Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Zutikov, I. A. The Balance of Interests between Tax Authorities and Taxpayers in the Russian Law

Abstract: The subject under review is the interaction between tax authorities and taxpayers in the process of performing tax obligations by taxpayers. Within the framework of the research the author offers his own term ‘balance of interests between tax authorities and taxpayers’. He defines it as the relation between mutually connected and balanced needs of the state in a taxpayer’s finances, on one hand, and desires and opportunities of a taxpayer to satisfy these needs, on the other hand, as well as the necessity to maintain this relation and balance within the legal framework. The author specifies the gaps in modern judicial method of resolution of conflicts between tax authorities and taxpayers including: 1) long period of dispute consideration; 2) the absence of sufficient regulatory system. The author also analyzes the problems of the process of conflict resolution including: 1) contradictions between the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and Civil Code of the Russian Federation; 2) conflicts between procedures in public law and private law; 3) possible establishment of administrative courts. In response to the aforesaid issues, the author offers the following solutions: to adopt a new codified procedural act at the legal level called Administrative Procedural Code and impose disciplinary and administrative responsibility on officials for committing tax violations that do not involve financial responsibility. The main research methods used in the article are: analytical method that allows to analyze the applicable legislation and judicial practice and comparative legal method that allows to compare the existing Russian and foreign legislations. The author provides the definition of his own term ‘balance of interests between tax authorities and taxpayers’ as ‘the relation between mutually connected and balanced needs of the state in a taxpayer’s finances, on one hand, and desires and opportunities of a taxpayer to satisfy these needs, on the other hand, as well as the necessity to maintain this relation and balance within the legal framework’ and offers to establish the public procedural legislation by the means of adopting the Administrative Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The author also offers to impose administrative and disciplinary responsibility on tax officials for committing tax violations. The author shares his opinion that revenue procedures should be simplified for individual ‘good faith’ taxpayers and, on the contrary, a more complicated procedure for tax payment and calculation should be established for persistent non-payers so that tax authorities could better control their activities or even exclude such payers from the category of good faith taxpayers. Noteworthy that the decision to include these or those taxpayers into the category of good faith taxpayers or to exclude them from that category should be still made by the Federal Tax Service.


Keywords:

tax, law, balance, taxpayer, tax authority, taxation system, taxation process, regulatory system, procedure, responsibility.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Konstitutsiya RF ot 12 dekabrya 1993g // Elektronnyy resurs : Rezhim dostupa http://www.consultant.ru/online/base/?req=doc;base=LAW;n=2875
2. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Chast' pervaya-chetvertaya: [Prinyat Gos. Dumoy 23 aprelya 1994 goda, s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na ot 23.07.2013g. ] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 05.12.1994, N 32, st. 3301.
3. Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Chast' pervaya i vtoraya [Prinyat Gos. Dumoy 16 iyulya 1998 goda, s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 23 iyulya 2013 g. ] // SZ RF. 3 avgusta 1998 g. N 31 st. 3824.
4. Arbitrazhnyy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Prinyat Gos. Dumoy 24 iyulya 2002g., s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 02 iyulya 2013 g. ] // SZ RF ot 29 iyulya 2002g. N 30, st. 3012.
5. Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Prinyat Gos. Dumoy 14 noyabrya 2002g., s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 02 iyulya 2013 g. ] // SZ RF ot 18 noyabrya 2002g. N 46, st. 4532,
6. Pimenova E.N.: «Problema sootnosheniya chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v rossiyskom arbitrazhnom protsessual'nom prave», Diss… kand. yurid. nauk… Saratov 2010g.
7. Karaseva E.D. «Razvitie metodologicheskogo instrumentariya, kontrolya nalogovoy nagruzki organizatsiy» Diss… kand.ekonom. nauk Yoshkar-Ola 2012.
8. Alimbekova A.S. « Problemy realizatsii nalogovo-pravovykh norm» diss… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov 2009.
9. Shchekin D.M.: «O balanse publichnogo, kvazipublichnogo i chastnogo interesov v praktike KS RF» Nalogoved. 2005. N 7. S. 12.
10. Shapovalov S.D. «Opredelenie "Nalogi+"» Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2005. 19 iyulya. N 24(515). S. 5.
11. Tolkovyy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka / pod red. G.N. Sklyarevskoy RAN Institut lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy. M; Astrel'. 2001g. 944 s. 5000 ekz.-ISBN 5-17-006948-0;-ISBM 5-217-01921-7.
12. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka / sost. S.I. Ozhegov pod red. L.I. Skvortsova M.; Oniks; Mir i Obrazovanie. 2011g. 1360 s. 7000 ekz.-27 izd. Ispr.-ISBN 978-5-488-02624-7;-ISBN 978-5-94666-606-0.
13. Novyy slovar' inostrannykh slov/ sost. E.N. Zakharenko, L.N. Komarova, I.V. Nechaeva. M; « Azbukovnik» 2008g. 1040s. 5000ekz.-3 izdanie ispr. i dop..-ISBN 978-5-903021-08-6.
14. Kinsburskaya V.A. Otvetstvennost' nalogoplatel'shchika za nepredstavlenie nalogovoy deklaratsii: spornye voprosy pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 17 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.1.558. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_558.html
15. Artem'eva Yu.A. Sravnitel'no-pravovoy opyt
16. sudebnoy zashchity nalogoplatel'shchika
17. v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 474 - 479.
18. Ivachev O.V., Korzun S.Yu. K voprosu o ponyatii nalogovogo pravonarusheniya
19. v administrativno prave. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 11. - C. 42 - 48.
20. S.V. Bartashevich Nalogovoe obyazatel'stvo: ponyatie,
21. mesto v sisteme nalogovo-pravovykh
22. yavleniy i otgranichenie ot smezhnykh
23. kategoriy nalogovogo prava // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 121 - 127. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.02.4.
24. Yu. A. Artem'eva Osobennosti pravovogo statusa
25. nalogoplatel'shchikov // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2012. - 2. - C. 13 - 18.