Beliefs, religions, churches
Barinov N.N. —
Origination and evolution of two practices at the Divine Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts in Ruthenia (Historical-theological analysis)
// Genesis: Historical research.
– 2018. – ¹ 8.
– P. 1 - 10.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.8.26698 URL: http://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=26698
Read the article
This article examines the historical-theological aspects of the emergence and evolution of two different practices at the Divine Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts in Ruthenia. The acute importance of this topic is substantiated by the fact that it directly touches upon one of the key Sacraments – the Sacrament of Eucharist, as well as the major divine service – the Liturgy. The relevance is stipulated by the currently occurred polemics regarding the correspondence of these practices to the Church Canons and patristic doctrine. The goal of the work lies in analysis of the historical and theological documents on the matter. The author considers the historical context and theological questions of the evolution of two different practices at the Divine Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts in Ruthenia. The analysis is conducted based on the critical examination of historical documents and historical-theological research dedicated to the topic at hand. A conclusion is made that with the adoption of Christianity in Ruthenia has originated the practice to imbue the consecrated bread with the blood of Christ for conducting the Divine Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts. However, there is no reliable date on the existence in Ruthenia of other practice of not saturating the consecrated bread. The article also demonstrates the merits of Saint Peter Mogila, particularly such associated with the establishment of the Orthodox Practice at the Divine Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts, as well as argues the unjust accusations against him. Based on this fact, as assumption is made regarding his church-wide canonization.
Saint Theophan the Recluse, Saint Peter Mogila, Moscow Eucharistic disputes, scholasticism, transubstantiation, Presanctified Gifts, Liturgy, Professor Uspensky, Smirnov-Platonov, Professor Karabinov
Asmus V., prot. K otsenke bogosloviya svyatitelya Petra Mogily, mitropolita kievskogo. // Bogoslovskiy sbornik. Vyp.10. M. PSTBI. 2002, S.224-241.
Barinov N. N. Razvitie dvukh praktik na Liturgii Prezhdeosvyashchennykh Darov s pervykh vekov khristianstva po XIV v. (Istoriko-bogoslovskiy analiz) // Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. — 2018.-¹ 6.-S.7-15. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.6.26008. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/hr/article_26008.html
Barinov N.N. Razvitie dvukh praktik na Liturgii Prezhdeosvyashchennykh Darov v XIV – XX vv. (Istoriko-bogoslovskiy analiz) // Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. — 2018.-¹ 7.-S.1-6. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.7.26464. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/hr/article_26464.html
Voprosy chernoriztsa Kirika ili Kir³aka, predlozhennye novgorodskomu episkopu Nifontu. // Pamyatniki Rossiyskoy slovesnosti XII veka. M. 1821.258 s.
Zheltov M. S., svyashch. Liturgiya prezhdeosvyashchennykh darov. URL: http://www.pravenc.ru/text/2110603.html
Ioann Vostorgov, sshchmch. Staroe i novoe. // Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v 5-ti