Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Tsvetkova, M. V. Refl exive Mechanisms of Subject Relations

Abstract: The present article reveals individual understanding of the essence of refl exive mechanisms and their direct infl uence on subject relations. The author emphasizes the algorithmic weakness of existing approaches to describing refl exive mechanisms which complicates their practical use, fi rst of all in the sphere of research of subject relations. Refl ective mechanisms should be shown in the course of motivation formation through reorganization of self-assessment of a subject. Therefore the author expands the defi nition of the refl exive mechanism as a procedure of detection of compliances of representations by applying assessment and evaluation to both compliances and reactions to them. Based on the analysis of various models of refl ection the author of the present article defi nes and classifi es working refl exive mechanisms. At the same time stages of the process of refl ection are considered. The author also focuses on the need for introduction of assessment procedures of mechanisms and offers and describes particular procedures for assessing refl ective mechanisms. The author of the article proves the importance and signifi cance of refl ective mechanisms of self-assessment due to their mathematical constructibility in studying subject relations. The type of refl ection used by a subject as a strategy of behavior, confl ict or cooperation, has the greatest importance. Thus, the results of the present research may help to better understand the category of refl exive mechanisms and their role in the organization of subject relations and self-knowledge processes. This seems to be a rather promising direction for future researches.

Keywords:

refl ection, refl ective mechanisms, subject relations, evaluation systems, psychological image, perception, selfknowledge, self-assessment, representations, refl ective control, political subjects.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Arshinov V. I., Svirskiy Ya. I. Rekursivnyy sub'ekt v modelyakh Vselennoy Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 2010 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr»,
2. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Gruppovaya refleksivnost': osnovnye podkhody i perspektivy issledovaniy. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, Institut psikhologii. M., 2011 tom 33, ¹ 4
3. Znakov V.V. Samoponimanie sub'ekta kak kognitivnaya i ekzistentsial'naya problema // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2005. T. 26, N 1. S. 18–28.
4. Kuznetsov V.Yu. Sdvig ot klassiki k neklassike i narashchivanie poryadkov refleksii v filosofii Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 2009 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr»
5. Leont'ev D.A. Averina A.Zh. Fenomen refleksii v kontekste problemy samoregulyatsii // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. N 2(16).
6. Lepskiy V.E. Tekhnologii upravlyaemogo khaosa – oruzhie razrusheniya sub'ektnosti razvitiya // Informatsionnye voyny. 2010, N4. S.69-78.
7. Lefevr V.A . Algebra sovesti/Per. s angl.-M.,»Kogito-Tsentr», 2003
8. Lefevr V.A. Chto takoe odushevlennost'?-M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2013. – 125 s.
9. Lefevr, V. A., i Tarasenko, S. Ustanovki. Konsensus. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie, 2011,11, 1-2, str. 63-66
10. Matsevich I.Ya. Sistemnyy analiz samoorganizatsii kreativnoy industrii. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 17-18 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2013. – 330 s.
11. Naydenov M. I. Protsedury upravleniya refleksivnymi protsessami kak sintez klassicheskoy i postneklassicheskoy nauchnoy ratsional'nosti. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 17-18 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2013. – 330 s.
12. Nikonov Yu. V. O modelirovanii fazovykh perekhodov v sotsial'nykh setyakh s uchetom eticheskikh sistem V.A. Lefevra. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 17-18 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2013. – 330 s.
13. Novikov D.A., Chkhartishvili A.G. Refleksivnye igry. – M.: SINTEG, 2003
14. Organizatsiya samorazvivayushchikhsya innovatsionnykh sred / Pod red. V.E.Lepskogo – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2012. – 192 s.
15. Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 17-18 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2013. – 330 s.
16. Rossokhin A.V. Refleksiya i vnutrenniy dialog v izmenennykh sostoyaniyakh soznaniya. Intersoznanie v psikhoanalize. M.: Kogito-tsentr, 2010.
17. Rubinshteyn S.L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii. – SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 720 s
18. Tarasenko S.S. Obzor noveyshikh rezul'tatov teorii refleksivnykh igr. Sbornik materialov IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma 17-18 oktyabrya 2013 g., Moskva / Otv. red. V.E.Lepskiy – M.: «Kogito-Tsentr», 2013. – 330 s.
19. Sharov A.S. Ontologiya refleksii: priroda, funktsii i mekhanizmy // Refleksivnyy podkhod: ot metodologii k praktike / pod red. V.E.Lepskogo. M.: Kogito-tsentr, 2009. S. 112–132.
20. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Myshlenie. Ponimanie. Refleksiya. M.: Nasledie MMK, 2005.
21. Csikszentmihalyi M. Introduction // A Life Worth Living: Contributions to Positive Psychology / M.Csikzentmihalyi, I.S.Csikzentmihalyi (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 3–14.
22. Lefebvre V.A., Popper K.R. Research on Bipolarity and Reflexivity Edwin Mellen Press Limited, 2006. – P.144.
23. Nolen-Hoeksema S., Wisco B.E., Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking Rumination // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. Vol. 3, N 5. P. 400–424.
24. Ryabushkina T.M. Refleksiya kak metod samopoznaniya: k voprosu o krizise osnovaniy kartezianskoy i postkartezianskikh teoriy sub'ektivnosti // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 1. - C. 1 - 59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.1.268. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_268.html
25. Markin A.V. Faktory pravovoy refleksiii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 338 - 374. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.562. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_562.html
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.