Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Nartsyssova, S.Y., Noskov, Y.M., Krupennikov, N.A, Matvienko, S.V., Kondratiev, V.S. Thinking as a personal development factor: modeling specific cogitativestyle features of argumentation.

Abstract: The authors of the article develop and discuss the conceptual model of cogitative-style determination of the argument. They provide the comparative cogitative style model, showing effect of cogitativestyle mobility, as well as specific features of the organization of psycholinguistic and psychosemantic studies, processing its results by the following methods of the sampling theory: with the use of contingency tables, with the use of χ2- Pearson criterion, with the dot-biserial coefficient of correlation of Pearson, univariate analysis of variance. The conclusions provided in the article were formed by the empirical research of interrelation between cogitative styles and features of the argumentation.


Keywords:

cognition, cogitative style model, cogitative style specific features, Mann-Whitney U-test, dispersion analysis, chi^2 criterion, empiric frequencies, theoretical frequencies, contingency tables, modeling


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Witkin H.A. Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins. Field Dependence and Field Independence / H.A. Witkin, D.R. Goodenough. New York, 1982.
2. Guilford J.P. Cognitive style: what are they? // Educational and Psychological Measurment. 1980. Vol. 40 (3).
3. Armstrong, S.J. The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education // Educational Psychology. 2000. Sep. Vol. 20. Issue 3.
4. Alloy L.V., Abramson L.Y., Whitehouse W.G. Depressogenic cognitive styles: predicitve validity, information processing and personality characteristics, and developmental origins // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1999. Jun.
5. Shkuratova I.P. Kognitivnye stili kak regulyatory mirovospriyatiya lichnosti // Pervaya rossiyskaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoy nauke. Tezisy dokladov. – Kazan': KGU, 2004, S.256.
6. Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual'nogo uma. SPb., 2004.-384 s.
7. Federal'nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g, ¹ 273-FZ.
8. Tolochek V.A. Stili deyatel'nosti: model' stiley s izmenchivymi usloviyami deyatel'nosti. M., 1992.-77s.
9. Sobchik L.N. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu individual'nosti. M.: Izd-vo: Institut prakticheskoy psikhologii, 2000.-512 s.
10. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psikhosemantiki.-Smolensk: SGU, 1997.-400 s.
11. Nasledov A.D. SPSS 19: professional'nyy statisticheskiy analiz dannykh. – SPb. Piter, 2011.-400s.
12. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya: analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh. Uchebnoe posobie. 3-e izd. – SPb.: Rech', 2007.-392 s.
13. Nartsissova S.Yu. Metodika diagnostiki kognitivno-stilevykh osobennostey argumentatsii: sushchnost', etapy provedeniya, rezul'taty // Nauka i sovremennost'-2011: sbornik materialov IKh Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / Pod obshch. red. S.S. Chernova. – Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo NGTU, 2011. S. 309.
14. Matvienko S.V., Dvoretskiy S.A. Statisticheskie metody v psikhologicheskikh i sotsial'nykh naukakh: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie // MO Shchelkovo: Izdatel' Markhotin, 2013.-194 s.
15. Baranov A.N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyy podkhod): Diss. ... dokt. filol. nauk.-M.:1990,-378 s.
16. Vasil'ev L.G. Argumentativnye aspekty ponimaniya.-M.: IP RAN, 1994.-222 s.
17. Berezina T.N. O vzaimodeystvii fizicheskikh i intellektual'nykh sposobnostey. // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika.-2012.-1.-C. 1-24. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2012.1.47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_47.html