Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Bykov, V.M. Legal position of an investigator in a criminal process (Part 2).

Abstract: The article is devoted to the preliminary judicial control by the court over the procedural decisions and actions of an investigator. The author supposes that in some cases preliminary control of a court over procedural and investigative activities is not necessary, and consequent judicial control would be suffi cient in some cases.

Keywords:

investigator, investigative activities, control of a court, the Constitution of the Russian Federation, legislator, law, judicial practice, legality, guarantees.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Adigamova G. Z. Sledstvennye deystviya, provodimye po sudebnomu resheniyu i s sanktsii prokurora. Avtoref.
2. diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2004.S. 21.
3. Azarov V.A., Revenko N. I., Kuzembaeva M. M. Funktsii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i
4. praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya. – Omsk: Izd-vo Omgu, 2006. S. 69.
5. Antonova E. E. Funktsional'naya kharakteristika dosudebnogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse.
6. Avtoref. diss….kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2006. S.8.
7. Bozh'ev V. P. O sootnoshenii norm UPK RF, reguliruyushchikh protsess dokazyvaniya. //Materialy mezhdunar.
8. nauch. – prakt. konf. «Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: voprosy teorii, zakonodatel'stva,
9. praktiki primeneniya» (k 5-letiyu UPK RF).- M., 2007. S. 212-213.
10. Borodinov V. V. Nevostrebovannyy potentsial sudebnogo kontrolya. //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. ¹5. S.
11. 37-41.
12. Bykov V. M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RF i problemy raskrytiya prestupleniy (polemicheskie zametki).
13. //Pravo i politika. 2002. ¹9. S. 66-72.
14. Bykov V. M. Sudebnyy kontrol' za predvaritel'nym sledstviem. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2007. ¹1. S. 35-38.
15. Bykov V. Novyy zakon o zaloge kak mere presecheniya //Zakonnost'. 2010. ¹9. S. 26-30.
16. Zherebyat'ev I. V. Predmet sudebnogo kontrolya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. //Ugolovnyy
17. protsess. 2005. ¹10. S. 33-39.
18. Zherebyat'ev I. Sudebnyy poryadok vydachi razresheniya na proizvodstvo otdel'nykh protsessual'nykh deystviy.
19. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2005. ¹2. S. 85.
20. Izmaylov I. V. Sudebnyy kontrol' pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy bez sudebnogo resheniya. Ugolovnyy
21. protsess. 2005. ¹5. S. 33-36.
22. Kal'nitskiy V. «Sanktsionirovanie» i proverka sudom zakonnosti sledstvennykh deystviy v khode dosudebnogo
23. proizvodstva ne effektivny. //Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. ¹1. S. 73-75.
24. Karetnikov A. S., Arzamastseva K. A. Yavlyaetsya li deyatel'nost' suda po rassmotreniyu i razresheniyu khodataystv
25. dolzhnostnykh lits organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya sudebnym kontrolem? //Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2010. ¹4.
26. S. 68.
27. Korolev G. Reorganizatsiya dosudebnogo proizvodstva: problemy i perspektivy. //Zakonnost'. 2008. ¹1. S. 8.
28. Kuznetsova O. D. Sudebnyy kontrol' za deystviyami i resheniyami dolzhnostnykh lits organov rassledovaniya.
29. //Ugolovnyy protsess. 2005. ¹3. S. 25-27.
30. Nikiforov S., Bochkarev A. Provodit' obysk ili zhdat'? //Zakonnost'. 2005. ¹4. S. 37-39.
31. Serebrov D. O. Sudebnyy kontrol' za zakonnost'yu i obosnovannost'yu proizvodstva sledstvennykh deystviy,
32. ogranichivayushchikh konstitutsionnye prava i svobody lichnosti. Avtoref. diss… kand. yur. nauk. – Nizhniy
33. Novgorod, 2004. S. 5.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.