Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of the role of question-answer procedures in modern communication conditions. The subject of the study is question-answer procedures. The article explains one of the main distinctions for the topic of the study - the concepts of "ignorance" and “lack of knowledge”. Particular attention is focused on identifying and clarifying the role of the question in modern communication: the characteristics / attributes of the question in modern communication are identified; logical and rhetorical aspects of questions are analyzed; the key concept of "interrogative" for the formal description of questions in logic is clarified; the specificity of the logical basis of the question is shown; the difference between logical and grammatical subjects and predicates is shown; cognitive and manipulative functions of questions are formulated. The article clarifies the meaning of the concept of "communicative goal", and also proposes a variant of dividing questions into correct and incorrect depending on the communicative goal. The article proposes a classification of incorrect questions and a method for answering questions of different types in both personal and professional communicative interaction; general recommendations for response procedures are provided, and types of correct and incorrect answers are demonstrated and analyzed.
The article uses methods of comparative and contextual analysis, generalization, classification, and the logical method. The text is accompanied by visual, expressive examples, which allows the reader to better understand the main ideas of the study. The article will be useful for both students, postgraduates studying rhetoric, argumentation theory, communication techniques, and a wide range of readers.

Abstract: The subject of the study is critical thinking. The article is devoted to the study of the role of critical thinking in modern communication conditions. Particular attention is paid to the peculiarities of using critical thinking skills in countering manipulative influences both in the professional sphere and in personal communicative interaction. The article substantiates that critical thinking is one of the most important skills in the modern world; the importance of critical thinking skills for effectively processing large amounts of incoming information, as well as for building successful communication, is clarified; the specifics and features of the application of critical thinking skills in the context of communicative interaction are considered; the role of logical as well as rhetorical components in communication is substantiated; options for countering communicative manipulations and incorrect communicative influences are proposed. The article uses methods of comparative analysis, contextual analysis, synthesis, generalization, classification, as well as the logical method. The article proposes a division of communicative goals according to the type of statements. Particular attention is focused on analyzing the situation of the motivating communicative goal. The article clarifies the meaning of the following concepts: communication, 4K competencies, critical thinking, non-critical thinking, manipulation, logical, psychological and rhetorical argumentation strategies, communicative purpose, rhetoric, ad hominem arguments, ad rem arguments, deductive inferences, inductive inferences. The article proposes methods and tools for strengthening the skills of building effective communicative interaction. Methods of countering manipulative communicative influences are also analyzed both from the point of view of logical science and rhetorical skill. The article will be useful for both undergraduate and graduate students studying rhetoric, argumentation theory, communication techniques, and a wide range of readers.

Abstract: For all years of judgment of a problem of creativity of people faces a number of problems: who acts as the subject of creativity, is creativity conscious process, or originates in the unconscious; from where the person scoops resources for creativity; what criteria of an assessment of creative process, whether creativity and if it is possible how is possible to measure? In article it is about a role of logical and intuitive aspects in the course of creating scientific work on the example of classical science. In this article the author uses the following methods of research: comparative and historical analysis, analogy, classification, generalization, synthesis. In article it is shown that in the course of scientific creativity logiko-rational and intuitive aspects mutually supplementing each other form uniform harmonous system. And if by means of logical tools the scientist accumulates and develops knowledge that allows to make continuous and uniform motion to certain results, thanks to intuition and the intellectual sensitivity accompanying it there is a transfer of information in area realized, the interpretation of images promoting specification and justification of the theory in general; break as a result of the saved-up experience/knowledge.