|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:
Demidova, L.N.
Structure of property damage
in criminal law of Ukraine
// Actual problems of Russian law.
2013. ¹ 11.
P. 1448-1453.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63435
Demidova, L.N. Structure of property damage in criminal law of UkraineAbstract: The article is devoted to a topical problem of defining the structure of property damage as a criminal consequence. The existing complications are due to the fact that there is no unified approach in the general theory of criminal law towards this matter, and the scholars provide varying descriptions of structure of such consequences even within a single type of crime. The said ambiguity influence the clarity of legal fixation of elements of crime in criminal law, and it causes judicial mistakes, violating the lawful right of victims for the full compensation of property damage caused by a crime. The article provides analysis of various positions on defining the structure of property damage; she singles out the key features, allowing to distinguish the property damage structure in criminal law from loss and damage in civil law. The author formulates the conclusions, which may be of help to legal practitioners for the purposes of guaranteeing lawfulness when classification certain crimes and compensating damage to property of a victim caused by a criminal act. Keywords: structure of damage, property damage, damage, criminal behavior, crime, compensation of harm, classification of crimes, loss, damage, additional losses.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Stashis V. V., Tats³y V. Ya. (red.). Krim³nal'ne pravo Ukra¿ni: Osobliva chastina : p³druchnik. – Kh. : Pravo, 2010.– 608 s.
2. Mikhlin A. S. Posledstviya prestupleniya. – M. : Yurid. lit-ra, 1969. – 104 s. 3. Panov N. I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prichinenie imushchestvennogo ushcherba putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doverie. – Kh. : Vishcha shkola, 1987.– 128 s. 4. Agudov V. V. Kolichestvo, kachestvo i struktura // Voprosy filosofii. – 1967.-¹ 1.-S. 52-70. 5. Vladimirov V. A., Yu. I. Lyapunov. Otvetstvennost' za korystnye posyagatel'stva na sotsialisticheskuyu sobstvennost'. – M. : Yurid. lit-ra, 1986.– 223 s. 6. Kerimov D. A. Metodologiya prava: Predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava. – M.: Izd-vo SGU, 2008. – 521 s. 7. Korzhanskiy N. I. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy protiv lichnosti i sobstvennosti. – Volgograd : VSSh MVD SSSR, 1984. – 60 s. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
