Abstract: The article is devoted to the literature that played the leading role in the development of socialist culture. Base on the analysis of creative writing by Z. Batotsyrenov, Ts. Don, S. Tuy and B. Baradin the researcher demonstrates peculiarities of the development of the Buryat literature in the 1920 - 1930s. Amgalanova emphasizes that the artistic movement of the after-revolutionary decade generally tried to fundamentally change the cultural life of the society by the means of re-evaluation of aesthetic vlues of traditional arts. Those changes included psychological realism, everyday writing style, and drawing from nature. In the 1930s ideological and political beliefs played the leading role in the development of artistic culture. The methodological basis of the research implies historical cultural approach, the main methods of the research are axiological, retrospective, and narrative methods. In conclusion, the author states that the main purpose of socio-humanitarian research is to perform an objective analysis of the repressive policy of the Soviet state, mainly reconstruction and return of the names of the workers of culture and science and their heritage to the artistic and academic environment. 

Abstract: The article is devoted to the place and role of ideology in the national and cultural construction of the late 1920's - early 1930's. The subject of the research is the views and opinions as well as social, political and cultural activity of the Buryat intelligentsia that was understood as counter-revolutionary and was conceptualized with such ideologemes as 'borgeous nationalism' or 'pan-mongolism'. As an example, the author of the article analyzes newspaper articles that had a prescriptive nature and required 'self-criticism' from cultural activists. The methodological basis of the research implies the historical-cultural approach, the main methods are historical-cultural, retrospective and narrative. The results of the research demonstrate that when the Buryat culture, national by form and socialist by content, was being formed, it implied those elements of the cultural heritage that were officially understood as 'feudal religious carry-overs' of the exploitative class. Consequently, those who transmitted or translated such ideas, were withdrawn from the socio-cultural space. Pre-revolution Buryat intelligentsia was viewed by the ruling power as an oppositional social group. That had a tragic effect on its status. 

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of that special role that was assigned to the development of national literature and writers as part of the cultural construction of regions. The subject of the research is the main trends in the development of the national Buryat literature of the 1920s which had been considered to be the literature with a recent system of writing for quite a long time. The author emphasizes the being one of the most important forms of social conciousness, literature has always reflected live styles and world views of people in this or that historical period. The author focuses on the development of the genre system of the Buryat literature. The methodological basis of the research includes the historical cultural approach, the main methods are axiological and narrative. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that Buryat researchers mostly focus on the descriptive analysis of literary works without focusing on visions, thoughts and feelings of writers that reflected social, political, economic and historical-cultural trends in the development of the 'new' Buryat culture. The main conclusion of the research is that the first after-revolution decade of the history and culture of Buryatia was one of the most dynamic periods when conditions for formation and development of the national literature were created.