Reference:
Topilina T..
Provision of the access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation
// Legal Studies. – 2021. – № 10.
– P. 37-48.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2021.10.36737.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2021.10.36737
Read the article
Abstract: This article analyzes the problems of exercising the right of access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation. The author examines the legislation of post-Soviet countries in terms of provision the access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation. The subject of this research is the norms of Russian and foreign legislation that regulate to right of access to justice in criminal proceedings. The object of this research is the legal relations that emerge in implementation of the right of access to justice. It its demonstrated that the restriction on access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation instance is the time constraint for filing cassation appeal for the convict; and for consideration of interlocutory court decisions – the procedure for assessing cassation appeal without holding a court hearing. The conclusion is substantiated on the need to waive the time constraint for filing cassation appeal for the convict against final court decisions that have entered into force, and for consideration of interim court decisions, the procedure for assessing cassation appeal against the interlocutory court decision should be eliminated without holding a court hearing.
Keywords: cassation appeal, criminal procedural disputes, cassation instance, cassation proceedings, right to appeal, access to court, criminal process, access to justice, limitation of right, securing the right
References:
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 20.07.2004 «Delo "Nikitin (Nikitin) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii» (zhaloba № 50178/99) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Kostanov Yu.A. Presekatel'nyy srok dlya sploshnoy kassatsii. Kriticheskiy vzglyad na predlozhenie VS RF // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2020. № 7. S. 88-93.
Borodinova T.G. Institut peresmotra prigovorov v sovremennom ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: diss. dokt. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09 /
Borodinova Tat'yana Gennad'evna. – M., 2016. S. 272.
Davydov V.A. Srok obzhalovaniya v kassatsionnom proizvodstve: vzglyad razrabotchikov zakonoproekta o popravkakh v UPK // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2020. № 9. S. 22-27.
Kudryavtseva A.V., Spiridonov M.S. Ob ogranichenii sroka kassatsionnogo obzhalovaniya prigovora // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2020. № 1. S. 123-126.
Plashevskaya A.A. Deystvie revizionnogo nachala pri obnaruzhenii oshibki v prigovore pri apellyatsionnom i kassatsionnom peresmotrakh v sootvetstvii s FZ ot 29 dekabrya 2010 g // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya Rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti / Otvetstvennye red
Reference:
Konovalov A.O..
Topical problems of protection of an infringed right to access information on activities of the courts in the Russian Federation
// Legal Studies. – 2013. – № 7.
– P. 100-124.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.9008.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.9008
Read the article
Abstract: The article contains the study of current legislation of the Russian Federation regulating the legal relations regarding implementation of various means of protection of a constitutional right to access information on activities of the courts: administrative control, prosecutor supervision and judicial mechanism. The author distinguishes the competences of the chairpersons of Supreme Courts of the Republics, and regional courts, the courts of the cities of federal significance., courts of autonomous regions and districts, and chairmen of the city (district) courts in the sphere of administrative control. The author also provides legal characteristics of use of supervisory competence of the prosecution, and studies the procedural specific features of use of the judicial protection mechanism. The author provides critical analysis of the existing judicial and supervisory practice, taking the Novosibirsk Regional Court as an example. He also defines the key directions for the improvement of current legislation in the sphere of protection of the right to access information on the activities of the courts in the Russian Federation.
Keywords: court, jurisprudence, access to information, challenging, Constitution, prosecution, law, judge, supervision, protection
References:
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 11.01.1995 № 32 «O gosudarstvennykh dolzhnostyakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 1995. № 11-12.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Soveta sudey RF ot 21.06.2010 №229 «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o poryadke rassmotreniya sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii postupayushchikh v elektronnoy forme obrashcheniy grazhdan (fizicheskikh lits), organizatsiy (yuridicheskikh lits), obshchestvennykh ob'edineniy, organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i (ili) organov mestnogo samoupravleniya» // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tant Plyus» 2013.
Opredelenie Sovetskogo rayonnogo suda Novosibirskoy oblasti ot 26.12.2012 po materialu № M-2803/2012..
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10.02.2009 №2 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya) organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti, organov mestnogo samoupravleniya, dolzhnostnykh lits, gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh sluzhashchikh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2009. № 4.
Opredelenie Berdskogo gorodskogo suda Novosibirskoy oblasti ot 12.12.
Reference:
Bakradze A.A..
Criminal law analysis of the Draft Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On Judicial Practice on Cases of Bribery, Commercial Bribery and other Corruption Offences"
// Legal Studies. – 2013. – № 5.
– P. 165-180.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.793.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.793
Read the article
Abstract: The author of the article holds Criminal law analysis of the Draft Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On Judicial Practice on Cases of Bribery, Commercial Bribery and other Corruption Offences", and based upon the results of his study he provides some critical comments. In particular, criminal responsibility for bribery cannot take place no matter whether acts (failure to act) were premediated by bribe or agreement with an official on provision of bribe for an act. The author offers to qualify receipt of part of valuables or starting to perform proprietary services as an attempted bribery (commercial bribery) in the amount provided by the intent of a perpetrator. Receipt of money, stock shares and other property by an official or a manager of a commercial or other organization for taking acts (failure to act) in the sphere of its competence, or which he could have taken using his official position may not be regarded as bribe (commercial bribe) no matter whether he was intending to take these acts (fail to act). The article provides some further critical notes, which are aimed at optimizing the law-enforcement activity.
Keywords: corruption, bribery, commercial bribery, corruption crimes, misappropriation, waste, forgery by an official, extortion, theft, proprietary harm
References:
Bakradze A.A. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii moshennichestv: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze. – M.: Akademiya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD Rossii, 2011. S. 135-137.
V.I. Gladkikh, P.V. Fedotov, R.N. Shumov. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie prestupleniy, sovershaemykh na rynke nedvizhimosti. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyy yuridicheskiy institut. M., 2010 – 9,0 p.l.
V.I. Gladkikh, I.V. Vlasova, R.N. Shumov. Protivodeystvie prestupleniyam, sopryazhennym s prinuzhdeniem k soversheniyu sdelki ili k otkazu ot ee soversheniya. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyy yuridicheskiy institut. M., 2010 – 9, 25 p.l.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestupleniy, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze.-M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2011. S. 380.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoy okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestupleniy, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem. Avtoref. diss. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011. S. 13.
Bakrad
Reference:
Markov P.V..
Conditions for the exercise of judicial discretion in сontinental and common law countries
// Legal Studies. – 2012. – № 4.
– P. 73-107.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318
Read the article
Abstract: The article deals with the specific features of judicial discretion within the framework of civil law (continental) and common law (Anglo-Saxon) legal systems. The definitions of judicial discretion and of the conditions for its exercise are formulated. The author puts forward the theory of two models of judicial discretion which differ from each other with regard to such matters as 1) functioning of judicial system; 2) hierarchy of sources of law; 3) practice of application of various means of interpretation of the legal rules; 4) development of legal doctrine; 5) adaptation of legal transplants; 6) characteristics of national legal systems.
Keywords: judicial discretion, judicial norm-making, abuse of discretion, discretion model, legal family , legal system, Code, precedent, interpretation of law, constitutional justice
References:
Duff D. The Federal Income Tax Act and Private Law in Canada: Complementarity, Dissociation, and Canadian Bijuralism // Canadian Tax Journal. 2003. Vol. 51. № 1. R. 51.
Hogg P., J. Magee, Cook T. Principles of Canadian Tax Law. Scarborough, Carswell, 1999. P.2.
Zweigert K., Puttfarken H.-J. Statutory Interpretation – Civilian Style // Tulane Law Review. 1970. Vol. 44. P. 715-716, fn. 32.
Zweigert K., Puttfarken H.-J. Statutory Interpretation – Civilian Style // Tulane Law Review. 1970. Vol. 44. P. 707.
Zweigert K., Puttfarken H.-J. Statutory Interpretation – Civilian Style // Tulane Law Review. 1970. Vol. 44. P. 706-707.
Zander M. The Law-Making Process. Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. 130-131.
Yudin Yu. A., Shul'zhenko Yu. L. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v federativnom gosudarstve (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie). M., 2000. S. 5-6.
Marchenko M. N. Istochniki prava. M., 2006. S. 510.
Hahn H. Trends in the Jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court // American Journal of C
Reference:
Nikiforova A.V..
Legal positions of bodies of the constitutional justice on territorial organization of local government
// Legal Studies. – 2012. – № 1.
– P. 69-91.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.29.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.29
Read the article
Abstract: In this article author examines legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and constitutional courts of constituent subjects of Russian Federation on territorial organization of local government. Then the author offers some options of their classifications. The author also studies direct and indirect influence of these legal positions on improvement of legislation on territorial organization of local government and influence on the legislators.
Keywords: territorial organization, municipal self-government, legal positions, legislation, influence, development, constitutional courts, Ustav courts, decisions, resolutions
References:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 26 noyabrya 1996 goda №138-FZ «Ob obespechenii konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii izbirat' i byt' izbrannymi v organy mestnogo samoupravleniya»/ [Elektronnyy resurs] – Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
P. 3, st. 13 Federal'nogo zakona ot 28 avgusta 1995 goda № 154-FZ «Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii»/ [Elektronnyy resurs] – Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie Ustavnogo Suda Kaliningradskoy oblasti ot 25 maya 2007 g. №1-P «Po delu o sootvetstvii Ustavu (Osnovnomu zakonu) Kaliningradskoy oblasti Zakonov Kaliningradskoy oblasti ot 5 noyabrya 2004 goda № 437/ [Elektronnyy resurs] – Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie Ustavnogo Suda Kaliningradskoy oblasti ot 10 avgusta 2007 №4-P/ [Elektronnyy resurs] – Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 3 noyabrya 1997 g. № 15-P «Po delu o proverke kons