Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Shipovskaya, L. P., Gemonov, A. V. Philosophical Interpretation of Heraldic Symbols in Pre-Mongolian Russia

Abstract: The article represents an attempt to carry out philosophical analysis of heraldic symbols in ancient Russia before the Mongol Yoke. The authors of the article underline that a very efficient method of philosophical analysis in this sphere is the semiotic approach that allows to revealthe symbolic grounds of culture and human behavior in a society. The authors also touch upon the social-phenomenological approach and Jungian psychoanalytical conception as rather heuristic methods for philosophical discourse of heraldic symbols in pre-Mongolian Russia. The subject of philosophical analysis is the symbols of trident andbident that were shown on prints of ancient Russian knyazhes. Standard semiotic analysis which involves determination of the signifier, the signified and the referent (according to Umberto Eco’s methodological scheme) is complemented with philosophical and culturological interpretation of ‘three’ – the number that was represented in different cultural phenomena: Pythagorean numerology, Christian religion, and Hegel’s philosophy. Apart from that the author makes a hypothesis about analogy between the trident and the symbol of scythe or sickle on Medieval paintings. Another aspect of analyzing heraldic symbols of pre-Mongolian Russia is the color symbols shown in these paintings. At the end of the article the authors note that being the phenomenon of ancient Russian culture, heraldic symbols revealed the world view of our ancestors and their mentality that had an archetype nature.


Keywords:

symbol, heraldic, coat of arms, archetypes, semiotics, trident, mentality, culture, triad, symbolism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
2. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie/Sost., vstup. st. i prim. L.A. Sugay.-M.: Respublika, 1994.-528s. – (Mysliteli XX v.)
3. Galanin A.V. Ariyskie traditsii // Vselennaya zhivaya [Elektronnyy resurs] – Vladivostok, 2012-2013. Adres dostupa:http://ukhtoma.ru/traditions1.htm
4. Gareeva E.A. Ranniy nemetskiy romantizm kak sintez konechnogo i beskonechnogo // Vestnik VEGU. 2010. ¹ 3. c. 63-67.
5. Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977. 703 s.
6. Daniel' S. Iskusstvo videt'. SPb. 2006. Str.111-112
7. Ivanov V.V., Toporov V.N. K rekonstruktsii Mokoshi kak zhenskogo personazha v slavyanskoy versii osnovnogo mifa. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.drevnosti.org/pagan/37-myth/201-2010-05-30-09-31-10
8. Itten I. Iskusstvo tsveta/Per. s nemetskogo; 6-e izdanie; Pred. L. Monakhovoy.-M.: Izd. D. Aronov, 2010.
9. Zaytsev A.S. Nauka o tsvete i zhivopis'.-M.: Iskusstvo, 1986.
10. Kul'tin S. E. Bessmertie: illyuziya ili real'nost'? // Filosofskie nauki-¹9,-1991.
11. Lakier A.B. Russkaya geral'dika [Elektronnyy resurs]. Adres dostupa: .http://www.heraldrybooks.ru/text.php?id=90
12. Meditsinskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / V. I. Borodulin, A. V. Bruena, Yu. Ya. Vengerov i dr.: Pod red. V. I. Borodulina – M., Izdat. Dom «Oniks 21 vek», 2002 – 704 s.
13. Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury.-M.: Universitetskaya kniga. 2012. 406 s. S. 311.
14. Nitsshe F. Sumerki kumirov ili kak filosofstvuyut molotom // Nitsshe F. Stikhotvoreniya. Filosofskaya proza – SPb.: Khudozh. Lit., 1993 g.-672 s.
15. Rybakov B.A. Yazychestvo drevnikh slavyan – M.: Nauka, 1994. 610 s.
16. Sarab'yanov V.D., Smirnova E.S. Istoriya drevnerusskoy zhivopisi. M.: Pravoslavnyy Svyato-Tikhvinskiy gumanitarnyy universitet. 2007. 750 s.
17. Soboleva N.A. Ocherki istorii rossiyskoy simvoliki. Ot tamgi do simvolov gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur: Znak, 2006.-487 s.
18. Freyd Z. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya // Freyd Z. Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1990 g. – 448 s.
19. Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka – M.: Respublika, 1992 g. – 430 s.
20. Khaydegger M. Vremya i bytie – M.: Respublika, 1993g. – 447 s.
21. Shopengauer A. Smert' i ee otnoshenie k nerazrushimosti nashego sushchestva // Metafizika polovoy lyubvi-SPb.: Azbuka-klassika,-2005 g. – 224 s.
22. Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s
23. Yung K.G. Chelovek i ego simvoly – M.: Serebryanye niti, 2011. 352 s.
24. Yung K.G. Noymann E. Psikhoanaliz i iskusstvo – M.: Vakler, 1998. 306 s.
25. Eko. U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu – SPB.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. – 432 s. S. 51
26. Elias N. Pridvornoe obshchestvo. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. 314 s.
27. Kalevi Kull: Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones // Cognitive semiotics. Issue 4-Spring 2009-Anthroposemiotics vs. Biosemiotics
28. Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
29. Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
30. «The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buffolo London. S. 153