Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Starkin S.V. Confrontation in Cyberspace in the Context of the Development of Military Strategy

Abstract: The problematic issues raised by the author in this paper, are worded as follows: firstly, what does the concept of "cyberwar" actually mean for the political establishment? Secondly, to what extent is the concept of "cyberwar" applicable for the understanding of global trends, the future of military strategy and instruments for its implementation? The author is conducting a study of the strategic context in which there are currently undergoing debates about "cyberwar" (in particular, the declining value of direct military force perceived by some researches), and also analysing the difficulty of achieving the real strategic effect through "pure" cyber attacks.In this paper, taking into account the objectives, traditional for the humanities comparative methods are used, as well as case studies, and the theory of political decision-making.The main conclusion of the study is that the military cyberpower does not have enough of strategically strong potential, as it was painted in recent years. According to the author, there is every reason to believe that, like military air power, it will be an important element in future joint operations of ground, air and naval forces; but the concept of cyberwar as a strategically crucial form of interstate conflict is misleading and meaningless diversion of efforts and resources on useless objects.


Keywords:

international security, national security, cyber-threats, confrontation in cyberspace, cyberrevolution, cybersecurity, information security, Russia, USA, NATO


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sergunin A.A. KONTsEPT «VOENNAYa BEZOPASNOST'» I EVOLYuTsIYa VOENNO-POLITIChESKOGO MYShLENIYa POSTSOVETSKOY ROSSII // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2012. - 2. - C. 119 - 140. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_183.html
2. Shchuplenkov O.V. Metodologicheskie aspekty natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossii // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2014. - 2. - C. 60 - 110. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2014.2.11662. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_11662.html
3. Arquila J., Ronfeldt D. Cyberwar is Coming / in Arquila and Ronfeldt (eds), In Athena’s Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, – 1997.
4. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 3. - C. 55 - 67.
5. Liddel Gart B. Strategiya nepryamykh deystviy. M., – 2014. – 265 c. Liddel Gart B. Strategiya nepryamykh deystviy. M., – 2014. – 265 c.
6. Clarke R. Cyber War. New York, HarperCollins, – 2010. – 253 p.
7. Klauzevits K. O voyne. V 3-kh t. M., – 2009. – T.1. – 295 s. Klauzevits K. O voyne. V 3-kh t. M., – 2009. – T.1. – 295 s.
8. Adams J. The Next World War. New York, – 1998. – 317 p.
9. Robb J. Brave New War. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, – 2007. – 146 p.
10. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii. M., – 2005. – 316 c. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii. M., – 2005. – 316 c.
11. McMaster H.R. Learning from Contemporary Conflicts to Prepare for Future War // Orbis. – 2008. – vol. 52. – no. 4. – R. 564–584.
12. Information Systems Security / Joint Security Commission, Redefining Security. Washington DC, 28 February 1994. URL: http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/jsc/chap8.html (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
13. Byman D., Waxman M. Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate // International Security. – Spring 2000. – vol. 24. – no. 4. – R. 5–38.
14. Cyberspace Operations. United States Air Force Doctrine Document 3–12. – 15 July 2010. – R. 10. URL: http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/afdd3-12.pdf (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
15. Fuller J.F.C. The Reformation of War. London: Hutchinson, – 1923. URL: http://www.archive.org/stream/reformationofwar00fulluoft /reformationofwar00fulluoft_djvu.txt (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
16. BBC, The Virtual Revolution, Episode 2 ‘The Enemy of the State?’, aired on BBC2, 6 February 2010. URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00n4j0r (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
17. Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde Jaap de. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, – 1998. – 267 p.
18. Betz D. J., Stevens T. Cyberspace and War // Adelphi Series. – 2011. – V. 51:424. – R. 75-98.
19. Hoffman Frank G. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Washington DC: Potomac Institute, – 2007. – 341 p.
20. General Sir David Richards. Future Conflict and Its Prevention: People and the Information Age’, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 18 January 2010. URL: http://www.iiss.org/recent-key-addresses/general-sir-david-richards-address/. (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
21. Kaldor M. New and Old Wars. Cambridge: Polity, – 2006. – 316 p.
22. Nagl J. Let’s Win the Wars We’re In // Joint Force Quarterly. 1st quarter 2009. – no. 52. – R. 20–26.
23. Strachan H. One War, Joint Warfare // RUSI Journal. – 2009. – vol. 154. – ¹. 4. – R. 22-35.
24. Angell N. The Great Illusion. London, – 1910. – 437 p.
25. Holsti K. The State, War and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 1996. – 237 p.
26. Smith R. The Utility of Force. London, – 2005. – 267 p.
27. Strachan H. On War, A Biography. London, – 2007. – 263 p.
28. Lebow R.N. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 2008. – 317 p.
29. Halliday F. The World at 2000: Perils and Promises. London: Palgrave, – 2000. – 139 p.
30. Liang Qiao, Xiangsui Wang. Unresticted Warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House, – February 1999. – 285 p.
31. Cowen T. The Age of the Infovore. London: Penguin, – 2011. – 315 p.
32. Poe M. A History of Communications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 2010. – 273 p.