Bagautdinov R.R. —
Civil process principles in the context of unification of civil and arbitration proceedings in the Russian Federation
// Legal Studies. – 2017. – № 4.
– P. 1 - 7.
Read the article
Review: The paper analyzes the problem of unification of civil and arbitration proceedings in the Russian Federation caused by the absence of due attention to procedural principles, the need for their harmonization, and provision of their coherence. The author suggests considering these principles in a whole, taking into account the social and liberal concepts applied to material and procedural law. The author points at the theses about “differentiation” and “imbalance” of legal regulation and the necessity to level the negative consequences of these phenomena when preparing the unified civil proceedings code of the Russian Federation. The research methodology is based on general scientific and specific research methods: the dialectical method, the method of formal logic, the formal-legal method, analysis and synthesis, the comparative-legal, system and historical methods. The author concludes that there exist integrative processes, promoting unification of civil and arbitration provisions, and the factors determining the specification of provisions as a result of evolution of the structure and the content of legal regulation of particular procedural relations expressed in the concepts of “differentiation” and “imbalance”. The author suggests using the procedural principles, their coherence and belonging to a certain concept, as a means of harmonization and minimization of collisions. The author formulates the criterion for the systematization of the principles in order to restrict the context regulation of particular procedural relations.
Keywords: procedural law reform, specificity of procedural principles, imbalance of procedural provisions, differentiation of procedural provisions, principles of civil proceedings, systematization, harmonization of procedural law, civil proceedings, simplification of procedural provisions, contextuality of procedural principles
Plotnikov D.A. Osobennosti deystviya printsipa ravnopraviya storon v proizvodstve po delam, voznikayushchim iz publichnykh pravootnosheniy // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2013. N 5. S. 7-10.
Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: V 6 t. / Nauchnyy konsul'tant proekta E.A. Skripilev. T. VI: Rossiyskaya Federatsiya / Otv. red. L.B. Alekseeva. S. 470.
Gayfutdinova R.Z. Ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo: osobennosti obrashcheniya vzyskaniya na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo / Pod red. D.Kh. Valeeva. M.: Statut, 2016. S. 158.
Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. M.S. Shakaryan. S. 63-64.
Fursov D.A. Sovremennoe ponimanie printsipov grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Statut, 2009. S. 17.
Valeev D.Kh. Sistema protsessual'nykh garantiy prav grazhdan i organizatsiy v ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2009. S. 20.
Valeev D.Kh. Sistema printsipov ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Ispolnitel'noe pravo. 2006. № 1. S. 6-13.