natsional'noi sistemy protivodeistviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem, i finansirovaniyu terrorizma i oruzhiya massovogo unichtozheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.13-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2014.1.8110. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/etc/article_8110.html
14. Lopatina V.V.. Problemy narkotrafika i legalizatsiya narkotikov v Latinskoi Amerike // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10242
15. Ivanov A.G.. Legalizatsiya dragotsennykh metallov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem: problemy privlecheniya k ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.18
16. Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskie podkhody k resheniyu problem bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem i osobennosti prokurorskogo nadzora. Nekotorye predlozheniya po optimizatsii bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem na osnove nauchnykh issledovanii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.17-135. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.3.8754. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_8754.html
17. Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoi politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu yavlyaetsya zalogom uspekha obespecheniya federal'noi bezopasnosti Rossii, a takzhe bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-¹ 2.-S.188-236. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.90. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_90.html
18. Muradyan S.V. Institutsional'nye osnovy bor'by s finansirovaniem terrorizma v Evropeiskom soyuze // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.77-90. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.800. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_800.html
19. Panenkov A.A. Predvaritel'nyi analiz reagirovaniya pravookhranitel'nykh organov i spetssluzhb na prestupleniya terroristicheskoi napravlennosti v 2012 godu i prognoz na 2013 god v Rossii. Rezul'taty nauchnykh issledovanii 2010-2012 gg. po bor'be s istochnikami finansirovaniya terrorizma v Respublike Ingushetiya (vyvody i predlozheniya) // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.153-253. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.1.326. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_326.html
20. Panenkov A.A. Kriminologicheskaya obuslovlennost' gosudarstvennoi politiki po bor'be s prestupnost'yu-zalog uspekha v bor'be s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem v Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2012.-¹ 1.-S.1-54. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.109. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_109.html
21. Panenkov A.A. Bor'ba s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem ostanetsya aktual'noi i dolgovremennoi problemoi dlya Rossii // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.19-77. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.4.187. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_187.html
22. Malyshenko N.G.. Biznes-monitoring – sovremennyi instrument ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti federal'nogo avtonomnogo vuza // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.5.9556
23. A.A. Panenkov. Napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya bor'by s terrorizmom i ego finansirovaniem (po rezul'tatam provedennykh issledovanii) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/.2013.1.4806
24. Astanin V.V. Protivodeistvie korruptsii:
25. perspektivnye podkhody
26. k preduprezhdeniyu
27. i vozmeshcheniyu ushcherba // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 719 - 722. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9084.
28. Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub''ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 192 - 220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
29. Akopdzhanova M.O. Formirovanie sovremennogo zakonodatel'stva
30. Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti
31. za prestupleniya protiv ustanovlennogo poryadka
32. uplaty nalogov i sborov // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 8. - C. 1022 - 1026. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.8390.