Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Suleimanova S.T. Determination and Purposes of Punishment in Canadian Criminal Law

Abstract: Analysis of aspects and purposes of punishment is a very acute issue. According to it criminal law of Canada has special practical and theoretical interest. Success in reforms of criminal legislation of Canada should be examined attentively in view of possible implementation of Canadian positive experience. The author has used some special methods: historical and logical methods, case-method, based on documentary examination of criminal cases. The article examines the evolution of punishment purposes in Canada. Restorative justice is used actively in Canada. The basic purposes of punishment are constituted in the Criminal Code of Canada because of its reformation. The research is resulted in possibility of implementation of some Canadian regulations in Russian legislation.

Keywords:

Comparative law, punishment, restorative justice, purposes, respect of law, isolation, contribution of harm, criminal prevention.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vedernikova O.N. Teoriya i praktika bor'by s prestupnost'yu v Velikobritanii. M.: Rossiyskaya kriminolo-gicheskaya assotsiatsiya, 2001. 344 s.
2. Dunmey P. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava Kanady, Kitaya i Rossii // Pravo i politika. 2006. ¹ 2 // SPS «konsul'tantplyus».
3. Esakov G.A., Krylova N.E., Serebrennikova A.V. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. M., 2008. 336 s.
4. Israelyan E.V. Prava cheloveka vo vneshney politike Kanady // SShA Kanada ekonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2012. ¹5. S. 90-100.
5. Kabyshev S.V. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i zakonotvorchestvo: kanadskie podkhody // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 93-96.
6. Kant I. Osnovopolozheniya metafiziki nravov: soch.: v 8 t. M., 1994. T. 4. S. 536.
7. Karnozova L., Maksudov R., Flyamer M. Vosstanovitel'noe pravosudie: idei i perspektivy dlya Rossii // Ros-siyskaya yustitsiya. 2000. ¹ 11 // SPS «Konsul'tantplyus».
8. Petrushevskiy D.M. Pamyatniki istorii Anglii XI–XIII vv. M., 1936. S. 56–57.
9. Novgorodtsev P.I. Ob obshchestvennom ideale. M., 1991. 640 s.
10. Khatunov S.Yu. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v srednevekovoy Anglii (anglosaksonskiy, anglo-normanskiy, an-zhuyskiy periody): monografiya. M., 2003. 323 s.
11. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: uchebnik / pod red. I.D. Kozochkina. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2010. 1038 s.
12. Brudner A. In Defence of Retributivism // Retributivism and its Critics: papers of the special Nordic conference held at University of Toronto 25–27 June / Ed. By Wes Ley Cragg. Stutgart, 1992. P. 93–121.
13. Canadian Law Dictionary // URL: http://www.canadianlawsite.ca/Dictionary.htm
14. David W. Punishment: Consequentialism // URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ UMelbLRS/2010/2.html
15. Hirsch A., Bottoms A.E., Burney E., Wikstrom P.O. Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity: An Analysis of Recent Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999. 163 r.
16. Hughes P., Mossman M. Re-Thinking access to criminal justice In Canada: a critical review of needs, responses and restorative justice initiatives // URL: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/J3-2-2001-2E.pdf
17. Hogarth J. Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971. 432 r.
18. Latimer J., Dowden C.,Muise D. The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: a meta-analysis // URL: http:// www.d.umn.edu/~jmaahs/Correctional%20Assessment/rj_meta%20analysis.pdf
19. Lachambre S. La thorie de la dnonciation mergence et institutionnalisation en droit criminal // URL: http://www.ruor. uottawa.ca/fr/bitstream/handle/10393/20261/Lachambre_Sebastien_2011_these.pdf? sequence=1
20. Lipset S.M. The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Basic Books. 1963. 461 r.
21. Manning M., Sankoff P. Criminal law LexisNexis. Canada Inc., 2009. 1228 r.
22. Police-reported crime rate, Canada, 2000 to 2010 // URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2011001/ article/11523-eng.htm
23. Poole A.L. From Doomsday Book to Magna Carta, 1087-1216. Oxford, 1993. 446 r.
24. Rudell R., Winfree T. Setting Aside Criminal Convictions in Canada a Successful Approach to Offender Reintegration // The Prison Journal. 2006. Vol. 84. ¹ 4. r. 452–466.
25. Roach K. Essentials of Canadian Law. Criminal law. 2nd ed. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2000. 370 r.
26. Roberts J., Hirsch A. Sentencing Reform in Canada: Recent Developments // Revue generale de droit. 1992. ¹ 23. P. 334.
27. R.v. Proulx // URL: http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc5/2000scc5.html
28. Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa, 1987. 592 r.
29. Stuart D., Delisle R.J., Coughlan S. Learning Canadian Criminal Law 11th Edition. Toronto: Carswell, 2009. 1157 r.
30. Tweney G. Supreme Court of Canada Speaks on Conditional Sentences // The changing face of Conditional sentencing symposium Proceedings Ottawa: Dept. of Justice. Canada, 2000. 532 r.
31. Wright V. Deterrence in Criminal Justice Evaluating certainty vs. Severity of Punishment // URL: http://www. sentencingproject.org/doc/Deterrence%20Briefing%20.pd
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.