Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Sheveleva, S.V. Free will and subjective elements within the system of component elements of crime

Abstract: The article concerns the correlation between the terms “free will” and “guilt” as a necessary part of a subjective element within the system of component elements of crime. It is stated that these terms are not synonymous. Within the framework of the relation among the subjective elements within the system of component elements of crime the author compares free will with the institutions of causing damage with no guilt (Art. 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter, the Criminal Code); criminal sanity, criminal insanity and related institutions (Art. 21-22 of the Criminal Code); as well as the rules on criminal responsibility of persons, who have committed crimes in the state of intoxication (Art. 23 of the Criminal Code). The article includes a critical evaluation of the legislative provisions for causing damage with no guilt in Art. 28 part. 2 of the Criminal Code due to the fact that the denying elements are regarded not as objective, but as subjective elements. The results of the theoretical studies as well as a comparative approach towards the studies of criminal responsibility of persons, who have committed crime in a state of intoxication allows the author to draw a conclusion on the need of the “projection of freedom of will” when dealing with the issues of the responsibility for such persons.


Keywords:

freedom of will, subjective elements of crime, guilt, causing damage with no guilt, criminal insanity, limited sanity, state of intoxication, de facto insanity, elements of crime, presumption.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Korchagin A.G., Fedotova N.P. Kvalifikatsiya i sub''ektivnye predposylki otvetstvennosti za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 83-107. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_776.html
2. Fletcher Dzh., Naumov A. V. Osnovnye kontseptsii sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava. M., 1998.
3. Khell'mann Uve. Problemy ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za sovershenie prestupnogo deyaniya v sostoyanii alkogol'nogo op'yaneniya v Germanii // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: mat. IX mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. M., 2012.
4. Urda M. N., Sheveleva S. V. Ob optimizatsii mer protivodeistviya upravleniyu transportnym sredstvom v sostoyanii op'yaneniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. ¹10. S.56-58.
5. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyi kodeks) Federativnoi Respubliki Germaniya: tekst i nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii / per., primech. i komm. P. V. Golovnenkova. M., 2010.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnik. V 3 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast' / pod red. A. E. Zhalinskogo. M.: Izdatel'skii Dom «Gorodets», 2011.
7. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. L. V. Inogamovoi-Khegai, A. I. Raroga, A. I. Chuchaeva. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2012.
8. Teslitskii I. Nevinovnoe prichinenie vreda po psikhofiziologicheskomu osnovaniyu // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 50–53.
9. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. N. M. Kropacheva, B. V. Volzhenkina, V. V. Orekhova.-S.-Pb., 2006.
10. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya. T. 1. Tula. 2001.
11. Ter-Akopov A. A. Prestuplenie i problemy nefizicheskoi prichinnosti v ugolovnom prave. M., 2003.
12. Sudebnaya psikhiatriya: uchebnik / pod red. A. S. Dmitrieva, T. V. Klimenko. M., 1998
13. Rarog A. I. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: uchebnik / otv. red. A. I. Rarog. M., 2013.
14. Sitkovskaya O. D. Psikhologiya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti.-M.: Norma, 1998.
15. Polnyi kurs ugolovnogo prava V 5 t. T. I: Prestuplenie i nakazanie / pod red. A. I. Korobeeva.-S.-Pb.: Yurid. tsentr Press, 2008.
16. Peremolotova L. Yu. Prestupleniya, sovershaemye v sostoyanii alkogol'nogo op'yaneniya: ugolovno-pravovoi i kriminologicheskii aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002.
17. Pavlov V. G. Sub''ekt prestupleniya. SPb.: Yurid. tsentr Press, 2001.
18. Oreshkina T. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie nepreodolimoi sily // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 57–59.
19. Naumov A. V. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lektsii. V 2-kh t. T. 1. M., 1996.
20. Nazarenko G. V. Nevmenyaemost'. SPb., 2002.
21. Leikina N. S. Lichnost' prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost'. L., 1968.
22. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik. T. 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii / pod red. N. F. Kuznetsovoi, I. M. Tyazhkovoi. M.: Zertsalo, 1999.
23. Kotkova Yu. S. Nevinovnoe prichinenie vreda, obuslovlennoe ekstremal'nymi situatsiyami ili nervno-psikhicheskimi peregruzkami: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2003.
24. Kolmakov P. A. Nekotorye voprosy umen'shennoi vmenyaemosti // Pyat' let deistviya UK RF: itogi i perspektivy: mat. II mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. / otv. red. V. S. Komissarov. M., 2003.
25. Greben'kov A. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' lits, sovershivshikh prestuplenie v sostoyanii op'yaneniya. M., 2009.
26. Vandysh-Bubko V. V., Safuanov F. S. Ogranichennaya vmenyaemost': sudebno-ekspertologicheskii analiz // Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2009. ¹ 2.
27. Greben'kov A. A. Problema ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za sovershenie prestupleniya v sostoyanii nedobrovol'nogo op'yaneniya // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: mat. 6-i mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. M., 2009. S. 211–214.
28. Antonyan Yu. M., Borodin S. V. Prestupnoe povedenie i psikhicheskie anomalii / pod red. V. N. Kudryavtseva. M., 1998.
29. Archibasova L. A. Nevinovnoe prichinenie vreda. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2005.
30. Tokarchuk R.E. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' kak obshchii printsip ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 126-142. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.51. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_51.html