Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Osminin B.I. Distinctive Features of Conclusion and Implementation of International Treaties by the Netherlands

Abstract: The Netherlands is a state with a legal system that is very open to international law. All treaties that are binding on the Netherlands as matter of international law are automatically incorporated in the domestic legal order. The Constitution of the Netherlands establishes that acts of national legislation shall not be applicable if such application is in conflict with provisions of treaties that are binding on all persons. The Constitution permits the possibility of tacit approval of treaties by parliament. As an exception the treaty can be submitted to parliament for approval once consent to be bound has been expressed. Any provisions of a treaty that conflict with the Constitution may be approved by parliament only if at least two-thirds of the votes cast are in favour. The most remarkable aspects of the implementation of international treaties by the Netherlands are the relatively large possibility of direct application by the courts and executive and the supremacy of directly effective treaty provisions over statutes and even the Constitution.


Keywords:

automatic incorporation, express approval, tacit approval, binding on all persons, direct effect, supremacy, treaty obligations, self-executing treaties, non-self-executing treaties, the supremacy of treaties.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alkema E. International Law in Domestic Systems // Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. 2010. Vol. 14.3 // URL: http:// www.ejcl.org/143/art143-1.pdf.
2. Amending the (Dutch) Constitution? Expert Meeting on National Constitutions and Globalisation. Brief Concept Paper. The Hague Institute for Internationalisation of Law (HIIL). 12 March 2010.
3. Besselink L. Fundamental Structures of the Constitution of the Netherlands. Universiteit Utrecht. 2008 // URL: http:// dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/25731.
4. Besselink L. Becoming a Party to Treaties Which Diverge From the Constitution. Universiteit Utrecht // European Public Law. 2003. Vol. 9.
5. Brouwer J. Treaty Law and Practice in the Netherlands. Groningen. 2002.
6. Dijk P. and Tahzib B. Parliamentary Participation in the Treaty Making Process of the Netherlands // Chicago-Kent Law Review. 1991. Vol. 67.
7. Efthymiou N., de Wit J. The Role of Dutch Courts in the Protection of Fundamental Rights // Utrecht Law Review. 2013. Vol. 9.
8. Expression of Consent by States to Be Bound by a Treaty. Analytical Report and Country Reports. Part II: Country Reports. Netherlands. Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International Law (CAHDI). Council of Europe. CAHDI (2001). 3. Strasbourg, 23 January 2001.
9. Fleuren J. The Application of Public International Law by Dutch Courts // Netherlands International Law Review. 2010. Vol. LVII.
10. Hillebrink S. Political decolonization and self-determination: the case of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. Doctoral thesis. Leiden University. 2007.
11. Kingdom Act on the Approval and Publication of Treaties. 7 July 1994 // Compilation of Constitutional and Legislative Provisions on Treaty Practice of the Netherlands. 2012.
12. Nollkaemper A. The Netherlands // The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study / ed. by D. Sloss. Cambridge University Press. 2009.
13. Pfafferott C. Dutch National Referendum Law Approved. 15.04.2014 // URL: http://www.democracy-international.org/ dutch-national-referendum-law-approved.
14. Small Places: the Home-Soming of Human Rights. Inaugural Lecture Prof. B. Oomen 2 December 2011. Universiteit Utrecht. 2011.
15. Van der Schyff J., Meuwese A. Dutch Constitutional Law in Globalizing World // Utrecht Law Review. 2013. Vol. 9.
16. Voermans W. Constitutional Reserves and Covert Constitutions // Indian Journal of Constitutional Law. 2009. Vol. 3.
17. Bernam U. Pravovaya sistema SShA / Per. s angl. M., 2006.
18. Osminin B.I. Voprosy samoispolnimosti mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov (na primere SShA, Niderlandov i Rossii) // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. ¹ 6