Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Mihailova, E.V. Problems of inheriting the right to participate in commercial organizations

Abstract: This article is devoted to one of the topical issues of inheritance – inheriting the right of a person to participate in commercial organizations. Since most of the commercial organizations in the Russian market are limited liability companies, the article is mostly devoted to the problems of implementation of rights of participants (promoters) of this category of economic entities. In spite of the stability of the legal regime of inheritance, one cannot say that all of the problems regarding the rights of the founders of the LLC may be resolved by turning to the text of Chapter V of Part III of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The article involved the methods of systemic analysis, formal logic, comparative method, method of teleological interpretation of the contents of norms of law in accordance with its goals, inheriting the rights of promoters (participants) of the LLC provides for the transition of a complex of proprietary and non-proprietary personal rights, and not just the real rights. While the modern civil legislation of Russia generally denies the principle of interpreting the silence of a person as an act showing his agreement, the claim of a heir to the promoters of the LLC directly without first getting a certificate of inheritance is not prohibited, and it obliges the promoters of the company to either agree or disagree with the claim of the heir. In the opinion of the author the silence of promoters should be interpreted as agreement.


Keywords:

inheritance, founder, participant, economic company, commercial organization, LLC, registered capital, testator, corporate law, civil legislation.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Lobutev A.V. Nekotorye problemy prinyatiya nasledstva pri nasledovanii prav na uchastie v kommercheskikh organizatsiyakh// Yurist VUZa Yanvar' 2010 str. 64-67
2. Tarasova I.N.. Dopustimost' sovmestnoi formy zaveshchaniya v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.7.8888.
3. Leonova O.A., Budylin S.L.. Rezidentnost' fizicheskogo litsa po nalogovomu zakonodatel'stvu Germanii i Rossii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.6.8924.
4. I. V. Zhemchuzhnikova. Nalogooblozhenie nekommercheskikh organizatsii: novovvedeniya, perspektivy i nereshennye problemy // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2011. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
5. Mikhailova E.V.. Nasledstvennaya pravosposobnost' inostrannykh grazhdan i obladatelei dvoinogo grazhdanstva // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10637.
6. V.N. Gavrilov. Oformlenie nasledstvennykh prav // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 2.
7. O. P. Psel. Pravovye problemy realizatsii printsipa edinoi sud'by zemel'nogo uchastka i raspolozhennogo na nem stroeniya pri ikh nasledovanii. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 1.
8. O. A. Kozhevnikov. Novye izmeneniya v zakonodatel'stvo o nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh: shag vpered i dva nazad // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
9. A. E. Zheleznyakov. Soderzhanie ponyatiya kommercheskogo banka s gosudarstvennym uchastiem // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
10. D. B. Lopatin. Problemy vybora i primeneniya prava v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – ¹ 5
11. Martynov A.V. Sovremennoe pravo i publichnoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii i sootnosheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie.-2013.-4.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4595.2013.4.924. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_924.html
12. Tarasova I.N. Dopustimost' sovmestnoi formy zaveshchaniya v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave // Pravo i politika.-2013.-7.-C. 876-879. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.7.8888.
13. Merryman J.H., Ownership and Estate (Variations on a theme by Lawson), 48 Tulane Law Review, 1974,
14. Gray J.Ch., Restraints on the Alienation of Property, 1883,
15. Hirsch A., Spendthrift Trusts and Public Policy: Economic and Cognitive Perspectives, 73 Washington University Law Quarterly, 1995,
16. Kerimov D.A. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. V 3 t. Tom 1. – M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Akademiya», 2007.
17. Yakovlev V.F. Chtoby dostich' rezul'tata, vazhno umet' idti na kompromiss. Interv'yu Internet-izdaniyu Zakon.ru Opublikovano v seti Internet po adresu: http://zakon.ru/Discussions/OneDiscussion/1763 21.12.2011.
18. Lyubimov D.S. Sotsial'naya i pozitivnaya yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'// "Politika i Obshchestvo" v ¹ 8, 2011 god str. 38-47)
19. Begunova N. Nasledovanie dolei v OOO // EZh-Yurist. 2004. N
20. Vetoshkina S.A. Osobennosti nasledovaniya prav, svyazannykh s uchastiem v kommercheskikh organizatsiyakh // Sovremennoe pravo.-M.: Novyi Indeks, 2007, ¹ 5.-S. 10-15
21. Il'in E.P. Psikhologiya voli. Sp-b., 2000.
22. Fat'yanov A.A. Volya kak pravovaya kategoriya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2008. ¹ 4.
23. Enikeev M.I. Osnovy obshchei i yuridicheskoi psikhologii. M., 1996.
24. Trotskii L. D. Predannaya revolyutsiya. M., 1991.
25. Tyutryumov I. M. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Pg., 1922.
26. Pakhman S. V. Obychnoe grazhdanskoe pravo v Rossii. SPb., 1879.
27. Brodel' F. Igry obmena. Material'naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm. XV–XVIII vv. T. 2. M., 1988.
28. Mikhailova E.V. Nasledstvennaya pravosposobnost' inostrannykh grazhdan i obladatelei dvoinogo grazhdanstva // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 233-238. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10637.