Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Grachev B.V. On correlation between the paradigms of international relation and classical theories of integration

Abstract: This article is dedicated to comparison of the paradigms of the theory of international relations with the theories of classical integration. The principles of two main paradigms, political realism and liberalism, were taken as the basis for comparison with the two classical approaches to integration: federalism and functionalism. The goal of this work is determine whether or not there is a correlation between these theoretical constructs, as well as to test a hypothesis that the international concepts are located on a lower level of political research. This work provides a brief historical review of the establishment of paradigms of the theory of international relations, and determines their fundamental positions. As a result of this research the author demonstrates a secondary nature of the approaches towards integration with regards to the theory of international relations, which means that the theories of integration should be viewed as the byproduct of the highest political theories.


Keywords:

Theories of regional integration, Federalism, Functionalism, Integration theories, Liberalism, Political realism, International relations, Paradigms of international relations, Low-level theories, High-level theories


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Lindberg L.N. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. – London: Oxford University Press, 1963. p. 256
2. Laursen F. Theory and Practice of Regional Integration Jean Monnet // Robert Schuman Paper Series Vol. 8 No. 3. 2008. p. 22.
3. Hörber T. The Foundations of Europe: European Integration Ideas in France, Germany and Britain. Weisbaden: VS Verlag., 2006. p. 116/
4. Haas E.B. International integration: The European and the Universal process // Limits and Problems of European Integration. Hogue, 1963. p. 6-36.
5. Ashworth L.M. A history of international thought. NY: Routledge. – 2014. – 320 p.
6. Ettsioni A. Ot imperii k soobshchestvu. Novyy podkhod k mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam. M., 2004. 384 s.
7. Tsygankov P.A. Metodologiya. Tendentsii klassicheskikh paradigm v zapadnoy teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. ¹ 2. S. 119-130
8. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: Khrestomatiya / Sost., nauch. red. i komment. P.A. Tsygankova. – M.: Gardariki, 2002. 400 s.
9. Libman A.M. Issledovaniya regional'noy integratsii v SNG i Tsentral'noy Azii: Obzor literatury. SPb., 2012. 64 s.
10. Pestsov S.K. Sovremennyy mezhdunarodnyy regionalizm: sravnitel'nyy analiz teorii i praktiki regional'nogo sotrudnichestva i integratsii. dis. … dok. polit. nauk. SPb.: SPBGU, 2006. 422 s.
11. Schmitter P.C. Autonomy or dependence as regional integration outcomes: Central America Institute of International Studies. University of California, 1972. 87 p.
12. Mitrany D. Delusion of regional unity // Limits and Problems of European Integration. Hogue, 1963. p. 37-46
13. Mitrany D. A Working Peace System. Chicago, 1966. p. 221