Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shinkaretskaya G.G., Ryzhov V.B. Content and Limits of 'Domaine Reserve'

Abstract: The category domaine reserve, or "domestic jurisdiction", appeared as a means of restricting the right of international organizations or individual States to interfere in the decisions, or the consequences of decisions, taken by a State. The principle of State sovereignty is increasingly realized as a condition essential for the establishment of effective law and order in the world: More and more often the norms of international law are realized at the national level. One of the examples of this is the sphere of economic interests of States. A State takes a decision and international law fi xes this fact, or the decision is taken at an international level and then the State fulfi lls the norm of international law in its internal system in accordance with its own obligations.

Keywords:

domaine reserve, principle, State sovereignty, effective law, norms, international law, internal system, domestic jurisdiction, national level, international level.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Fedorchenko A.A. Pravo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.87-103. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.1.11639. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11639.htm
2. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
3. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 92-103. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.6.
4. Kalamkaryan R.A.. Mezhdunarodnyi sud kak glavnyi sudebnyi organ Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 210-232. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737.
5. Kostenko N.I.. Rol' Organizatsii Ob''edinennykh Natsii po resheniyu problem pravosudiya perekhodnogo perioda i gospodstva prava v konfliktnykh // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 560-571. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10012.
6. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
7. Abgarjan D... Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules in different spheres of the Ocean Activity // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 96-106. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11622.
8. Shetreet, Transnational Protection of Human Rights (Report for the XII Congress of the Academy of Comparative Law), Australia, August 1986.
9. Shinkaretskaya G.G.. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud: popytka otsenki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 88-95. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593.
10. Anthony D' Amato, Nicaragua and International Law: The "Academic" and the "Real", in: American Journal of International Law 79 (1985), 657—664 (659).
11. Herbert W. Briggs, Reservations to the Acceptance of Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, in: RdC 93 (1958/1), 223—366 (328—363).
12. Rudolf Dolzer, Connally Reservation, in: Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, instalment 1, Amsterdam et ah 1981, 55, 56 (55).
13. P. Movchan, Human Rights and International Relations (in Russian), Moscow 1982, 20.
14. Stephen Hall, International Law, Hong Kong, 2006, p.248.
15. Abgarjan D.. Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules in different spheres of the Ocean Activity // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2014. - 1. - C. 96 - 106. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11622.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.