
	Politics and Society Reference: Bobokhonov, R. S. Customary Law in the Public Life of Mountain Tajiks (XX Century) // Politics and Society. 2012. № 3. P. 119-132. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53877 Bobokhonov, R. S. Customary Law in the Public Life of Mountain Tajiks (XX Century) Abstract: In this paper we fi rst study the remnants of the institute “customary law” in the modern Tajik society, both in terms of legal science (Roman law, the modern fi eld of law) as well as historical and ethnographic sciences. During a comprehensive study of this interesting subject the author noted the following specifi c points: fi rst, the rules of customary law in the mountain Tajiks have very deep historical roots, and secondly, a strong ideological struggle of the state in Soviet times to oust them from a life not been successful; in Third, some rules of “Sharia” transformed under the infl uence of customary law, rather than on turnover, in the fourth, in Soviet times, mostly eradicated norm “Sharia” in the everyday life of mountain Tajiks. Keywords: legal system, “Odate, ” customary law, Roman law, liability law, family law, real law, Muslim law, etc. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Bogolepov I.O. O formal'nykh ogranicheniyakh svobody zaveshchaniy v rimskoy klassicheskoy yurispruden- 2. tsii. M.,1881. 3. Gusakov A. Delikty i dogovory kak istochniki obyazatel'stv v sisteme tsivil'nogo prava drevnego Rima. 4. M., 1896. 5. Dozhdev D.V. Rimskoe arkhaicheskoe nasledstvennoe pravo. M.,1993. 6. Dozhdev D.V. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo. M: INFRA M – NORMA,1997. 7. Dormidontov G. Sistema rimskogo prava. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Kazan',1915. 8. Efimov V.V. Lektsii po istorii rimskogo prava. SPb.,1898. 9. Zagurskiy L. Brak i konkubinat u rimlyan. Khar'kov,1883. 10. Zagurskiy L. Uchenie ob ottsovskoy vlasti po rimskomu pravu. Khar'kov,1885. 11. Zom R. Institutsii rimskogo prava. SPb.,1910. 12. Koran / Per. s arabskogo I. Yu. Krachkovskogo. M.,1963. 13. Kofanov L.L. Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo v arkhaicheskom Rime: Dolgovoy vopros(VI – IV vv. do n.e.). 14. M.,1994. 15. Maretsoll' F. Uchebnik rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. M.,1867. 16. Muromtsev S.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo drevnego Rima. M.,1883. 17. Nikol'skiy B. Darenie mezhdu suprugami, 1. SPb.,1903. 18. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo. Pod red. Novitskogo I.B., Preterskogo I.S.M: Minyust,1948. 19. Sal'kovskiy K. Instituttsii. Osnovy sistemy i istorii rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Kiev,1910. 20. Khammudakh Abdalati. Islam kakoy on est'. Baku: Azerbaydzhanskaya Gosudarstvennaya Knizhnaya Palata, 21. 1999. 22. Khvostov V.M. Istoriya rimskogo prava. M., 1919. 23. Bauer K. Die “Rutiliana constitutio” des Julian. – TR, 54, 1986, p.97-100. 24. Cannata C.A. Appunti sulla impossibilita sopravvenuta f la “culpa debitoris” nelle jbbligazioni da “stipulatio in 25. dando”. – SDHI, 32, 1966, p.63-128. 26. Cardilli R. L’obbligazione di “praestare” e la responsabilita contrattuale in diritto romano (II sec. a. C. – II sec. 27. d. C.). Milano, 1995. 28. De Robertis F. I limiti spaziali al potere del “pater familias”. – Labeo, 29, 1983, p.164-174. 29. Giuffre` V. La “substantia debitoris” tra “corpus” e “bona”. – Praesidia libertatis. Garantismo e sistemi processuali 30. nell`esperienza di Roma republicana. Napoli, 1994, p.267-298. 31. Johnston D. The Roman law of trusts. Oxford, 1988. 32. Manfreddini A. La Volonta oltre le morte. Profi li di diritto ereditario romano. Torino, 1991. 33. Manthe U. Das “senatusconsultum Pegasianum”. Berlin, 1989. 34. Provera G. Rifl essioni sul “benefi cium cedendarum actionum”. – Studi C.Sanfi lippo, IV. Milano, 1987, 35. p.609-659. 36. Voci P. Storia della “patria potestas” da Augusto a Diocleziano. – Iura, 31, 1980, p.164-174.

Journals

Books

Bobokhonov, R. S. Customary Law in the Public Life of Mountain Tajiks (XX Century)