Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

The union of criminalists and criminologists
Reference:

Dorogin D.A. Decriminalization of a deed as a circumstance eliminating criminal liability

Abstract: The article considers particular disputable issues of decriminalization of a deed from the viewpoint of its consideration as a circumstance eliminating criminal liability. The author touches upon various aspects of the problem, adduces the existing viewpoints and formulates his own position. Particularly, the criminal law doesn’t differentiate the absence of components of crime per se and the absence of components of crime due to the decriminalization of a deed, both from the viewpoint of reasons for termination of a criminal procedure and from the viewpoint of emergence of the right to vindication. The author applies general scientific and special methods, including analysis and the structural-logical method. The author concludes that decriminalization of a deed should be considered as a circumstance eliminating criminal liability. The act doesn’t contain the components of crime and such signs of crime as illegality and punishability. The author supposes that at present there exist theoretical, material-legal and procedural reasons for considering decriminalization of a deed as a circumstance eliminating criminal liability. The similar approach should be applied for defining a legal nature of the absence of the criminal law. 


Keywords:

doctrine, criminal liability, elimination, circumstance, deed, Decriminalization, crime, in abstracto, censure, vindication


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast'. V 2-kh t. T. 1. Pod red. N.F. Kuznetsovoy, I.M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 1999. S. 106-107; Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva, A.V. Naumova. M., 2000. 64; Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast'. Pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 2007. S. 35; Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya. Pod red. A.I. Raroga. M., 2012. S. 22-23.
2. Fil'chenko A.P. Vozniknovenie, smyagchenie i prekrashchenie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (problemy otraslevogo i mezhotraslevogo soglasovaniya). M., 2014. S. 236-237. v abstraktsii, v otvlechenii, abstraktno, otvlechenno (lat.).
3. Esakov G.A. Negativnye priznaki sostava prestupleniya: postanovka voprosa // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. Materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (30-31 yanvarya 2014 g.). M., 2014. S. 104.
4. Fil'chenko A.P. Vozniknovenie, smyagchenie i prekrashchenie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (problemy otraslevogo i mezhotraslevogo soglasovaniya). M., 2014. S. 237.
5. Lesnichenko I.P. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': ponyatie i problemy realizatsii. Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2005. S. 16.
6. Fil'chenko A.P. Vozniknovenie, smyagchenie i prekrashchenie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (problemy otraslevogo i mezhotraslevogo soglasovaniya). M., 2014. S. 237. dovedenie do absurda (lat.).
7. Esakov G.A. Negativnye priznaki sostava prestupleniya: postanovka voprosa // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke. Materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (30-31 yanvarya 2014 g.). M., 2014. S. 104 (snoska).
8. Braynin Ya.M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' i ee osnovanie v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. M., 1963. S. 247-249.