Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Ponomareva, K.A. The foundations for the budget law liability in the Russian Federation and in the Federal Republic of Germany

Abstract: The object of studies includes social relations formed in the sphere of establishing and implementation of budget law liability in the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany from the standpoint of comparative legal studies. Through establishing common and specific features for these states, the author formulates the definition of budget offences. With the use of comparative method, the author establishes the differences between budget offences and other types of violations of budget legislation. Based upon the comparative legal study, the author analyzes similar problems in Russian and German legislation and searches for the optimum solutions. Based on the study the author makes the following conclusions. Both in Russia and in Germany liability for the offences in the budget sphere have a number of characteristic features typical of financial legal liability. It allows one to draw a conclusion on financial legal nature of this type of liability and to provide legal grounds for recognizing budget law liability as a type of financial legal liability. The distinction between budget offences and administrative offences may be drawn based upon the subject of the offence and procedural order for application of liability. The budget law responsibility defines the condition of the budget law subject, that is of a person, whose actions concern public finances, and who has to perform budget obligations, including public and private legal liability elements. The Budget Code of the Russian Federation should provide for a definition of budget offences and a closed list of budget offences. However, as comparative analysis has shown the definition of budget offence is absent in the legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany, including special legal acts on budget. Additionally, it is necessary to exclude the existing contradictions in the different Codes on liability for violations of budget legislation.


Keywords:

budget law responsibility, Germany, budget offence, sanction, comparative legal studies, the Budget Code, unauthorized use, judicial practice, budget funds, subject of an offence.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Arslanbekova A.Z. Problemy primeneniya otvetstvennosti za narushenie byudzhetnogo zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. 2006. ¹ 9.
2. Bakhrakh D.N., Krolis L.Yu. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' i finansovye sanktsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1997. ¹ 8.
3. Boltinova O.V. Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz stadiy rassmotreniya i utverzhdeniya federal'nogo byudzheta FRG i Rossii // Yuridicheskiy mir. 1998. ¹ 11 – 12.
4. Boltinova O.V. Konstitutsionnye nachala byudzhetnogo protsessa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Lex Russica. 2012. ¹ 3.
5. Butenko A.V. K voprosu o sushchnosti pravonarusheniy v oblasti byudzhetnogo zakonodatel'stva // Finansovoe pravo. 2007. ¹ 12.
6. Vitruk N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. M.: NORMA. 2009.
7. Emel'yanova E.S. Byudzhetnoe pravonarushenie i byudzhetnaya otvetstvennost': ponyatie i osnovnye cherty // Finansovoe pravo. 2004. ¹ 2.
8. Kommentariy k Byudzhetnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / pod red. E.Yu. Grachevoy. M.: Prospekt. 2009 g.
9. Krokhina Yu.A. Voprosy kontseptsii byudzhetnogo prava Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2002. ¹ 9.
10. Krokhina Yu.A. Finansovoe pravonarushenie: ponyatie, sostav i sanktsii // Finansovoe pravo. 2004. ¹ 3;
11. Makarova N.S. Byudzhetnaya otvetstvennost': ponyatie, osnovaniya i osobennosti realizatsii. Disc.: kand. yurid. nauk. M.: 2004.
12. Publichnye finansy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: novye podkhody k pravovomu regulirovaniyu // pod red. A.N. Kozyrina. M.: Tsentr publichno-pravovykh issledovaniy. 2007.
13. Sattarova N.A. O chasti chetvertoy Byudzhetnogo kodeksa RF // Finansovoe pravo. 2008. ¹ 3.
14. Skvortsov O.Yu. Voprosy mezhbyudzhetnykh otnosheniy v sudebno-arbitrazhnoy praktike // Byudzhetnoe pravo: voprosy teorii i praktiki. SPb. 2002. S. 70.
15. Smirnikova Yu.L. Neopredelennost' yuridicheskoy konstruktsii otvetstvennosti za netselevoe ispol'zovanie byudzhetnykh sredstv (sootnoshenie norm KoAP RF i BK RF) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2009. ¹ 4.
16. Tomilin O.O. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits za pravonarusheniya v finansovoy sfere. Avtoref. diss.: kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov:2003.
17. Shevchenko E.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' za narushenie byudzhetnogo zakonodatel'stva: Avtoref. diss.: kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk.: 2009.
18. Gröpl, NVwZ 1998, 1251 (1255); v. Selle, JZ 2008, 178 (180).
19. Hellermann, in: v. Mangoldt/Klein/Starck, GG III, 8. Aufl., Art. 104a Rn. 210.
20. Huber, Peter M., Klarere Verantwortungsteilung von Bund, Ländern und Kommunen?, in: Verhandlungen des 65. Deutschen Juristentages Bonn 2004, Bd. 1: Gutachten D, München 2004.
21. Modernisierung der Verwaltungsbeziehungen von Bund und Ländern: Gutachten des Präsidenten des Bundesrechnungshofes als Bundesbeauftragter für Wirtschaftlichkeit in der Verwaltung // Kohlhammer GmbH, Stuttgart, 2007.
22. Starck, Christian (Hrsg.), Föderalismusreform, München 2007.
23. Rojas, Luis Emilio: Grundprobleme der Haushaltsuntreu. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 2011. S. 132.