Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shakhbazyan S.V. Criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Abstract: This article examines the criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF. The author carefully examines such aspects as consequences of the conciliation of parties in the case of changing the category of a crime; application of the positions from Article 11 of the CCRF in cases of changes in the category of a crime; limits of the authority of the cassation court during implementation of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF; changes to the category of a crime during criminal hearing in accordance with Chapter 40.1 of the Criminal Procedural Code and during execution of the verdict, and the issue of changes to the category of a crime should be resolved via cassation or supervisory method. The main conclusion of the research is the fact that due to the application of the Criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation arises a number of criminal law and criminal procedure issues, which can produce corruption in the work of the courts during the assessment of the gravity of a crime. Criminal law and criminal procedure aspects of the application of Part 6 of the Article 15 of the CCRF expands the boundaries of the principle of judicial discretion and defines a dispositional regulation of the criminal legal relations.  

Keywords:

court of cassation, reconciliation of parties, convict, suspended sentence, factual circumstances, correctional institution, probationary early release, judicial discretion, crime category, criminal record

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. N.E. Mullakhmetova. Primirenie storon pri izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
2. A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3. S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch.6 st. 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
5. A.N. Kravtsova. Predely polnomochiy suda kassatsionnoy instantsii po primeneniyu chasti 6 stat'i 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Kudryavtseva A.V., Voronin Yu.A. Ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty izmeneniya kategorii prestupleniy v sootvetstvii s ch. 6 st. 15 UK RF // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo". N 20(279). Vyp. 30. S. 50.
7. L.V. Vinitskiy. M.E. Kubrikova. Vozmozhno li izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del v poryadke glavy 40.1 UPK RF? SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2013. N 8.
9. A.L. Ivanov. Rekomendatsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF o primenenii ch 6 stat'i 15 UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. A.V. Grinenko. Kategorizatsiya prestupleniy i polozheniya obshchey chasti ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stv. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. A.A. Khaydarov. Pravo suda izmenit' kategoriyu prestupleniya na menee tyazhkuyu. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
13. M.F. Mingalimova. Neyasnost' v prakticheskom primenenii novykh polozheniy obshchey chasti UK. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
14. Postanovlenie ot 29 maya 2014 g. N 9. O praktike naznacheniya i izmeneniya sudami vidov ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15. T.D. Ustinova. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' i ee vliyanie (uchet) pri konstruirovanii norm obshchey chasti UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
16. N.E. Mullakhmetova. Uchet mneniya i poluchenie soglasiya poterpevshego pri prinyatii protsessual'nykh resheniy. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
17. V.V. Pitetskiy. O nedostatkakh voploshcheniya printsipa spravedlivosti v deystvuyushchem Ugolovnom kodekse RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
18. V.V. Pitetskiy. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestupleniy i printsip spravedlivost. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
19. S.I. Nikulin. Voprosy primeneniya ch.6 st. 15 UK RF. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
20. Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 91.
21. Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. N 8. S. 50.
22. Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57.
23. Dzhagrunov A.A. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy i protivorechiya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. N 8-1. S. 80-81.
24. Larina L.Yu. K voprosu ob izmenenii sudom kategorii prestupleniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2013. N 2. S. 57-58.
25. Bavsun M.V. Sudebnoe usmotrenie pri naznachenii nakazaniya i problemy ego ogranicheniya v UK RF // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2007. N 9. S. 105-106
26. Laktaeva A.Yu. Garantii i vozmozhnosti realizatsii printsipa ravenstva pri naznachenii nakazaniya // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2011. N 75. S. 66.
27. Martyshkin V.N., Gavin A.S., Dement'eva T.A. Pravovye i nravstvennye kriterii sudebnogo usmotreniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2008. N 1. S. 21.
28. G.A. Trofimova. Printsip sudebnogo usmotreniya: rasshirenie granits pravoprimeneniya. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
29. Yu.Yu. Semin. S.V. Plokhov. Implementatsiya mezhdunarodnykh norm-protsess slozhnyy. O privedenii zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi standartami ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.