Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Urban Geography and the Real Estate Market
Reference:

S.Ê. Tamazyan, Ì.N. Ogurtsova Court decision on invalidating the actions of registration bodies, and its execution

Abstract: The article offers a legal analysis of a court decision, ruling the actions of registration bodies invalid, as well as the process of its execution. According to Article 8 of the Russian Civil Code, civil law rights and liabilities emerge from a set of foundations – including a valid court ruling, which establishes rights and obligations. However, it does not specify which types of rulings may be the cause for such rights and obligations to be established or terminated. With that in mind, it is also said that “not every court ruling is always a source for establishing, or terminating civil law rights. The traits of a court ruling, which involves disputing of actions of registration organs, are the subject for research in this article. Analyzing the Government Registration of Real Property Rights and Transactions Act, we can conclude that the example court ruling is viewed as a valid foundation for the establishment of property rights, and, in turn, a valid foundation for government registration. However, a court ruling which invalidates the actions of a registration body, may not be the basis for establishing property rights, because it does not recognize, or establish the appellant’s property rights.


Keywords:

Court decision, ruled as invalid, execution, ruling, registration bodies, real property, right, satisfaction, refusal, dispute


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami statey 20 i 28 Federal'nogo zakona «O gosu-darstvennoy registratsii prav na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim» : informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 21 iyulya 2009 g. ¹ 132 // Vestnik Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii.-2009.-¹ 9.
2. O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Fe-deratsii : postanovlenie Plenuma Verkh. Suda Ros. Federatsii i Plenuma Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 01 iyulya 1996 g. ¹ 6/8 // Spetsial'noe prilozhenie k «Vestniku Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii».-2005.-¹ 12.
3. Kozlov M. Sud'ya ne vlasten nad reestrom? // ezh-YuRIST.-2006.-¹ 36.
4. O sudebnom reshenii : postanovlenie Plenuma Verkh. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 19 dek. 2003 g. ¹ 23 // Byulleten' Verkh. Suda Ros. Federatsii.-2004.-¹ 2.
5. Opredelenie Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 29 iyunya 2010 g. ¹ VAS-8197/10 // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy GARANT.
6. Ispolnitel'noe proizvodstvo ¹ 13613/13/23/26 // Arkhiv Mineralovodskogo rayonnogo otdela sudeb-nykh pristavov UFSSP Rossii po Stavropol'skomu krayu za 2013 g.
7. Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy / pod obshch. red. V. A. Belova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M. : «Yurayt»; «Yurayt-Izdat», 2011. S. 21.
8. Il'chenko A. L. Osparivanie v sude zaregistrirovannogo prava na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo // Notarius.-2004.-¹ 5.-S. 56.
9. Shvabauer A. V. Problemy pravovoy kvalifikatsii akta gosudarstvennoy registratsii prav na nedvi-zhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim // Pravo i ekonomika.-2010.-¹ 12.
10. Gurbanova E. V.Ustanovlenie yuridicheskikh faktov v otnoshenii nedvizhimosti-eshche ne fakt gosudar-stvennoy registratsii prav // Zakony Rossii : opyt, analiz, praktika.-2006.-¹ 7.
11. Kleymenova E. S. Obzhalovanie deystviy organov, osushchestvlyayushchikh gosudarstvennuyu registratsiyu prav na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim. Prakt. posob. // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy GARANT, 2009.
12. Eremenko V. Primenenie posledstviy nedeystvitel'nosti nichtozhnoy sdelki, svyazannoy s otchuzhdeniem nedvizhimogo imushchestva // Korporativnyy yurist.-2006.-¹ 3.