Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Ya.D. Zelmenis Institute of Prosecutors in the Republic of Latvia — the Need for more Strict Supervision and Protection of Individual Rights

Abstract: The author of the article describes the historical development of the institution of public prosecution in Latvia and the model of the prosecutor’s activity in Latvia today. The actual decisions and resolutions of the Constitutional Court of Latvia, the European Court of Human Rights and Court of Justice of the European Communities are researched. The author analyzes the problems associated with lack of supervision over the prosecutors’ activities and the inferior enforcement of individual’s rights, and suggests possible solutions to these problems.

Keywords:

comparative law, prosecutors, Latvia, the protection of individual rights, role of the prosecutor’s office, historical development of the institute of prosecution, the prosecutor’s office status in Latvia, control mechanism of prosecution in Latvia, recommendations of the European Council

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. A. Meikalisha. Prokuratura v Latvii. Riga, «Latvijas Vēstnesis», 2002.
2. Dodonov V.N., Krutskikh V.E. Prokuratura v Rossii i za rubezhom. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie / Pod red. k.yu.n. S.I. Gerasimova. M.: izd. Norma, 2001.
3. Levits E. Demokraticheskaya legitimatsiya normativnykh pravovykh aktov i delegirovannoe zakonodatel'-stvo: teoreticheskie osnovy // Likums un Tiesības. T. 4. 2002 ¹9 (37).
4. Monitoring SMI http://www.leta.lv/monitorings.php, agentstvo LETA.
5. Naskol'ko demokratichna Latviya? Monitoring demokratii 2005–2007 gg. — Kantselyariya prezidenta Lat-vii, 2007. (http://www.president.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_1586_Demokrat_monitorings.pdf) (pro-smotreno 03-05-2010).
6. Otchet General'nogo prokurora Yanisa Maizitisa o rabote prokuratury za 2007 god.
7. Torzhestvennaya rech' Ya. Maizitisa, posvyashchennaya 15-letnemu yubileyu prokuratury, http://www.lrp.gov.lv/ doc_upl/Maizisa_uzruna_23.09.05.doc (prosmotreno 08-04-2010).
8. Ukaz o dolzhnosti general-prokurora ot 27 aprelya 1722 goda, http://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/genprok.htm (prosmotreno 08-04-2010).
9. Yanis Maizitis. Pust' prokuror budet professional'nym, chestnym i nezavisimym. O rabote prokura-tury v proshedshem godu, «Latvijas Vēstnesis», 20.03.2004, http://www.politika.lv/index.php?id=4456 (prosmo-treno 28-05-2010).
10. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights / by P. van Dijk, G.J.H. van Hoof (third edition) — Kluwer Law International, 1998.
11. http://www.at.gov.lv/information/about-trials/2010/201002/20100209/ (prosmotreno 12-05-2010);
12. http://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/tiesa-lembergam-nodarits-moralais-kaitejums.d?id=24124641 (prosmo-treno 12-05-2010) Normativnye akty: 1. Zakon o prokurature. 2. Zakon o prokurature SSSR. (http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;div=LAW;base=ESU;n=1625 (prosmotreno 08-04-2010). 3. Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990, http://www.unhchr.ch/html/ menu3/b/h_comp45.htm (prosmotreno 12-05-2008). 4. Explanatory Memorandum. Reccomendation Rec 2000 (19) of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the role of public prosecution in the criminal justice system. 5. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=Rec(2000)19&Language=lanEnglish&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999 CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75 (prosmotreno 28-03-2010). 6. Prosecution Guidelines. Crown Law Office, 1992, str. 15-16. http://www.crownlaw.govt.nz/artman/docs/ article_159.asp (prosmotreno 30-04-2008). Resheniya i postanovleniya: 1. Reshenie ESPCh po delu «FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM». 2. Reshenie ESPCh po delu «O’HARA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM». 3. Reshenie ESPCh po delu «FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM». 4. Reshenie ESPCh po delu «FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM». 5. Reshenie ESPCh po delu «BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM». 6. Reshenie Suda Evropeiskogo Soobshchestva ot 26 iyunya 2007 g. po delu C‑305/05. 7. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo suda ot 20 dekabrya 2006 g. po delu ¹ 2006-12-01. 8. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo suda ot 16 oktyabrya 2006 g. po delu ¹ 2006-05-01. 9. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo suda ot 21 noyabrya 2005 g. po delu 2005-03-0306. 10. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo suda ot 24 marta 2000 g. po delu ¹ 04-07(99). 11. Reshenie Konstitutsionnogo suda ot 1 oktyabrya 1999 g. po delu ¹ 03-05(99). 12. Reshenie ot 23 fevralya 2006 g. po delu ¹ 2005-22-01
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.