Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Skriba, A. S. Realism and Policy of Small States in the XXIth Century

Abstract: Conclusions made within the theories of realism show that against the background of reduced tension between strong actors of international policy, relations between countries with different potentials create different variants of distribution of power and influence in the world. Noteworthy that small states which subjective status has considerably grown over the past decade bring additional variety into international policy, on one hand, and do not allow excessive concentration of power, on the other hand. Basic models of state behavior remain traditional for the realism of the balancing and adjoining policy but they acquire specific features under modern conditions. The main specific feature is the implementation of a rather contradictory policy by small states. This policy is aimed at getting closer to the regional leader and keeping the distance and retaining the region’s freedom at the same time. It is very important to understand that the future confrontation of international environment depends on the results of such external political dualism.


Keywords:

political theory, theory of realism, neo-classical realism, balancing behavior, adjoining, small states, integration, economic relations, bilateral conflicts, modern Ministers of Defense.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Schweller R. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in // International Security 19:1 (Summer 1994).
2. Morgenthau H. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. Fifth Edition, Revised. —New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978. — 752 p.
3. Rose G. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy // World Politics – 1998-¹51.
4. Klaus rocks European Parliament // Euronews, 2009. http://www.euronews.com/2009/02/19/klaus-rocks-european-parliament/
5. Haass R. N. The Age of Nonpolarity. What Will Follow U.S. Dominance // Foreign Affairs. — 2008. — Vol. 87/3. — P. 44–56.
6. Ofitserov-Bel'skii D. Perspektivy obshchei vneshnei politiki ES // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – 2013 – ¹1. S. 122 – 131.
7. Romanova T.A. O neoklassicheskom realizme i sovremennoi Rossii // Rossiya v global'noi politike. — 2012. — ¹3.
8. Khrustalev M.A. Osnovy teorii vneshnei politiki gosudarstva – Moskva. – 1984. – 79 s.
9. Tsymburskii V. L. Narody mezhdu tsivilizatsiyami // Pro et Contra. – 1997. T. 2-¹ 3. – S. 170-174.
10. — S. 84–92. 3. Kondratov A. Mezhdunarodnoe povedenie gosudarstv // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. — 2011. — T.9. — ¹ 2(26).
11. Kortunov S. V. Sovremennaya vneshnyaya politika Rossii. M., 2008.
12. Kudryashova I.V. Legko li byt' srednevelikim // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. — 2008. — T.6. — ¹ 3(18).
13. Bordacheva T. V. Integratsiya i suverenitet v 21 veke (Doklad). – 2013. http://www.soyuzinfo.am/rus/analitics/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=325.
14. Kaveshnikov N.Yu. Malye i vrednye // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy — 2008. — T.6. — ¹
15. Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior / Ed. by Jeanne A. K. Hey. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.
16. Walt S. Alliances in a Unipolar World // World Politics —2009 — Vol. 61/1 — P. 86–120.
17. Walt S. The Origins of Alliances. — Cornell University Press, 1990. — 336 p.
18. Waltz K. Structural Realism after the Cold War // International Security — 2000. — Vol. 25/1. — P. 5–41.
19. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. — New York: McGraw Hill, 1979. — 256 p.