Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Panokin, A.M. The procedure of considering a reported offenc in a criminal process

Abstract: The article concerns topical problems of considering a reported offence due to the amendments, which were introduced to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation by the Federal Law of March 4, 2013 N. 23-FZ. The author studies procedural status of persons taking part in procedural actions when a reported offence is considered and participants of such consideration. The author analyzes such verification activities as collecting explanations, samples for comparative studies, obtaining documents and objects, their seizure in accordance with the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, judicial expertise, etc. The author analyzes the Issue of use of the operative investigation activity results and other information obtained during the process of consideration of a reported offence as evidence. The author offers to reform criminal judicial procedure by cancelling the stages of institution of criminal proceedings, and unification of pre-trial proceedings, uniting preliminary investigation and inquiry.


Keywords:

reported offence, institution of a criminal case, verification activities, obtaining explanations, holding expertise, operative investigation activities, investigation activities, evidence, proof, unification of pre-trial procedure.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Tom II. Poryadok proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam po sovetskomu ugolovno-protsessual'nomu pravu. M., 1970. S. 517
2. Derishev V. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela-«relikt sotsialisticheskoy zakonnosti»//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. ¹ 8. S. 34-36.
3. Golovko L. V. Kazakhstan: desovetizatsiya ugolovnogo protsessa. Stat'ya 1. Otkaz ot stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela//Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 10-13.
4. Balakshin V. S. Ob'yasnenie kak dokazatel'stvo v ugolovnom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve//Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 5. S. 124-126.