Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Kochetkov,V.V. Russian Elitology: Science or ideology?

Abstract: This article demonstrates that, epistemologically, modern Russian elitology is not a science, but rather an ideology, which explains, and thus legitimates the dominance of the ruling elite. To have an epistemological status of an academic discipline, or a science, any social and humanitarian research requires several functions to be exercised. It needs to explain the motives and the aftermath of people’s actions in the past and in the future, shed light on the probabilities of the future and formulate goals to which they must aspire to. Thus, to become a science, a social and humanitarian theory must not only explain and describe the past and predict the future, but it also must formulate ideals and goals for the society. The author points out that Russian elitology does not match those criteria, because it only explains the mechanisms of the dominance of elites. To become a science, elitology must build a foundation of Public Law constitutionalist ethics which would allow evaluating the results of the ruling elite’s actions.


Keywords:

Philosophy, elitology, ideology, science, constitutionalism, public law ethics, axiology, ethos, dominance, elite.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Amal'rik A. prosushchestvuet li Sovetskiy soyuz do 1984 goda? //www.vehi.net/politika/amalrik/html
2. Ashin G.K. Elitologiya: Istorii, teoriya, sovremennost'. M.: Izd-vo «MGIMO-Universitet», 2010.
3. Berdyaev N. A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma. Parizh, 1955
4. Voslenskiy M. Nomenklatura: Gospodstvuyushchiy klass Sovetskogo soyuza. M.: Zakharov, 2005
5. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Opredelenie osnovnykh ponyatiy elitologii.// Polis.2000. ¹ 4
6. Gudkov L.D., Dubin B.V., Levada Yu.A. Problemy «elity» v segodnyashney Rossii: Razmyshleniya nad rezul'tatami sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. M.: Fond «Liberal'naya missiya», 2007
7. Kochetkov V.V. Mnimyy konstitutsionalizm v Rossii v nachale KhKh veka.// Federalizm. 2012. ¹ 2, ss. 57-68
8. Kochetkov V.V. Sotsial'nyy vopros i konstitutsionalizm.// Polis. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 152-163.
9. Kochetkov V.V., Kochetkova L.N. K voprosu o genezise postindustrial'nogo obshchestva.// Voprosy filosofii. 2011. ¹ 2. S. 23-33.
10. Kryshtanovskaya O. Antologiya rossiyskoy elity. M.: Zakharov, 2005.
11. Mikhel's R. Neobkhodimost' organizatsii.// Dialog. 1990. ¹ 3
12. Moska G. Pravyashchiy klass.// Sotsis. 1994. ¹ 10
13. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T.40.
14. Ostrogorskiy M.Ya. Demokratiya i politicheskie partii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010.
15. Partiynoe stroitel'stvo. Uchebnoe posobie. Izd. 6-e. M.: Politizdat, 1981.
16. Sakharov A.D. O strane i mire. N'yu-York, 1975
17. Trotskiy L.B. Predannaya revolyutsiya. M.: Izdatel'stvo NII kul'tury Ministerstva kul'tury RSFSR. 1991.
18. Lasswell H.D. Power and Personality. Norton: The Norton Library. 1976
19. Pareto V. Sociological Writings. London: Pall Mall Press. 1966.
20. Pareto V. The Mind and Society. Vol. 3. New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1963
21. Wittfogell K. Oriental Despotism. New Haven: Yale University Press. 196