Question at hand
Kireeva E.V. —
Budgetary Risks: Assessment and Ways of Minimization
// Finance and Management. – 2017. – № 3.
– P. 1 - 8.
Read the article
Review: The subject of the research is the problems related to the analysis of budgetary risks and the ways to minimize the impact of above described risks on the social and economic situation in Russia. The object of the research is the federal budget of the Russian Federation. The author of the article examine such aspects of the topic as methods to evaluate probability and intensity of the negative influence that risks may hvae on the budget stability; and creation of the reserves that allow to influence the quality budget functions, in particular, stabilising and stimulating functions. The author pays special attention to the insufficient elaboration of the important elements of a complete system of the budget risk management mechanism. The research methods include analysis of data from official Internet sites (Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation), and methods of synthesis of theoretical and practical aspects. The main findings of the research are as follows. The author of the article has analyzed the following key problems: 1. undeveloped categorical apparatus; 2. weak institutional structure of the budget risk management; 3. staff deficiency. The author's contribution and novelty of the research are caused by the fact that the author offers ways to solving the aforesaid problems.
Keywords: balancing of the budget, effectiveness, risk management, types of the budgetary risks, federal budget, method, assessment, budgetary risks, regulation, budgetary process
Slepov V.A., Chalova A.Yu. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya sovremennykh finansovykh tekhnologiy v byudzhetnom protsesse sub'ektov RF. // V sbornike: Pod'em ekonomiki regionov-strategicheskiy prioritet dlya Rossii Materialy VI mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy universitet im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2016. S. 58-64.
Gubin B.V. Byudzhet 2016 – byudzhet ozhidaniya pozitivnoy dinamiki i neytralizatsii sovremennykh riskov. //Vestnik IE RAN. №2. 2016 S. 154–164.
Gamukin V.B. Byudzhetnye riski: varianty traektoriy. // Voprosy regulirovaniya ekonomiki. 2015.T. 6, №4. s. 120-130.
Slepov V.A., Kireeva E.V. Gosudarstvennyy finansovyy kontrol': problemy organizatsii i vzaimodeystviya v sovremennykh rossiyskikh usloviyakh. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2015. № 6 (84). S. 71-77.
Kireeva E.V. Osobennosti sovremennogo sostoyaniya sistemy regional'nykh finansov Rossii. Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2017. № 1-3 (49). S. 359-368.
Kireeva E.V. Povyshenie effektivn
Investments and investing
Brovkin A.V. —
Recommendations for Developing the Methodology of Socio-Economic Impact Assessment When Implementing Infrastructure Projects
// Finance and Management. – 2017. – № 3.
– P. 9 - 16.
Read the article
Review: The article is devoted to developing the methodology for comprehensive assessment of all the combination of 'external effects' and 'socio-economic efficiency' of infrastructure projects. The author of the article gives necessary definitions and provides a broad list of effect groups that can be assessed. He also provides variants of indicators for each group of effects to assess relevant effects. The comprehensive analysis of project efficiency will extend the list of criteria that can be used in the decision making process concerning whether to implement an infrastructure project or not. This will allow to assess the impact on the society in general and encourage the best investment decisions. The results of the present research were obtained using analysis and systematisation of researches in this sphere combined with the author's recommendations and findings. The main results of the research that represent the scientific value thereof is, first of all, the synthesis of different methodologies and socio-economic impact indicators used in these methodologies within the framework of one research. Secondly, results of the research can be used, and suggested to be used, by all those who are involved in developing the unified basic methodology of socio-economic impact assessment to be further used by infrastructure project designers, executives and assessors including state authorities which would allow to reduce the time and resource consumption when searching and/or developing the methodology. The author also makes a conclusion that such a unified methodology will contribute to making an infrastructure project to be a driver of innovation-based economic growth as a result of the comprehensive assessment of all socio-economic impact assessement of such an infrastructure project implementation.
Keywords: externality, socio-economic impact assessment, social return, social impact, social effects, investment projects, public efficiency, socioeconomic impact, infrastructure, methodology
Zhevlatova P.N. Otsenka obshchestvennoy effektivnosti proekta elektroenergeticheskoy sfery s uchetom gospodderzhki / P.N. Zhevlatova // Mezhdunarodnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 33–39.
Eksternaliya [Elektronnyy resurs] / Sayt "Vikipediya". – Rezhim dostupa: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eksternaliya, svobodnyy. – Zagl. s ekrana.
Khayrullin V.A. Metod rascheta sotsial'nogo effekta v khode realizatsii investitsionno-stroitel'nogo protsessa / V.A. Khayrullin, I.G. Terekhov, A.S. Ogneva // Internet-zhurnal "Naukovedenie". – 2013. – № 4. – S. 58.
Krymov S.M. Gudvill kak instrument upravleniya stoimost'yu kompanii / S.M. Krymov, N.A. Anikina // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment. – 2010. – № 26. – S. 68-72.
Kievskiy L.V. Mul'tiplikativnye effekty stroitel'noy deyatel'nosti / L.V. Kievskiy // Internet-zhurnal "Naukovedenie". – 2014. – № 3 (22). – S. 104.
Sidorova E.N. Instituty razvitiya kak instrument realizatsii gosudarstvennoy investitsionnoy politiki: analiz sovremennog