Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Savchin, M.V. Constitutional conforming interpretation of laws and supremacy of the Constitution

Abstract: The article is devoted to the specific features of constitutional conforming interpretation of the Constitution, based on systemic quality of law, harmonious and united character of the legal system. Conforming interpretation is a method for guaranteeing legal certainty, and it is one of the methods for overcoming gaps and conflicts in legislation. The basis of constitutional conforming interpretation is the idea of guarantees of implementation of constitutional norms as a directly applicable and efficient order, as well as polyvariety of application of constitutional provisions in the situation of lack of legal certainty. These factors are key to application of law and other normative acts only in those cases, when they meet constitutionality requirements. Based on comparative legal analysis, the author provides characteristic features of structure of constitutional conforming interpretation, which is defined by the object of legal regulation, administrative and judicial practice. The author formulates key approaches to overcoming legislative gaps and conflicts, which fail to meet the requirements of legal certainty, and they should be overcame by application of the norms of current legislation, which conform to constitutional values, norms, and principles.


Keywords:

supremacy of the Constitution, supremacy of law, conflict of laws, constitutional jurisprudence, constitutional justice, constitutional conforming interpretation, constitutionality, legal regulation, gap in the legislation, interpretation of the Constitution.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Birmontene T., Yarashyunas E., Spruogis E. General'nyi doklad XIV Kongressa Konferentsii evropeiskikh konstitutsionnykh sudov // Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie: Vestnik Konferentsii organov konstitutsionnogo kontrolya stran molodoi demokratii. Vypusk 2 (40) – 3 (41), 2008. Erevan : Tsentr konstitutsionnogo prava Respubliki Armeniya, 2008. S. 70 – 245.
2. Vei S. Printsipi konstituts³ino¿ ³nterpretats³¿ ³ samoobmezhennya konstituts³inogo sudd³ // V³snik Konstituts³inogo Sudu Ukra¿ni. 2002. ¹ 2. S. 57—59.
3. Velikii tlumachnii slovnik suchasno¿ ukra¿ns'ko¿ movi / Uklad. ³ golov. red. V.T. Busel.K.; ²rp³n' : VTF «Perun», 2002. 1440 s.
4. Gadzhiev G.A. Konstitutsionnyi printsip samostoyatel'nosti sudebnoi vlasti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. ¹ 2003. ¹ 1.
5. Geberle P. Zagal'n³ problemi konstituts³inogo prava ta yurisdikts³¿ konstituts³inogo sudu na mater³al³ «n³mets'ko¿ model³» ³ z poglyadu na Ukra¿nu // V³snik Konstituts³inogo Sudu Ukra¿ni. 2001. ¹6. S.59-72.
6. Gosudarstvennoe pravo Germanii. Sokrashch. perevod s nem. v 2-kh t. / Pod red. V.A. Tumanova. T. 2. M. : IGP RAN, 1994. 320 s.
7. Klyain Khans Kh. Yurisdiktsiya konstitutsionnogo suda i struktura konstitutsii. Ot pravovogo gosudarstva k konstitutsionnomu gosudarstvu // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. ¹
8. S. 111-112. 8.Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ¹ 29-P ot 20 dekabrya 2011 goda po delu o kompensatsii zatrat aviakompanii // http://www.rg.ru/2012/01/11/ks-avia-dok.html.
9. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ukrainy ¹ 4-rp/2020 ot 4 fevralya 2010 goda // http://ccu.gov.ua/uk/doccatalog/list?currDir=94600 (na ukr. yazyke)
10. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ukrainy ¹ 11-rp/2010 ot 6 aprelya 2010 goda // http://ccu.gov.ua/uk/doccatalog/list?currDir=106790 (na ukr. yazyke).
11. Rizhkov G. Printsip pravovo¿ derzhavi v Osnovnomu Zakon³ (Konstituts³¿) FRN ³ sudova praktika Federal'nogo Konstituts³inogo Sudu FRN. K. : Knigi dlya b³znesu, 2008. 112 s.
12. Savchin M. Priroda akt³v Konstituts³inogo Sudu Ukra¿ni: teoretiko-metodolog³chn³ aspekti // V³snik Konstituts³inogo Sudu Ukra¿ni. 2007. ¹5. S.71-78.
13. Slovnik ³nshomovnikh sl³v: 23 000 sl³v ta term³nolog³chnikh slovospoluchen' / Uklad. V.O. Pustov³t ta ³n. K. : Dov³ra, 2000. 1018 s.
14. Strizhak A.A., Ribalko Ya.V., Savchin M.V.Zakon Ukra¿ni «Pro Konstituts³inii Sud Ukra¿ni»: nauk.-prakt. koment.; za zag. red. A.A. Strizhaka. K.: ²n Yure, 2009. 328 s.
15. Tikhii V. Of³ts³ine tlumachennya Konstituts³¿ ta zakon³v Ukra¿ni Konstituts³inim Sudom Ukra¿ni // V³snik Konstituts³inogo Sudu Ukra¿ni. 1998. ¹ 4. S. 38 – 45.
16. Todyka Yu.N. Tolkovanie Konstitutsii i zakonov Ukrainy: teoriya i praktika: Monografiya. Kh. : Fakt, 2001. 328 s.
17. Shevchuk S. Osnovi konstituts³ino¿ yurisprudents³¿. K. : Ukra¿ns'kii tsentr pravnichikh stud³i, 2001. 294 s.
18. Shevchuk S. Sudova pravotvorch³st'. Sv³tovii dosv³d ³ perspektivi v Ukra¿n³. K. : Referat, 2006. 640 s.
19. F³losof³ya prav lyudini / Za red. Sh. ¥osepata ta ¥. Lomanna. K. : N³ka-Tsentr, 2008. 317 s.
20. Decision of Constitutional Conceil of French Republic 92-308 DC of 2 September 1992 // http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/root/bank_mm/anglais/a92308dc.pdf
21. Deutsches Staatsrecht. Ein Studienbuch von Reinhold Zippelius und Thomas Würtenberger. 31. Auflage des von Theodor Maunz begründeten Werkes. München : Verlag C.H. Beck München, 2005. 561 s.
22. Nales Pl. US 48/95 26.03.1996 roku o interpretace zakona v souladu s ustavnymi zakony a mezinarodnymi smlouvami dle ul. 10 Ustavy // http://nalus.usoud.cz/Search/ResultDetail.aspx?id=27983&pos=4&cnt=12&typ=result