|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Politics and Society
Reference:
Belkovich, R. Yu.
Political Commitment and Private Autonomy
// Politics and Society.
2011. ¹ 5.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=53726
Belkovich, R. Yu. Political Commitment and Private AutonomyAbstract: The article is devoted to the problem of liability of norms created by the government, in the context of the political commitment theory. The author criticizes the idea of a prior commitment of the civil law in the light of such values as freedom and private autonomy. Keywords: law, commitment, presumption, legitimacy, legality, constitution, violence, monopoly, autonomy, enforcement.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Platon. Kriton.
2. Charvet J. Political Obligation: Individualism and Communitarism / On Political Obligation. Ed. by Harris P. 3. London, 1990. Pp. 65-88. 4. Gilbert M. A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford, 5. 2006. 6. Horton J. In Defense of Associative Political Obligations: Part One // Political Studies. Vol. 54. 2006. Pp. 7. 427–43. 8. Horton J. In Defense of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two // Political Studies. Vol. 55. 2007. Pp. 1–19. 9. Beran H. The Consent Theory of Political Obligation. London, 1987. 10. Steinberger P. The Idea of the State. Cambridge, 2004. 11. Barnett R.E. Constitutional Legitimacy // Columbia Law Review. Vol.103, No.1. 2003. Pp. 111-148. 12. Wolff R.P. In Defense of Anarchism. New York, 1970. 13. Gans C. Philosophical Anarchism and Political Obedience. Cambridge, 1992. 14. Fedotov A. V. Ponyatie i klassifikatsiya dokazatel'stvennykh prezumptsiy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 15. ¹4. 2001. S. 45 - 55. 16. Pitkin H. Obligation and Consent – I // American Political Science Review. ¹59. 1965. Pp. 990-999. 17. Bel'kovich R.Yu. Problema politicheskogo obyazatel'stva v kontekste teorii obshchestvennogo dogovora / 18. Parlamentarizm: problemy teorii, istorii, praktiki. M., 2010. C. 119—125. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
