Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Timoshenko I.G. Open Government in Foreign Countries: Modern Status and Problems

Abstract: This paper is concerned with issues of foreign states experience in the field of legal regulation of institutes of open government and foreign practice of its implementation in context of public government modernization, development of citizens’ right to information and participation in public government. Historic and comparative methods are used in the process of study. In particular evolution and contemporary substance of open government regulation approaches abroad are examined on the basis of comparative analysis of foreign countries legislation and practice as well as international recommendations. Positive and negative experience of open government concept implementation abroad is discussed. Special attention is given to consideration of electronic government and forms of its functioning in public government bodies’ activities in foreign countries. The analysis of legislative basis and practical experience of implementation of open government in foreign countries makes it clear that, in spite of some progress in this sphere, substantial quantity of states are faced to some legal, organizational and financial problems. These problems are connected with the practical difficulties in achieving the balance between traditional requirements of due public administration and contemporary requirements of providing of its openness. Advanced information technologies inculcation, while facilitating realization of openness, makes new problems, arising from necessity of protection of different kinds of information including personal data. Correct solution of these issues should be based on modernization of information legislation, systems of public control over executive bodies and development of other tools of public government democratization. This goal may be achieved on the base of balanced approach, making it possible to combine advantages of information openness with obligations of providing security of government bodies’ activities as well as protection of citizens’ rights in this process. Taking into account these reasons the author makes conclusion as to necessity of careful approach to possible application of some elements of foreign experience by Russian public bodies and officials.


Keywords:

open government, e-government, regulation, national, legislation, information, internet – technology, democracy.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan «Ob informatizatsii» // www.rcc.org.ru/.../Zakoni.../ZAKONI.../2_ZRKAZ_217_III_ ZRK_Zakon_Ob_Informatizatsii.doc
2. Khramtsovskaya N.A. Otkrytoe pravitel'stvo SShA: osnovnye idei i praktika realizatsii. Informatsionnye sistemy dlya nauchnykh issledovanii. Sbornik nauchnykh statei. Trudy XV Vserossiiskoi ob''edinennoi konfe-rentsii «Internet i sovremennoe obshchestvo» (IMS–2012). SPb. 2012. S. 316–322.
3. E-Government Act 2002 // Pub.L. 107–347, 116Stat.2899, 44 U.S.C. §101, H.R. 2458/S. 803.
4. Austria Federal Act on Provisions Facilitating Electronic Communications with Public Bodies 2002 (Bundesgesetz über Regelungen zur Erleichterung des elektronischen Verkehrs mit öffentlichen Stellen, E-Government-Gesetz – E-GovG) Austrian Federal Law Gazette, part I, Nr. 10/2004.
5. Malaysia Electronic Government Activity Act 2007 – Mampu Malaysia // www.mampu.gov.my/.../22b3e97b-6. Macedonia Law on Electronic Management 2009. Official Gazette of RM ¹ 105.21.08.2009. 7. Germany Electronic Government Act 2013 // www.bmi.bund.de 8. Republic of Korea. Electronic Government Act. Act No. 6439, Mar. 28, 2001. Amended by Act No. 6585, Dec. 31, 2001. Act No. 6871, May 15, 2003. 9. E-Government Act of 2002 /Public Law 107–347, 116 Stat.2899, 44 U.S.C. § 101, H.R. 2458/S. 803. 10. The Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996 (E-FOIA The Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552, As Amended vy Public Law No. 104–231, 110 Stat. 3048. 11. The Freedom of Information Act 1966 (FOIA) 5 U.S.C. §552. 12. Privacy Act 1974. Public Law 93–579. Stat. 1896 5 U.S.C. Ch.5/552a. 13. Open Government Declaration // http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/open-government-declaration 14. Government 2.0: Gartner Definition // Gartner, Industry Research, 11 November 2009, ID Number:G00172423. URL:http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=260&mode=2&PageID=3460702&id=1224639&ref =g_emalert 15. Maio A.D. Government 2.0. What is Open Government For? Gartner Blog Network/March 19.2010. 16. Public Law 94–409, 90 Stat.1241, enacted September 13, 1976, 5 U.S.C. §552b. 17. Rodney A. Smolla, Free Speech in an Open Society.Knopf 1992. R. 115. 18. We: the People. Your voice in our Government. http:www://petitions.whitehouse.gov/google.ru/ search?q=portal+we+the+people 14. Freedom of Information Act 1966 /5 U.S.C. §552. 19. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/264391