Abstract: The subject of this research is the problems of allocation of resources associated with risk management of the registry of securities holders. The object of this research is the activity of the registrars on risk management. The author examines the peculiarities of risk management techniques of registrars, and dynamics of their application for the period from 2001 to 2018. The factors that contribute to selection of one or another technique are analyzed. Special attention is given to the market insurance and reservation as management techniques, as well as to price and institutional factors that affect the choice. The article employs the methods of retrospective research of economic indicators in accordance with sampling that covers Russia’s largest registrars (in 2001-2018), as well as methods of correlation and regression analysis. As a result of the conducted research, the author determines stages in the dynamics of using the key risk management techniques. The factors of dynamics are related to the parameters of risk and relative cost of implementation of particular techniques. The author's contribution consists in the empirical research on the basis of public data of factors and trends in allocation of resources associated with risk management of registrars on the financial market for the period from 2001 to 2018. The novelty of this work lies in outlining the factors and trends in allocation of resources related to risk management of registrars in fort the period from 2001 to2018, considering public data on the activity of Russia’s largest registrars, content analysis of publications, and case law of the  computer-based legal research system “ConsultantPlus”.

Keywords: allocation of resources), securities marke, register, market insurance, economic security, risk management, Reservation, risk control, Diversification, Risk sharing

References:
Wolfers A. «National Security» as an Ambiguous Symbol // Political Science Quarterly. – 1952. – Vol. 67. – ¹ 4. r. 481–502.
Infrastruktura rynka tsennykh bumag-2018: analiticheskiy obzor. – M.: PARTAD, INFI–PARTAD, 2018. 85 s.
Lanskov P. Tarifnaya politika v uchetnoy infrastrukture rynka tsennykh bumag i problemy ee regulirovaniya // Rynok tsennykh bumag. – 2017. – ¹ 2 .s. 39-43.
Lanskov P., Gusov O., Nilov D. Ot bar'erov k perspektivam: istoriya normativnogo regulirovaniya deyatel'nosti po vedeniyu reestrov imennykh tsennykh bumag v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rynok tsennykh bumag. – 2014. – ¹ 7. s. 8-12.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF ot 2 avgusta 2005 g. ¹ 16112/03 // Vestnik VAS RF. – 2005. – ¹ 12.
Postanovlenie FKTsB RF ot 19 iyunya 1998 g. ¹ 24 (red. ot 13.11.2002) «Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya o litsenzirovanii deyatel'nosti po vedeniyu reestra vladel'tsev imennykh tsennykh bumag» // Vestnik FKTsB Rossii. – 1998. – ¹ 5. (utratil silu).
Prikaz FSFR Rossii ot 25 dekabrya 2012 g. ¹ 12-111/pz-n «O maksim

Abstract: The subject of this research is the problems of allocation of resources related to risk management of administrators the securities register. The object of this research is the activity of security registrars on risk management. The author examines the peculiarities of risk management techniques, dynamics of their utilization in 2001-2018. The impact of factors on changing preferences with regards to different methods of risk managements is explored. Special attention is given to market insurance and reserving, as well as price and institutional factors affecting the selection of risk management techniques. As a result of the conducted research, the author defines the stages in the dynamics of implementation of the key methods of risk management, which depend on the parameters of risk and relative cost value of the use of particular means. The author’s contribution consists in the empirical research on the basis of public data and trends of changing the allocation of resources related to risk management of securities registrars over the period from 2001 to 2018. The scientific novelty lies in determination of trends and factors of changing the allocation of resources, associated with risk management of registrars in the period of 2001-2018 based on the public data on the activity of largest registrars of the Russian Federation, content analysis of publications and case law documents provided by the centralized database “Consultant Plus”.

Keywords: allocation of resources, securities marke, register, market insurance, economic security, risk management, Reservation, risk control, Diversification, Risk sharing

References:
Entsiklopediya finansovogo risk-menedzhmenta / pod red. A. A. Lobanova, A. V. Chugunova. – M.: Al'pina Biznes-Buks, 2009. s. 575–702.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 22 aprelya 1996 g. ¹ 39-FZ «O rynke tsennykh bumag». St. 8 (s izm., vnesennymi Federal'nym zakonami ot 18 iyulya 2009 g. ¹ 181–FZ, ot 13 iyulya 2015 g. ¹ 223–FZ) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 1996. – ¹ 17. – st. 1918.
Ukazanie Banka Rossii ot 22 marta 2018 g. ¹ 4748–U «O maksimal'noy plate, vzimaemoy derzhatelem reestra vladel'tsev tsennykh bumag s zaregistrirovannykh lits za provedenie operatsiy po litsevym schetam i za predostavlenie informatsii iz reestra vladel'tsev tsennykh bumag, i poryadke ee opredeleniya» (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 17 aprelya 2018 g. ¹ 50800) // Vestnik Banka Rossii. – 2018. – ¹ 36.
Ukazanie Banka Rossii ot 21 avgusta 2017 g. ¹ 4501–U (red. ot 27.08.2019) «O trebovaniyakh k organizatsii professional'nym uchastnikom rynka tsennykh bumag sistemy upravleniya riskami, svyazannymi s osushchestvleniem professional'noy deyatel'nosti na rynke tsenny

Abstract: The subject of the research is the economic relatins that arise in the process of implementing blockchain technologies for securitization of assets. At the present time low transparency and high complexity of the securitization mechanism as a result of the need in a great number of supporting documents generated by a lot of companies and agencies make it essential to apply blockchain technologies to this sphere. The author of the article describes the process of assets securitizaton and problems that may arise in the process of its implementation. The aim of the research is to study efficiency of blockchain technologies in the securitization process. To achieve this aim, the author has used such research methods as analysis, synthesis, generalisation and comparison. The author of the article offers his own model of a decentralized infrastructure of interaction during the securitization process that allows to find solutions of existing problems. This model can be applied to all kinds and stages of the securitization process. Such a decentralized infrastructure allows to reduce the time for document processing, transation costs and raise the level of the process transparency. The securitization process will become cheaper, more stable and efficient which will draw more interests of investors and allow emitents to find an integral solution of risk distribution tasks. 

Keywords: originator, SPV, loan pool, assets, smart contract, blockchain technology, securitization, investor, transactions, securities

References:
Savel'ev I.E. Tekhnologiya blockchain i ee primenenie // Prikladnaya informatika, 2016, t.11, ¹ 6 (66), s. 19-24
Walport, M. Distributed ledger technology: Beyond block chain // Government Office for Science, 2015, pp. 1-88.
Belozerov C.A., Lupyr' A.A.. Klassifikatsiya kak instrument otsenki ipotechnykh tsennykh bumag // Finansy i kredit, 2011, t. 17, ¹ 44, s. 16-27.
Matrosov S.V. Traditsionnaya i sinteticheskaya sek'yuritizatsiya finansovykh aktivov // Prepodavatel' XXI vek, 2012, t. 2, ¹ 2, s. 405-410.
Dzhukha V.M., Kokin A.N. Preimushchestva i nedostatki sek'yuritizatsii kak investitsionnogo instrumenta infrastrukturnogo razvitiya // Finansovye issledovaniya, 2015, ¹ 2 (47), s. 23-29.
Kashurin N.I. Razvitie rynkov ipotechnykh tsennykh bumag v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Notarial'nyy vestnik', 2010, ¹ 2, s. 13-22.
Rezvanova L.M. Mekhanizm sek'yuritizatsii v sisteme refinansirovaniya ipotechnogo kreditovaniya [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.reglament.net/bank/credit/2008_1_article.htm (data obrashch

Abstract: The present article is devoted to particularities of using the method of market multipliers in the process of assessing the company value based on the example of gas and oil companies in the Russian Federation. The author analyzes opportunities and reasonability of applying market multipliers to assessing the value of peer companies and describes minuses and pluses of this method. The author has discovered the relationship between volatility of common-stock value and volatility of price multipliers (P/E, P/B), and has analyzed the force and orientation of these relations. Based on the results of the research, the author evaluates the opportunity and reasonability of applying multipliers of peer companies in the process of assessing the value of gas and oil companies in the Russian Federation based on the results of the period since 2006 till 2015. According to the author, it is reasonable to apply the peer company multiplier method to the gas and oil sector of the Russian Federation in order to carry out a fast assessment of a company's value or to prove the value of a company assessed by other methods (cost and profit methods). On the basis of the determination ratio obtained, the author concludes that volatility of common-stock value depends on the volatility of price multipliers of gas and oil companies in the Russian Federation. The author has conducted a financial study using economic comparison and calculation of statistical and econometric values (correlation ratio and determination ratio). The purpose of the research was to study particularities of using the market multiplier method in the process of assessing Russian companies' value based on the example of gas and oil companies of the Russian Federation, in particular, the relationship between volatility of price multipliers value and volatility of common-stock value in the sphere of gas and oil sector of the Russian Federation for the period since 2006 till 2015. P/E and P/B ratios have been chosen as the main price multipliers under review. Recent researches allowed to discover the relationship between price multipliers and volatility of common-stock value on the European market. These conclusions formed the basis for further and more in-depth analysis of the relationship between volatility of price multipliers value and volatility of common-stock value for gas and oil companies of the Russian Federation covered by the present article. The method of multipliers is quite easy- and fast-to-use and therefore can be successfully used to assess a company's value. Many practical assessors apply this method. Quite often they make calculations using multipliers when there is no time or enough information but, as the results of the research show, this can create wrong assessments. The author proves that it is however possible to apply the multipliers method to assessing the value of gas and oil companies of the Russian Federation. The author also proves that it is possible to apply volatility of price multipliers to creating a forecasting model predicting volatility of common-stock value of companies performing in the sphere of gas and oil sector of the Russian market. The author of the article emphasizes the risk of using the above mentioned method due to the fact that this method provides results of high volatility values and absolute and relative indicators for both multipliers and common-stock. The author continues this research in other sectors as well. For example, the author plans to cover up to 10 different sectors of the Russian Federation economy including metallurgy, mechanic engineering, petro-chemistry, power engineering, banking, telecommunication, consumer sector, etc. This will allow to better understand the opportunity to apply the method of multipliers to assessing common-stock value on the Russian Federation market. Even now it is already obvious that the situation has been rather contradictory over the studied period. The author plans to publish the results of researches in other sectors in the nearest future.  

Keywords: method of comparison, multipliers, assessment, volatility, common-stock value, correlation, determination ratio, correlation ratio, peer company, company value

References:
Ou J., A. & Penman, S., H. (1989). Accounting Measurement, Price-Earnings Ratio, and the Information Content of Security Prices, Journal of Accounting Research, 27, 111-144
Black, R. (1976). Studies in stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 177-181
Barnes, R. (2001). Earnings Volatility and Market Valuation: An Empirical Investigation, LBS Accounting Subject Area Working Paper No. ACCT019, p.4
Seghal S. & Pandey, A. (2009). The Behaviour of Price Multiples in India (1990–2007), Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5 (1), 31-65
Ibbotson, R. (2011). Why does market volatility matter?, Yale insights, [online], Available via: http://qn.som.yale.edu/content/why-does-market-volatility-matter [Retrieved 2013-02-22]
Liu J., Doron N., Jacob T. (2002). «Equity valuation using multiples». Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40, pp. 135–172.
Moore, D., S.