Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Bel'kovich R.Yu. Secession and the meta-language of law

Abstract: Secession represents a phenomenon that has existed throughout the entire history of a national state within the Westphalian system of international relations. Despite the prolonged existence of this phenomenon, its status in the legal field remains undefined. The author strives to demonstrate that secession cannot really be considered a phenomenon that exists within law as conceptually it represents the “end of law”. The research leans on the traditional within the global science analysis of the issue of secession in the context of moral philosophy. The author comes to the conclusion that the positive law represents not only the system of normative rules, but a sort of a meta-language, which defines the boundaries of possible reasoning not only about these rules, but also the relations they regulate. Secession demonstrates a gap that exists between society and the government, and attempts to liquidate this gap. Secession is not the “right” of a nation or separate individuals, rather a form of self-determination, which precedes any right.


Keywords:

territorial integrity, Westphalian system, meta-language, violence, self-determination, monopoly, sovereignty, secession, coercion, civil society


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bel'kovich R.Yu. Dve voyny za nezavisimost': Avraam Linkol'n i problema setsessii // Dialog so vremenem. ¹49. 2014. S. 218-235.
2. Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoy filosofii prava / Marks K. Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda i drugie rannie filosofskie raboty. M., 2010.
3. Catala A. Remedial Theories of Secession and Territorial Justification // Journal of Social Philosophy. Vol.44. No.1. 2013. Pp. 74-94.
4. Gauthier D. Breaking Up: An Essay on Secession // Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Vol.24. 1994. Pp. 357-372.
5. Hirschman A.O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, 1970.
6. Horowitz D.L. Self-Determination: Politics, Philosophy, and Law / National Determination and Secession. Ed. by Margaret Moore. Oxford, 1998. Pp. 181-214.
7. Merry S.E. Legal Pluralism // Law & Society Review. Vol.22. No.5. 1988. Pp. 869-896.
8. Moore M. The Ethics of Nationalism. Oxford, 2001.
9. Wellman C.H. A Theory of Secession. N.Y., 2005.