Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Korolev, M.P. Use of creative product for writing parody and its further use

Abstract: The object of studies is use of musical and other creative product in the process of making a parody. The legal norm on the free use of creative product for making parodies (Art. 1274, p.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) is not sufficiently efficient for the regulation of relations between the authors of the parodies and the authors of creative products used for these parodies. An original creative product plays a significant role in the mechanism of perception of the parody by the public, guaranteeing success of the parody in the course of its economic turnover. As a result of application of the current norm the interests of the authors of original creative products used for making parodies are being abridged. The author used the method of historical analysis of development of parody as a genre in literature and art, as well as analysis of the connection between an original creative products and a parody in the process of perception of the latter by the viewers, readers or audience. Since the legal norm on the free use of creative works for making parodies on their basis is adopted quite recently, there are no scientific evaluations of the relations in this sphere. In the course of evaluation of this issue the author makes a conclusion on the need to pay remuneration to the authors of all creative works, which are used for parodies.


Keywords:

copyright, parody, imitation, reworking the products, free use of products, royalty, creating a product, comical evaluation, original creative product, plagiatry.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Dyuma R. Literaturnaya i khudozhestvennaya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo Frantsii: Per. s fr. – M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1989.
2. Petrova Yu. Progmatika kul'tury. Sozdanie proizvedeniya v zhanre literaturnoy, muzykal'noy i inoy parodii na osnove drugogo proizvedeniya //Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2010. ¹4. S. 36-38.
3. Vol'fson V. Paradoksy pravoob'ektnosti: tsitata i allyuziya; parodiya – pastish. //Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2003. ¹10. S. 2-15.
4. Sherstoboeva E. A. Problema pravovogo polozheniya teleparodii v RF.//Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Fakul'teta zhurnalistiki MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. Vypusk ¹1. 2011 / www.mediascope.ru/node/714/.
5. Gerasimova E. Problema pravovogo regulirovaniya sozdaniya parodii na proizvedenie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2008. ¹10. S. 73-79; prodolzhenie 2009. ¹4. S. 24-30.