Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Khrenov N.A. Cinema and City: Folklore Image of Festive Revelry in Early Cinematography Reception

Abstract: The subject of the present research is the mythological subtexts that define how particular movies and films created in different periods are perceived by the audience. According to the author, these subtexts have a strong influence on mass consciousness of public, however, public is usually unaware of such influence. Among other things the content of mass reception includes out-of-cinematographic manifestations of collective unconscious. Mental projections of archetypic images which came into existence in different periods of cultural history and connected with utopian visions, myths, and religious symbols are coming to the fore. Noteworthy that projections on the city are precede the projections of collective unconscious on the cinema; they are transferred into the cinema later on. Finally, the cinema in principal makes a colossal intertext in which cultural history is reflected both in its axial and pre-axial aspects. The scope of analysis comes down to the projections which become realistic already at early stages of cinematography history. To define mythological and archetypical subtexts of cinematography reception, the author of the article has used methodology of such academic disciplines as receptive esthetics, psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. The main conclusions of the research are the following: a) the structure of the audience of early cinematograph was made up mostly of urban social groups which had folklore stereotypes in their consciousness; b) the city was perceived in accordance with the folklore stereotype of the festive revelry as a synonym for freedom; c) the aura around the city created by the mass consciousness defines many things including how cinematography is perceived. The author's contribution to the topic of cinematography reception is the recognition of the image of cinema containing the myth of the city. The  novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author of the article describes specific archetypes that exist in the mind of the audience (recipients) and become evident in the process of cinematography perception. 


Keywords:

rite, liminality, utopia, holiday, archetype, reception, folklore, myth, city, cinematography


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shelling F. Filosofiya mifologii., t. 2. SPb., 2013.
2. Tsiv'yan Yu. Istoricheskaya retseptsiya kino. Kinematograf v Rossii. 1896-1930. Riga., 1991.
3. Chukovskiy K. Nat Pinkerton i sovremennaya literatura. M., 1910.
4. Khrenov N. Kino v funktsii formirovaniya i podderzhaniya kollektivnoy identichnosti // Kino i kollektivnaya identichnost'. M., 2013.
5. Khrenov N. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty vzaimodeystviya iskusstva i publiki.M., 1981.
6. Khrenov N. Kino: reabilitatsiya arkhetipicheskoy real'nosti.M., 2006.
7. Trubetskoy E. "Inoe tsarstvo" i ego iskateli v russkoy narodnoy skazke // Literaturnaya ucheba. 1990., ¹ 2-3.
8. Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M., 1983.
9. Toporov V. Peterburg i peterburgskiy tekst russkoy literatury // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vypusk 18., t. 664.. 1984.
10. Psikhologiya teatral'noy tolpy // Teatr i iskusstvo. 1898., ¹ 5.
11. Sennet R. Padenie publichnogo cheloveka. M.. 2002.
12. Propp V. Russkie agrarnye prazdniki.L., 1963.
13. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M., 2003.
14. Lotman Yu. Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda // Semiotika goroda i gorodskoy kul'tury. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vypusk 18., t. 664., Tartu., 1984.
15. Ivanov Vyach. Predchuvstviya i predvestiya // Ivanov Vyach. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M., 1994.
16. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. K semioticheskomu izucheniyu kul'turnoy istorii bol'shogo goroda // Semiotika prostranstva i prostranstvo semiotiki. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vypusk 19., t. 664., Tartu., 1986.
17. Dellyuk L. Fotogeniya kino. M., 1924.
18. Zorkaya N. Kinematograf v zhizni Aleksandra Bloka // Iz istorii kino. Vypusk 9., M., 1974.
19. Zorkaya N. Na rubezhe stoletiy. U istokov massovogo iskusstva v Rossii 1900-1910-kh godov. M., 1976.
20. Veber A. Rost gorodov v KhIKh stoletii. SPb.,1903.
21. Voloshin M. Mysli o teatre // Apollon., 1910., ¹ 5.
22. Geynim. Sinematograf i teatr // Sine-fono., 1913., ¹ 23.
23. Gurevich L. Zametki o sovremennoy literature. Mechty i mysli o novoy drame // Russkaya mysl'., M., 1910., ¹ 4.
24. Vasil'ev N. Vopros o padenii Zapadnoy Rimskoy imperii i antichnoy kul'tury v istoriograficheskoy literature i v istorii filosofii v svyazi s teoriey istoshcheniya narodov i chelovechestva // Izvestiya obshchestva arkheologii, istorii i etnografii pri Kazanskom universitete. t. KhKhKhI., Vypusk 1-4., Kazan'., 1920.
25. Belyy A. Teatr i sovremennaya drama // Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie.M., 1994.
26. Bazen A.Chto takoe kino? M., 1972.
27. Belyy A. Sinematograf //Belyy A. Arabeski.M., 1911.