Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Prokofiev, A. V. (2011). Non-Violence Ethics as an Escape from the Moral Risk. Philosophy and Culture, 7, 137–149. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58532
Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Prokofiev, A. V. (2011). Non-Violence Ethics as an Escape from the Moral Risk. Philosophy and Culture, 7, 137–149. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58532
Prokofiev, A. V. Non-Violence Ethics as an Escape from the Moral RiskAbstract: The article well shows that a traditional claim against non-violence ethics disguising simple helplessness and cowardice is beneath any criticism. However, imperative non-violence can hide a spiritual and psychological pragmatics of another kind – intention of a subject to avoid any risks in the sphere of moral improvement. The author of the article assumes that non-violence ethics is indeed an escape from the moral risk, and this tendency ruins the basic moral about sincere starvation towards the other person’s well-being. This study is based on such concepts as L. N. Tolstoy’s moral doctrine and M. Weber’s phenomenology. Keywords: philosophy, ethics, morals, duty, responsibility, perfection, non-violence, risk, L.N. Tolstoy, M. Weber.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 644-705.
2. Guseynov A. A. Etika nenasiliya // Voprosy filosofii. 1992. ¹ 3. S. 72-82. 3. Il'in I.A. O soprotivlenii zlu siloy // Il'in I.A. Put' k ochevidnosti. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 6-175. 4. Kant I. Osnovanie metafiziki nravov // Kant I. Lektsii po etike. M.: Respublika, 2000. S. 224-283. 5. Nitsshe F. K genealogii morali // Nitsshe F. Soch. v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 407-524. 6. Prokof'ev A.V. Vybor v pol'zu men'shego zla i problema granits moral'no dopustimogo // Eticheskaya mysl': Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 9. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 122-145. 7. Prokof'ev A.V. Dolzhenstvovanie i vozmozhnost' // Voprosy filosofii. 2003. ¹ 6. S. 69-83. 8. Prokof'ev A.V. Kant, obman, primenenie sily… // Logos: filosofsko-literaturnyy zhurnal. ¹ 5 (68). 2008. S. 60-90 9. Solov'ev V.S. Tri razgovora o voyne, progresse i kontse vsemirnoy istorii // Solov'ev V.S. Sochi-neniya v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1988. S. 635-763. 10. Tolstoy L.N. Zakon nasiliya i zakon lyubvi // Tolstoy L.N. Poln. sobr. soch. v 91-m tt. T. 37. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1956. C. 149-121. 11. Tolstoy L.N. Tsarstvo Bozhie vnutri vas // Tolstoy L.N. Poln. sobr. soch. v 91-m tt. T. 28. M.: Khudo-zhestvennaya literatura, 1957. C. 1-293. 12. Shveytser A. Kul'tura i etika. M.: Progress, 1973. 328 c. 13. Breiner P. Max Weber and Democratic Politics. L.: Sornell University Press, 1996. 237 p. 14. Foot P. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect // Foot P. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. P. 19-32. 15. Hare R.M. Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981. 242 p. 16. Lockhart T. Moral Uncertainty and Its Consequences. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2000. 227 p. 17. Ross W. D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. 183 p |