Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Gulasaryan, A.S. Responsibility of international organizations and national courts

Abstract: In this article for the first time in the Russian international law doctrine, the author analyzes the issues of responsibility of international organizations in the national courts. The author provides large amount of judicial practice by both international and national courts, which shows the need to limit the immunity of international organizations in order guarantee the rights of individuals for the judicial protection, as enshrined by various international legal documents. The article includes detailed analysis of positions of Russian and foreign legal scholars on this problem. The author then offers a concept for the so-called alternative means of dispute resolution (administrative tribunals of international organizations, arbitration) as a possible option for applying the limitations to the immunity of international organizations in the national courts. Such a healthy evolution of approaches is aimed to guarantee the access to justice. At the same time, the authors point out that in the absence of adequate alternative mechanisms for the legal protection, the states may breach their international obligations in the sphere of human rights.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, international organizations, responsibility, the International Court of Justice, the EU Court, the European Court of Human Rights, the national courts, alternative dispute resolutions means, administrative tribunals, arbitration.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Ispolinov A.S. Sanktsii Soveta Bezopasnosti OON, sudy ES i prava cheloveka // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2011. — ¹ 6 (37).
2. Neshataeva T.N. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i pravo. Novye tendentsii v mezhdunarodno-pravovom regulirovanii. — M., 1998.
3. Entin M.L. Ustanovlenie kosvennoy yurisdiktsii Suda ES nad rezolyutsiyami Soveta Bezopas-nosti OON // Vsya Evropa.ru. — 2009. — ¹9 (36) // URL: http://alleuropa.ru/index.php?Option= comcontent&task=view&id=1246.
4. Alvarez J.E. Judging the Security Council // American Journal of International Law. — 1996. — Vol. 90.
5. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international. — 1957. — Vol. 47 (2).
6. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international. — 1977. — Vol. 57 (2).
7. Cassese A. L’immunitéde juridiction civile des organizations internationales dans la jurisprudence italienne // Annuaire Franéais de Droit International. — 1984. — Vol. 30.
8. Case-Law Database of the ILO Administrative Tribunal «Triblex» // URL: http://www.ilo.org/ public/ english/tribunal/index.htm.
9. Charney J. Is International Law Threatened by Multiple Tribunals? // Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye. — 1998. — Vol. 271.
10. Cot J.-P., Pellet A. (eds). La Charte des Nations Unies — Commentaire Article par Article. Economica, Paris & Bruylant, Bruxelles, 1991.
11. de Wet E. The Role of European Courts in the Development of the Hierarchy of Norms within International Law: Evidence of Sonstitutionalism? // European Constitutional Law Review. — 2009. — Vol. 5.
12. de Wet E. and A. Nollkaemper. Review of the Security Council Decisions by National Courts// German Yearbook of International law. — 2002. — Vol. 45.
13. Doehring K. Unlawful Resolutions of the Security Council and their Legal Consequences // Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. — 1997. — Vol. I.
14. European Court of Human Rights’ Official Database «HUDOC» // URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.
15. European Union Law Database «EUR-Lex» // URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu.
16. Fox H. The Law of State Immunity. — Oxford, 2002.
17. Friedmann W., Henkin L., Lissitzyn O. (eds.). Transnational Law in a Changing Society: Essays in Honor of Philip Jessup. — New York, 1972.
18. Gaillard E. and Pingel-Lenuzza I. International Organisations and Immunity from Jurisdiction: to Restrict or to Bypass? // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. — 2002. — Vol. 51.
19. Goodwin-Gill G.S. (eds). The Reality of International Law. — Oxford, 1999.
20. Harlow C. Accountability in the European Union. — Oxford, 2002.
21. Isaac G. Droit Communautaire Général. — Paris: Dalloz-Sirey, 1998.
22. Kloth M. Immunities and the Right of Access to Court under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.
23. Lauterpacht H. The Problem of Jurisdictional Immunities of Foreign States // British Yearbook of International Law. — 1951. — Vol. 28.
24. Muller S. International Organisations and their Host States: Aspects of their Legal Relationship. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.
25. Pingel-Lenuzza I. Les Immunités des états en Droit International. Bruxelles, Bruylant, 1998.
26. Reinisch A. Governance Without Accountability? // German Yearbook of International Law. — 2001. — Vol. 44.
27. Schlemmer-Schulte S. and Tung K-Y. (eds.) Liber Amicorum Ibrahim F.I. Shihata: International Finance and Development Law. Kluwer Law International, 2001.
28. Shaw M. International Law. Cambridge, 4th ed., 1997.
29. Singer M. Jurisdictional Immunity of International Organisations: Human Rights and Functional Necessity Concerns // Virginia Journal of International Law. — 1995. — Vol. 36.
30. Vohrah L. et al (eds). Man’s Inhumanity to Man — Essays in International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese. The Hague, 2003.
31. Wellens K. Fragmentation of International Law and Establishing an Accountability Regime for International Organizations: The Role of the Judiciary in Closing the Gap // Michigan Journal of International Law. — 2004. — Vol. 25.
32. Wellens K. Accountability of International Organisations: Some Salient Features // Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law. — 2003. — Vol. 97