Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Lapaeva V.V. Privatization of socialist property as a constitutional and legal issue

Abstract: The problem of socialist ownership privatization inconsistency with the Constitution of the Russian Federation is considered in the following aspects: 1) Departure from the constitutional provisions on equality of citizens before the law and court; 2) Violation of the privatization legislation; 3) Unlawful (contrary to the legal principle of formal equality) nature of de-socialization of socialist property through its privatization. The author focuses on the analysis of the civilism concept, i.e. post-socialist social system based on the new form of personal (neither public nor private) property as a result of applying legal principle of formal equality in the process of de-socialization of socialist property. The author justifies the importance of this concept for the determination of constitutional and legal parameters of the social contract on property, without which it would be impossible to achieve normal economic, political and legal development of the country. This concept outlines the legal parameters of such de-socialization, allowing it to enter into the framework of the existing Constitution. Scientific potential of the concept allows defining the constitutional and legal contours of the social contract of property.


Keywords:

privatization, socialization, socialist property, constitution, the principle of equality, justice, civilism, Constitution of the Russian Federation, individual property, concept.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. G. A. Kolobova Rossiiskaya privatizatsiya kak politiko-
2. gosudarstvennyi mekhanizm preobrazovaniya
3. otnoshenii sobstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 13 - 22.
4. Tikhonov A.V. Pravovye aspekty upravleniya federal'nym
5. imushchestvom // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1150 - 1155. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.9448.
6. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Konstitutsionnye osnovy informatsionnoi svobody v Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 10. - C. 35 - 92. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9617.html
7. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. «Uvlechenie obshchimi mestami» i tsennostnyi komponent konstitutsionalizma // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 296 - 317. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_503.html
8. Barshchevskii M. Schastlivy neimushchie. Sudebnyi protsess Berezovskii-Abramovich. London, 2011/2012. M..2013. T.1. S.12. 6 Gadzhiev G.A. Printsipy prava i pravo iz printsipov // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2008. ¹2. 7. Glaz'ev S.Yu., Lokosov V.V. Otsenka predel'no kriticheskikh znachenii pokazatelei sostoyaniya rossiiskogo obshchestva i ikh ispol'zovanie v upravlenii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem // Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk. 2012. ¹7. 8. Zor'kin V.D. Sovremennyi mir, pravo i Konstitutsiya. M., 2010. 9. Zor'kin V.D. Pravo v usloviyakh global'nykh peremen. M., 2013. 10. Kanarsh G.Yu. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': filosofskie kontseptsii i rossiiskaya situatsiya. M., 2011. 11. Kashnikov B.N Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii. Novgorod. NovGU. 2004. 12. Lapaeva V.V. Voprosy prava v «Kapitale» K.Marksa. M., 1982 13. Lapaeva V.V. Rossiiskaya filosofiya prava v kontekste zapadnoi filosofsko-pravovoi traditsii // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. 14. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. T.23. S.726. 15. Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava // Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 2006. S.30-47. 16. Nersesyants V.S. Natsional'naya ideya Rossii vo vsemirno-istoricheskom progresse ravenstva, svobody i spravedlivosti. Manifest o tsivilizme. M., 2001. S.21. 17. Polikovskii A. K voprosu o kommunizme // Novaya gazeta. 22 noyabrya 2013. 18. Rolz D. Teoriya spravedlivosti. Novosibirsk. 1995. 19. Sinchenko G.Ch. Ot mitropolita Ilariona do N.A.Berdyaeva. Tysyacheletnii oksyumoron russkoi filosofii prava // Filosofiya prava. M., 2000. ¹1. 20. Shaio A. Samoogranichenie vlasti. Kratkii kurs konstitutsionalizma. M., 2001. 21. Pomerants G. Topaem vmeste // Novaya gazeta. 13.03-16.03 2008. S.23. 22. Chetvernin V.A. Predislovie k Ezhegodniku libertarno-yuridicheskoi teorii. 2009. Vyp.2 S.40. 23. Fromm E. Zdorovoe obshchestvo. M., Progress», 1990. (gl. Glava VIII. «Put' k zdorovomu obshchestvu» // Rezhim dostupa: gramotey.com›?open_file=1269078496 24. Fromm E.. Revolyutsiya nadezhdy. M., 2006. S. 223 i dr. Kanarsh G. Yu. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost': filosofskie kontseptsii i rossiiskaya situatsiya. M., Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2011. 25. Khaiek F. Pravo, zakonodatel'stvo i svoboda. M., 2006. 26. Yakovenko I., Muzykantskii A. Manikheistvo i gnostitsizm: kul'turnye kody russkoi tsivilizatsii. M. 2012. 27. Sproeder A. Stichword Zivilismus. Geschichtskonstruktion und politisches Programm in der Rechtsphilosophie von V.S.Nersesjavc // Hamburg. 2004. 28. Werner G. Das manische Schauen macht uns alle Krank // Stern. 2006. Vol.17.
9. Akhiezer A.S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika Rossii). T.1-2. Novosibirsk, 1997-1998.
10. Barenboim P.D., Gadzhiev G.A., Lafitskii V.I., Mau V.A. Konstitutsionnaya ekonomika // Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M. 2006.
11. Akhiezer A. Dumy o Rossii. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu. M., 1993
12. Arabov Yu. Ya vsego lish' za chestnyi razgovor s lyud'mi. Monologi dlya «Novoi». Znamenityi stsenarist i pisatel' zadaet voprosy vlasti i oppozitsii // Novaya gazeta. 2012. 7 dekabrya.