Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Knyazeva, E. N. Atomism and Holism in Modern Complexity Theory

Abstract: Atomism and holism are viewed as the two opposing but at the same time completing each other approaches in the modern theory of complex self-organizing systems (this theory is also called the ‘complexity theory’). Atomism is related to complex world structures and their fractal organization which bring us to elementary and further indivisible structural fragments that lie in the basis of complex space-and-time structures. Atomism refers to studying levels of existence and elements, parts and subsystems. At the same time, it is shown that the entire complexity theory is filled with holism and this holism often has an evolutionary nature. In evolution of complex self-organizing systems holism is associated with the appearance of emergence features of holistic structures and discreteness defined by a set of structures – evolution attractors. Modern atomism also refers to so called perception frames in cognitive science. Based on the system and evolutionary approach, the author offers certain arguments proving the hypothesis about the appearance of alphabetic writing and the teaching about atoms in physical nature (as introduced by A. Kozyrev and V. Lysenko).


Keywords:

perception frames, fractality, complex systems, continuity, linguistic hypothesis, holism, discontinuity, atomism, evolutionary epistemology, emergence.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alyushin A.L., Knyazeva E.N. Skorost' vospriyatiya // Voprosy filosofii. 2004. ¹ 9. S. 135-148.
2. Bergson A. Materiya i pamyat'. Sobr. soch. v 4-kh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Moskovskiy klub, 1992.
3. Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya evolyutsiya M.: KANON-press, Kuchkovo pole, 1998.
4. Kapitsa S.P. Skol'ko lyudey zhilo, zhivet i budet zhit' na zemle. Opyt istorii chelovechestva. M., 1998.
5. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Temporal'nye landshafty koevolyutsii // Chelovek. Nauka. Tsivili-zatsiya. K semidesyatiletiyu akademika V.S. Stepina. M.: Kanon+, 2004. S. 445-462.
6. Lysenko V.G. Universum vaysheshiki (po «Sobraniyu kharakteristik kategoriy» Prashastapady). M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2003.
7. Lysenko V.G. Proiskhozhdenie atomizma: lingvisticheskaya gipoteza. // Shabdaprakasha. Zografskiy sbornik. Vypusk 1 / pod red. Ya.V. Vasil'kova i S.V. Pakhomova. SPb.: MAE RAN, 2011. S. 99-112.
8. Ashby W.R. Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems // Cybernetica. 1958. Vol. 1. ¹ 2. P. 83-99.
9. Haken H., Knyazeva H. Arbitrariness in Nature: Synergetics and Evolutionary Laws of Prohibition // Journal of General Philosophy of Science. 2000. Vol. 31. P. 57-73.
10. Uexküll J.B. von. A Stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds // Instinctive Behavior. C. Schiller ed. N-Y.: International Universities Press. 1975. P. 30-31. [1st ed. 1934 in German].
11. Varela F.J., Thompson E., Rosch E. The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press, 1991 Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. (7th printing 1999).
12. Varela F. Quatre phares pour l’avenir des sciences cognitives // Théorie — Littérature — Enseignement. 1999. ¹ 17. Dynamique et cognition: nouvelles approches. P. 7-21