Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Karelova, G.A. Legal force of decisions of the constitutional court of Ukraine on the issues of criminal law

Abstract: The article is devoted to the legal force of decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the issues of criminal law. The author supports the position that legal force of legal acts of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is based upon the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, and the legal positions as enshrined in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine have material legal force, precedent character and they are sources of law, criminal law included.

Keywords:

jurisprudence, criminal law, decisions, legal force, legal positions, constitutional court, source of law, force of law, precedent, the Constitution of Ukraine.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Andrushko P.P. Dzherela krim?nal'nogo prava Ukra?ni: ponyattya, vidi // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 2011. — ¹ 9. — S. 25–41.
2. Vitruk N.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2010. — 592 s.
3. Gergel?ynik V.O. Pravov? problemi stanovlennya ? funkts?onuvannya konstituts?yno? yustits?? Ukra?ni: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — K., 2000. — 18 s.
4. Dudorov O., Danilevs'kiy A. Pro zam?nu smertno? kari dov?chnim pozbavlennyam vol?. Shchodo R?shennya Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni // V?snik prokuraturi. — 2011. — ¹ 6. — S. 72–79.
5. Ebzeev B.S. Konstitutsiya. Pravovoe gosudarstvo. Konstitutsionnyy Sud: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. — M.: Zakon i pravo, YuNITI, 1996. — 349 s.
6. Ebzeev B.S. Tolkovanie Konstitutsii Konstitutsionnym Sudom Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teo-reticheskie i prakticheskie problemy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1998. — ¹ 5. — S. 5–12.
7. Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental'nyy ana-liz. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Prospekt, 2009. — 400 s.
8. Konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ucheb. posobie / Kryazhkov V.A., Laza-rev L.V. — M.: BEK, 1998. — 462 c.
9. Martinenko P. Konstituts?yniy Sud Ukra?ni: povnovazhennya u kontekst? dvor?chnogo dosv?du (kv?ten' 1997 — kv?ten' 1999 roku) // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 1999. — ¹ 4. — S. 46–62.
10. Rab?novich P.M. Pravotlumachennya ? germenevtika (za mater?alami praktiki Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni) // V?snik Akadem?? pravovikh nauk Ukra?ni. — 2006. — ¹ 4. — S. 13–21.
11. Skomorokha V. Okrem? pitannya d?yal'nost? konstituts?yno? yustits?? v Ukra?n? // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 1999. — ¹
12. — S. 4–10. 12. Skomorokha V. Okrem? pitannya pod?lu vladi, viznachennya derzhavno? ta sudovo? vladi, nezalezhnost? sudovo? vladi // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 2000. — ¹ 1. — S. 52–67.
13. Skomorokha V., Pshenichniy ?. Konstituts?yniy kontrol': pitannya rozglyadu sprav, kharakteru ta zm?stu r?shen' Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 1999. — ¹ 1. — S. 51–63.
14. Teslenko M.V. Konstituts?yna yurisdikts?ya v Ukra?n?: navch. pos?bn. — K.: Shkola, 2003. — 256 s.
15. Teslenko M. Pravova priroda akt?v Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 2000. — ¹ 2. — S. 6–9.
16. Tikhiy V. Of?ts?yne tlumachennya Konstituts?? ta zakon?v Ukra?ni Konstituts?ynim Sudom Ukra?ni // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 1998. — ¹ 4. — S. 38–45.
17. Tikhiy V. Povnovazhennya Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni ta pravova priroda yogo r?shen' // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 2006. — ¹ 4. — S. 38–44.
18. Tkachuk P. Pravov? pozits?? Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 2006. — ¹ 2. — S. 10–21.
19. Troper M. Problema tolkovaniya i teoriya verkhovenstva konstitutsii // Sravnitel'noe kon-stitutsionnoe obozrenie. — 2005. — ¹ 4. — S. 171–181.
20. Khabrieva T.Ya. Tolkovanie Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: teoriya i praktika. — M.: Yurist, 1998. — 245 s.
21. Chuchaev A.I. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF // Krim?nal'niy kodeks Ukra?ni 2001 r.: problemi zastosuvannya ? perspektivi udoskonalennya. Progalini u krim?nal'nomu zakonodavstv? (M?zhnarodniy simpoz?um, 12–13 veresnya 2008 r.): tezi ? referati dopov?dey, teksti pov?domlen'. — L'v?v, 2008. — S. 329–334.
22. Shapoval V. Of?ts?yne tlumachennya yak funkts?ya Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni (problemi teor??) // V?snik Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni. — 1999. — ¹ 3. — S. 52–57.
23. Shapoval V. Stanovlennya konstituts?onal?zmu v Ukra?n?: problemi teor?? // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 1998. — ¹ 5. — S. 25–29.
24. Shapoval V. Teoretichn? problemi real?zats?? Konstituts?? Ukra?ni // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 1997. — ¹ 6. — S. 3–8.
25. Shevchuk S. Shchodo obov’yazkovost? r?shen' Konstituts?ynogo Sudu Ukra?ni u kontekst? doktrini sudovogo pretsedentu // Pravo Ukra?ni. — 2000. — ¹ 2. — S. 45–48
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.