Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Falaleeva, I. N. The Problems of Managing the Kalmyk People of the Astrakhan Governorate and the Don Host Lands in Comparison

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems of managing the ‘internal’ borderlands of the Russian Empire from the poi of view of the ethnic factor. The author of the given research analyzes differences in the legal status of the Kalmyk people of the Astrakhan Governorate and the Don Host Lands. Based on the comparative analysis of the regulatory acts of the 19th century, the author sets goals to define the influence of the essential (domestic, cultural and economic) factors on the legal regulation of the order of managing ethnic communities of the Volga-Don Region as well as to clarify the management methods and to describe how these are particularly applied to Volga-Don communities. Research methodology is based on the principle of historicism. The research methods include comparative-legal, historical-cultural and situational (concrete historical) methods of critical analysis of sources as well as historiographic critics. The results of the analysis allow to clarify the legal methods of influence on the process of the settlement of the Kalmyks and bringing their status to the status of a country man or a Cossack as a military man. One of such methods was the symbolic change of the names of administrative units while gradually forcing out institutional peculiarities of the military-ancestral organization of nomadic tribes. The author concludes that the legal policy concerning the internal borderlands of the Russian Empire did not have a finalized nature. Strategic tasks aimed at unification of the management of the Kalmyk steppe were solved indirectly through the combination of measures involving the Kalmyk people into a sedentary life style and Orthodoxy. Debates on establishing both tactic and strategic measures provide clear evidence that there were always more than two actors defining the choice of reforms.


Keywords:

trusteeship, polyjuridism, nomadism, the Kalmyks, Cossacks, alien races, national administration, the Buzava (Buzava Kalmyks), legal policy, ethnosubjectivity.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Abeeva O.N. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya politika v otnoshenii kochevnikov Prikaspiya XIX veke//Dialog kul'tur narodov Rossii: otechestvennyy opyt i sovremennost'. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (g. Volgograd, 15-16 oktyabrya 2012) /Pod red. V.N. Ignatova, Yu.D. Grazhdanova, O.A. Vasil'eva. – Volgograd: Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel'stvo, 2013. – 232 s. – S. 67-76.
2. Voropanov V.A. Osushchestvlenie yurisdiktsionnykh funktsiy v bashkirskom soslovii v pervoy polovine XIX veka//Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2014. ¹ 16. S. 3-7.
3. Deev S.Yu. Administrativnye reformy v natsional'nykh okrainakh Rossiyskoy imperii v kontse XIX-nachale XX vv.: na materialakh Kalmykii.-Avtoref. na soiskanie k.i.n. Elista, 2004.
4. Kadio Zh. Laboratoriya imperii: Rossiya/SSSR. 1860-1940 / Per. s fr. E. Kustovoy. – M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010.-336 s.
5. Karnishina N.G. Natsional'nye okrainy Rossiyskoy imperii v seredine KhIKh – nachale KhKh vv.//Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2011. ¹2(18). – S. 22-28.
6. Komandzhaev A.N., Andropov A.N. Razvitie sel'skogo khozyaystva v Kalmykii vo vtoroy polovine XIX veka//Vestnik Kalmytskogo Universiteta. 2013. ¹ 1 (17). – S. 56-63.
7. Korkunov N.M. Russkoe gosudarstvennoe pravo. SPb., 1909 T.1. Izd. 6-e.
8. Ledzhinova N.P. Reforma 1892 goda v Kalmykii: Otmena lichnoy zavisimosti kalmykov-prostolyudinov ot noyonov i zaysangov.-Avtoref. na soiskanie k.i.n. Elista, 2005. s.23.
9. Lomakina I. B. Osobennosti sub'ektnogo sostava obychno-pravovykh otnosheniy v etnicheskoy srede: na primere korennykh narodov Sibiri//Pravovedenie. 2005. ¹ 3.-S. 144 – 150.
10. Miller A.I. 2006. Imperiya Romanovykh i natsionalizm. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 248 s.
11. Sakhanova K.B. Kochevoy khozyaystvennyy tip v Kazakhstane//Vestnik KazGU. Seriya ekonomicheskaya. Almaty, 1998, ¹ 9. URL: http://lib.kazsu.kz/Vestnik/Econom/year98/N9/15.htm. Provereno 20.08.14.
12. Svechnikova L.G. Pravovaya politika Rossiyskoy imperii v natsional'nykh okrainakh // Instituty gosudarstva i prava v ikh istoricheskom razvitii: sbornik nauch. statey k 60-letiyu V.A. Tomsinova. M. «Zertsalo». 2012. – 400s.-S. 182-200.
13. Stalyunas D. Territorializatsiya etnichnosti v Rossiyskoy imperii? Sluchay Avgustovskoy/Suvalkskoy gubernii//Ab imperio. 2011. ¹3.-S. 145-166.
14. Falaleeva I.N Kul'turnaya i pravovaya sub'ektnost' etnosa: istoriko-teoreticheskoe sootnoshenie ponyatiy v XIX v.//Lex Russica. 2014. ¹ 9.-S.1031-1042.
15. Shabley P. Poddanstvo v Aziatskoy Rossii: istoricheskiy smysl i politiko-pravovaya kontseptualizatsiya//Vestnik Evrazii. 2008. ¹ 3. – S. 99-122.
16. Shovunov K.P. Kalmyki v sostave rossiyskogo kazachestva (vtoraya polovina XVII – XIX veka). Elista: Soyuz kazakov Kalmykii. Kalmytskiy institut obshchestvennykh nauk. 1992.-320 s.