Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Gladysheva, O.V. Guarantees of lawful interests and rights of a victim in a criminal judicial proceedings in Russia: history and modern situation

Abstract: The object of studies concerns the works of renowned Russian, Soviet and post-Soviet procedural law scholars on the issues of the guarantees of lawful interests and rights of a victim in a criminal judicial proceedings. The author notes the need to implement guarantees in several directions: regarding lawful interests and rights of a citizen and rights of a participant of a criminal judicial proceedings. Limitations of rights in criminal judicial proceedings may be both lawful and unlawful. At the same time, the limitations of the rights of a participant of the criminal judicial proceedings may be solely illegal. The study is based upon the methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, as well as historical, formal legal, logical and comparative method. It is stressed in the article that incorrect scientific attitude towards normative regulation in part of guarantees of proprietary rights of a victim in the Russian pre-Revolution criminal judicial proceedings has its influence on the current attitude towards this procedural institution. The guarantees of rights of a victim, including the right of proprietary claims, requires more detailed studies of historical heritage, which should be carefully preserved as the basis for the system of legal guarantees in criminal judicial proceedings in the Russian Federation.


Keywords:

Charter, criminal, judicial proceedings, lawfulness, victim, rights, interests, limitations, citizen, participant.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sluchevskiy V.K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. V 2 ch. Ch. II. Sudoproizvodstvo / Pod red. V.A. Tomsinova. M., 2008.
2. Samoylova Zh.V. Protsessual'noe polozhenie grazhdanskogo isttsa na stadii pred-varitel'nogo rassledovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2013.
3. Viktorskiy S.I. Russkiy ugolovnyy protsess: ucheb. posobie. M., 1997.
4. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshch. ch. v 2 t. T. 1. Uchenie o prestuplenii: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. N.F. Kuznetsovoy i I.M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2002.
5. Erdelevskiy A.M. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda. M., 1996.
6. Azarov V.A., Suprun S.V. Okhrana imushchestvennykh interesov v sferakh operativ-no-rozysknoy i ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti. Omsk, 2001.
7. Boykov A.D. Zhertvy prestupleniy v Rossii, pravovye i sotsial'nye problemy ikh zashchity. Tret'ya vlast' v Rossii. V 2 kn. Kn. 2: Prodolzhenie reform. M., 2002.
8. Mel'nikov V.Yu. Garantii prav i zakonnykh interesov grazhdan v ugolovnom pro-tsesse. Rostov-n/D, 2010.
9. Cheprasov M.G. Zakonnye interesy obvinyaemogo i ikh realizatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Orenburg, 2012.
10. Yunoshev S.V. Problema obespecheniya prav poterpevshego zhdet svoego razresheniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2008. ¹ 1.
11. Azarov V.A. Problemy teorii i praktiki okhrany imushchestvennykh interesov lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Omsk, 1995.
12. Bozh'ev V.P. Uchastie poterpevshego na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. ¹ 15.