Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Nadykto, E. I. Understanding as a Psychological Aspect of Successive Relations

Abstract: The article describes the contents of the understanding phenomenon and its relations with the process of values succession. Analysis of scientific literature on psychology, teaching and philosophy focuses on cultural peculiarities of the West and East (the author studies both verbal and writing sources of knowledge and values). Hermeneutics, gnoseology, language studies, logic and social psychology are viewed as methodological grounds for researching different functions of the understanding process. The author defines peculiarities of the learning and understanding processes as well as factors of narrowing borders of the understanding process as the mechanism of adopting values. The author pays special attention at the analysis of consequences of a growing number of commentaries and interpretations of values and distortion of social rules, principles and standards at intrapersonal, interstate and cultural levels. The author proves that it is possible to regulate the mechanism of succession through the understanding process (socio-cultural level) and self-understanding (personal level).


Keywords:

psychology, society, personality, succession, values, understanding, interpretation, knowledge, self-understanding, stereotype.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Antsupov A.Ya. Rossiyskaya konfliktologiya. Analiticheskiy obzor 607 dissertatsiy. KhKh vek. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2004. 704 s.
2. Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti: kul'turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. 3-e izd. M.: Smysl; Akademiya, 2007. 528 s.
3. Vegas Kh.M. Tsennosti i vospitanie. Kritika nravstvennogo relyativizma. SPb: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; RKhGA, 2007. 225 s.
4. Znakov V.V. Ponimanie v myshlenii, obshchenii, chelovecheskom bytii. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2007. 479 s.
5. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya: problemy i perspektivy. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2005. 448 s.
6. Zolotukhina-Abolina E.V. Sotvorenie mira vnimaniem: podstupy k probleme // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2010. T. XXVI. ¹ 4. S. 177-191.
7. Isaev A.A. Aporiya preemstvennosti: Istoriya filosofii. M.: Rossiysk. gos. gumanit. un-t. 2005. 479 s.
8. Kagan M.S. Izbrannye trudy v VII Tomakh. Tom III: Trudy po problemam teorii kul'tury. SPb: Petropolis, 2007. 756 s.
9. Kasavin I.T. Yazyk — znanie — real'nost'. M.: Al'fa-M, 2011. 352 s.
10. Klimova S.M. N.N. Strakhov v dialogakh s sovremennikami. Filosofiya kak kul'tura ponimaniya. SPb: Ale-teyya, 2010. 208 s.
11. Kotlyarova V. V. Tsennosti: traditsii i aksiologicheskaya paradigma sovremennosti. Shakhty: YuRGUES, 2009. 372 s.
12. Porus V.N. Iskusstvo i ponimanie: sotvorenie smysla // Zabluzhdayushchiysya razum? Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 256-278.
13. Pochagina O.V. Sotsiokul'turnye i sotsiopsikhologicheskie aspekty stareniya naseleniya v KNR // Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2003. ¹ 3. S. 65-78.
14. Riker P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika (Moskovskie lektsii i interv'yu). M.: Academia, 1995. 160 s.
15. Rozanov V.V. O ponimanii. Opyt issledovaniya prirody, granits i vnutrennego stroeniya nauki kak tsel'nogo znaniya. M.: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii Svyatogo Fomy, 2006. 640 s.
16. Strakhov N.N. Mir kak tseloe. M.: Ayris-press: Ayris-didaktika, 2007. 576 s.
17. Sen'ko Yu.V. Pedagogika ponimaniya. M.: Drofa, 2007. 189 s.
18. Fromm E. Kharakter i sotsial'nyy protsess // Psikhologiya lichnosti. Teksty. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1982. S. 48-54.
19. Shul'ga E.S. Ponimanie i interpretatsiya. M.: Nauka, 2008. 318 s.
20. Shchyuts A. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyashchiysya smyslom. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2004. 1056 s