Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

The fourth energy transition in the global energy sector: technological and energy sovereignty of Russia.

Sizov Andrei Andreevich

PhD in Technical Science

Head of the Board of Directors, JSC "LOESK"

142074, Russia, Moscow region, Domodedovo, Akulinino village, 77b

lohnagar24@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2023.4.43485

EDN:

XZHTIO

Received:

02-07-2023


Published:

12-10-2023


Abstract: The article examines the current situation in the global energy sector, which is quite legitimately considered the fourth energy transition. The modern world has been teetering on the edge of a global energy crisis in recent years. It is somewhat paradoxical that such a situation is largely provoked by the policy of a number of leading states (primarily European ones) aimed at abandoning carbon and nuclear energy. On the other hand, it is the accelerated growth of investments in the development of generating capacities using solar and wind energy that is considered as a way to overcome the crisis and achieve energy security. The fourth energy transition, associated with the widespread use of renewable energy sources, represents a definite challenge for the Russian economy both from a technological point of view and from the position of the export–import balance. The main conclusions of the study are that the fourth energy transition, associated with the widespread use of renewable energy sources, represents a definite challenge for the Russian economy both from a technological point of view and from the position of the export-import balance. With a competent energy policy, Russia has every chance to pass the stage of the fourth energy transition in a balanced and gradual manner: without going to the extremes of the "green agenda" and not lagging technologically behind the leading countries of the world, combining the tasks of providing the state's economy with cheap energy with new technological breakthroughs. which will allow the country to maintain economic stability, even in the event of a global change in the technical and economic structure.


Keywords:

energy transfer, renewable energy sources, global energy crisis, carbon footprint, Investments in energy, Energy sovereignty, Technological sovereignty, structure of ellectricity generation, International energy agency, Hydropower potential of Russia

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

Since the era of the industrial revolution and throughout the subsequent history of mankind, the factor of stability in providing energy resources to the growing world economy has been the most important parameter of global development. However, the principles of this provision, approaches to it, are not constant and are subject to both techno-economic, environmental, social, and political factors of influence. Particular and complex changes in these factors give rise to new global trends in energy development, called energy transitions.

Energy transition is a significant change in the entire energy system due to a new combination of resources used, as well as transformations in the structure of the system, its scale, economy, behavior of end users and the goal setting of a new energy policy. It is advisable to define an energy transition as a change in the state of the energy system, as opposed to a change in a separate energy technology or fuel source. [1] Even a superficial retrospective analysis of the history of world energy makes it obvious that over the past 250 years, three global structural changes in world energy have occurred in the world, causing changes in the industrial and social structure, as well as political views and ideologies. The most striking example is the transition from a pre-industrial system based on the energy of burned biomass (firewood, straw, peat) and other renewable energy sources (wind, water, muscle power) to an industrial system characterized by widespread mechanization (steam energy), and, consequently, the use of more calorific fossil fuels.

Research objectives and methods

The purpose of this study is to review the current situation in the global energy sector, which, according to a number of signs, can be characterized as the fourth energy transition and to identify Russia's weaknesses and strengths in this process. 

The methodological basis of the research, in addition to traditional general scientific analytical methods, is based on the use of historical and institutional approaches, as well as elements of content analysis of normative documents and secondary statistical data. 

The relevance of the topic under consideration lies in the fact that issues related to the global transformation of the world energy system affect Russia's strategic interests. Energy security for the Russian Federation as a northern (and therefore energy-intensive) state has always been an issue of existential importance, in addition, over the past half century, energy carriers have been the main article of Russian exports, the main source of foreign exchange earnings, the branch of specialization of the state in the international division of labor. Sustainability and high resource availability of Russian energy is an absolute plus, but this fact should not lull vigilance and ignore innovative global trends.

Research results

The term "energy transition" has had a different definition for several decades of its existence. It was first used in the USA after the first oil shock of 1973. It was popularized by US President Jimmy Carter in his speech from the Oval Office on April 18, 1977 [2], in which he called for "looking back in history to understand our energy problem. Twice in the last few hundred years, people have changed the way they use energy... Since we are now running out of gas and oil, we must quickly prepare for the third change (change or transition)- to the strict conservation and resumption of the use of coal, as well as to permanent renewable energy sources, such as solar energy." As the historian Duccio Basosi emphasizes, after the second oil shock of 1979 during the United Nations conference in Nairobi in the summer of 1981, the term "energy transition" received a global definition as a transition to new and renewable energy sources.[3]

At the moment, there are four energy transitions in the history of energy, and, at the current stage of development, humanity is just at the beginning of the fourth.

· the first energy transition – from biomass (firewood, charcoal, household and agricultural waste, etc.) to fossil fuels, primarily coal (the share of coal in primary energy production in 1840 was no more than 5%, in 1900 – 50%);

· the second energy transition is an increase in the share of oil in primary energy (1915 – 3%, 1975 – 45%);

· the third energy transition is the expansion of gas use (1930 – 3%, 2017 – 23%);

· the fourth energy transition is the transition to renewable energy sources (RES): wind energy, solar energy, internal heat of the Earth, etc. (2017 – 3% more than 7% by 2023 (in some countries more than 50% of electricity consumption is provided by RES).

The prerequisites for the fourth energy transition were laid back in the 1980s and 90s.  However, it was only in the second decade of the XXI century that technologies made it possible to achieve competitively acceptable cost levels of renewable energy sources and make them a really real alternative to traditional sources.

 By the end of the first decade of the 21st century, global climate changes have become apparent. According to one of the versions prevailing among the apologists of "green energy", climate warming is a consequence of anthropogenic impact, expressed in a significant increase in the use of carbon-containing energy resources. The rapidly growing emission of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide and methane) on a global scale is becoming critical, at the same time, the uneven distribution of traditional energy resources carries a potential threat to the energy security of developed countries.

The adoption of the Paris Agreement at the 2015 UN Climate Change Conference implies the commitments undertaken by developed countries to accelerate the energy transition to carbon-free energy, ensuring zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The declared goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving carbon neutrality has not been canceled. No country, including Russia, has yet announced that it is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement. The goal remains, but the ways and pace of its achievement are different for individual countries, based on the situation: the energy needs of the economy, the cost of energy, the external trade balance, geopolitical interests, etc. For Russia today it is important to determine how this goal corresponds to medium- and long-term objectives of sustainable development, including the objectives of achieving technological sovereignty in the energy sector and guaranteed provision of consumers with cheap and affordable energy resources. From the point of view of our country, a significant share of the external trade balance of which is the export of hydrocarbons, the completion of the 4th energy transition on a global scale potentially entails a serious economic challenge in terms of the export-import trade balance, budget filling, stability of the national currency, economic and, as a consequence, political weight on the world stage.

The modern energy sovereignty of Russia is based on substantial reserves and the comparative cheapness of fossil hydrocarbon fuels, technologies and scientific and practical developments in the use of nuclear energy, significant hydropower potential of the country's territory. The energy security of the Russian economy is the key not only to the country's competitiveness in the world markets of energy-intensive products, but also to social stability, defense capability and the very existence of the state, the life support of its population in an extremely cold (in comparison with the vast majority of countries) climate. A certain concern is caused by the technological side of the issue: energy based on the use of renewable energy (with the exception of hydro) in Russia is characterized by low efficiency and high cost and, as a result, low investment attractiveness.  This state of affairs does not contribute to the establishment of R&D institutes in the country in the field of renewable energy use, which threatens to potentially lag behind the leading world powers in the energy sector. This issue will become very acute if the pace of the fourth energy transition remains even at the current level, and its geography expands significantly. However, at the momentRussia remains the leading energy power, the neutralization of its competitive advantages is possible only through the use of instruments of geopolitical pressure. It is quite legitimate to consider the current situation from the angle of "there would be no happiness, but misfortune helped." In case of successful mass passage of the fourth energy transition by the leading world powers, the country will have to solve the problem of changing the structure of exports and be ready for possible world agreements discriminating against both hydrocarbon energy and industrial products produced with its participation. 

When making forecasts for the next three decades, power engineers are ready mainly to discuss the technological aspect and give quantitative estimates on it based on the prospects for improving existing and mastering the technologies being developed. A competent forecast of the expected composition and scale of application of new energy technologies in the period up to 2050 was once proposed by the International Energy Agency (IEA.)[4]

In its report and the list of technologies, the IEA focuses on expanding the use of renewable energy sources, increasing their availability and distribution, with a general trend towards technologies of the fourth energy transition. At the same time, it is worth noting separately the unique role of Russia in such conditions. In addition to the colossal reserves of traditional hydrocarbon energy sources, Russia, unlike most of the world's leading energy powers, has a significant resource of unused hydropower potential, which can be the key to ensuring energy transfer and reducing the carbon footprint in our country.

At the same time, the IEA in its report of December 2022 [5] predicts a radical change in the structure of the balance of electricity production. According to the Agency's forecast, renewable energy sources (RES) (including traditional hydropower) will bypass coal by 2025 and become the main supplier of electricity on the planet. At the same time, by 2027, RES will account for about 38-40% of all electricity produced in the world.  According to this forecast, the growth rate of the share of RES will almost double compared to the period 2016-2021.

The flagships of electricity generation using renewable energy will remain China, the EU, the USA, which India is likely to join. These countries properly implement existing measures to stimulate the development of renewable energy and carry out market and regulatory reforms. At the same time, the share of coal, natural gas and nuclear power plants in the energy balance of these states will continue to decline.

The IEA expects that by 2027, the world will have new capacities for the production of electricity from renewable energy in the amount of 2,400 GW compared to 2022, which roughly corresponds to the total generating capacity of modern China. "In the next five years, there will be as much renewable energy in the world as in the last 20 years," said Fatih Birol, head of the IEA.

The trends of the fourth energy transition have become more pronounced in the light of the aggravation of the situation in Ukraine and the global energy crisis that began in 2022. The rapid growth in the development of wind and solar energy is perfectly illustrated by the latest dynamics of investments in this industry (For example, the International Energy Agency (IEA) notes by November 2022 a multiple increase in investments in renewable energy compared to previous years to the level of $ 1.145 trillion. Only in 2022 there was an actual doubling of investments in the development of "clean" 1). According to further forecasts of the IEA, their volume will double again by 2030, exceeding the level of $2 trillion per year at current prices.

 

 

 

Fig. 1 Investments in renewable energy accumulated since the beginning of the year, billion US dollars, according to the IEA

 

At the same time, it should be understood that the volumes of investments in renewable and low-carbon energy indicated by the IEA in practice account for 90% of developed countries, primarily China, the USA and EU countries. Thus, at the moment, we can state a growing differentiation between the Global North switching to carbon-free energy and the countries of the Global South increasing the use of traditional energy resources (see Figure 2).

Fig.2 Investments in renewable energy in developed and developing countries for November 2022, billion US dollars, according to the IEA

 

Based on the diagrams presented in Fig.2, it can be concluded that the share of investments in "clean" energy in developed countries, even in relative terms, is 4 times ahead of developing countries, some of which are now approaching the stage of industrial take-off, which means increased demand for energy.  Most of these countries are trying to solve the problem of energy shortages by increasing the production of available fossil fuels. Probably, based on this trend, the same IEA predicts that with a decrease in the share in total production, the absolute volumes of use of hydrocarbon energy sources such as gas, oil and coal for the period up to 2030 will only increase. In particular, the agency predicts the peak of oil consumption in absolute values in 2030.

Conclusions and suggestions

In general, [6] taking into account the ongoing energy transition, various, including major, technological breakthroughs are expected in the energy sector in the next 30 years, but a new technological revolution is unlikely. Indirectly, this may be indicated by the direction of scientific research in the field of electric power, where the main developments are conducted in the field of photovoltatics, increasing the efficiency of wind turbines (wind power plants), and not searching for fundamentally new principles of energy production. The directions of a number of technological breakthroughs have already been laid down, these are the development and improvement of technologies for the use of renewable energy, coal gasification, the development of unconventional oil and gas resources, the development of new types of motor fuels - biofuels, compressed and liquefied methane in transport, the development of gas hydrates, the production of hydrogen fuel, etc. This vector of development, aimed, in addition to reducing the environmental burden, at expanding the resource base, will be able to shift the peaks of production of hydrocarbon energy resources for a long period and, in parallel, slow down the increase in cost and reduce the volatility of energy prices.

It is probably worth noting that the next decade for the world energy sector will be marked by the pluralism of energy sources and the multi-vector development of technologies that ensure both reducing the environmental impact of traditional sources (including hydrocarbons), and increasing efficiency and reducing the cost of energy received from renewable energy sources.

By energy pluralism and multi-vector nature, we understand that in the coming years the world energy system will grope for ways of further sustainable development, using both fossil and renewable energy sources. In different regions of the world, this process will occur in different ways, often revealing contradictory combinations, such as the development of wind energy in China, while maintaining colossal volumes of coal production, or the development of technologies for the extraction of unconventional oil and gas resources in the United States in combination with the growing share of solar and wind energy.

 In this situation, it is very important for Russia not to remain among the technological outsiders in the field of efficiency of the use of REI. It is required to establish a separate state program for the development, testing and implementation of energy generating capacities using renewable energy sources adapted to the climatic conditions of the country (peculiarities of insolation, wind speed), work on improving their efficiency (increasing the CIUM (coefficient of utilization of installation capacity) and reducing the cost of kWh of generated energy. The Russian Federation has sufficient potential for the development of any of the areas. Moreover, it is Russia that can pass the stage of the fourth energy transition in a balanced and gradual manner: on the one hand, without hitting the extremes of the "green agenda", and on the other hand, without repeating the mantra of the economic lack of alternative to traditional energy sources.  The combination of the task of providing the state's economy with cheap energy should be complemented by new technological breakthroughs that will allow the country to play a significant role in the global energy sector, even in the event of a global change in the technical and economic structure.

References
1. Grübler, A. (1991). «Diffusion: Long-term patterns and discontinuities». Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 39 (1–2): 159-180.
2. Carter, J. (1977) Address to the Nation on Energy. Retrieved from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-nation-energy
3. Basosi, D «The world’s energy past, present and future at the 1981 United Nations Conference on New and Renewable Sources of Energy», https://energyhistory.eu/en/special-issue/lost-transition-worlds-energy-past-present-and-future-1981-united-nations-conference
4. EnergyTechnologyPerspectives 2012. IEA. Paris. 2012.
5. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/64c27e00-c6cb-48f1-a8f0-082054e3ece6/Renewables2022.pdf
6. «Ýâîëþöèÿ ìèðîâûõ ýíåðãåòè÷åñêèõ ðûíêîâ è åå ïîñëåäñòâèÿ äëÿ Ðîññèè» [The evolution of world energy markets]. (2015). Edited by Makarov À.À., Grigoryev L M, Ìitrov T. A.: INEI RAN, Moscow.
7. World Energy Outlook: report by International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/4ed140c1-c3f3-4fd9-acae-789a4e14a23c/WorldEnergyOutlook2021.pdf
8. Ïðîãíîç ðàçâèòèÿ ýíåðãåòèêè ìèðà è Ðîññèè. 2019: Ñòàòèñòè÷åñêèé ñáîðíèê  [The forecast of energy development in Russia and the world. Statistical review]. (2019). Edited by Makarov À.À.  Grigoryev L M, Ìitrov T. A.  Kylagin V.A.: INEI RAN, Moscow.
9. McKinsey (2022). Energy Insights Global Energy Perspective 2022. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Oil%20and%20Gas/Our%20Insights/Global%20Energy%20Perspective%202022/Global-Energy-Perspective-2022-Executive-Summary.pd

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the political aspects of the process, called the "fourth energy transition", which we have witnessed in recent years. The author rightly connects the relevance of his chosen topic with the problems of Russia's energy security, which, in the context of the transformation of world energy, acquire existential importance. Unfortunately, the author did not bother to reflect at least minimally on the theoretical and methodological basis of his own research. This could not but affect the quality of the study itself and the results obtained. From the context, it can be understood that in addition to traditional general scientific analytical methods, historical and institutional approaches were used, as well as some elements of content analysis of regulatory documents and analysis of secondary statistical data. But in the absence of a description of the goals and objectives of the research, as well as a theoretical and methodological basis, it is completely unclear what scientific results the author planned to obtain. It is for this reason that he did not receive them: there are several points in the text that attract attention (like an analysis of the contradictions of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement), but in general the author's conclusions are either banal (like a "statement" (that's right!) that "the next decade for global energy will be under a sign of pluralism of energy sources"), or are unsubstantiated (like the assumption of a low probability of a new technological revolution in the next 30 years). Some of the results obtained by the author could claim scientific novelty (such as the conclusion that "Russia can pass the stage of the fourth energy transition in a balanced and gradual manner"), but in the absence of a theoretical and methodological basis, it is impossible to recognize them as such. The structure of the reviewed work is also quite chaotic: at the beginning, the author poses a problem and justifies its relevance, after that he defines the term "energy transition", and also reveals the generally accepted classification of such transitions. After that, the causes and features of the "fourth energy transition" are analyzed, as well as its problems and contradictions. But the article itself (based on its title) is not devoted to the "fourth energy transition", but to those problems of technological and energy sovereignty of Russia that are associated with this transition. Accordingly, the structure of the article should be devoted to the disclosure of these problems. Not in the margins, in passing, with the words "Russia's unique role should be noted separately," but directly to these problems. If the author had carried out theoretical and methodological work, such comments would not have arisen. The style of the article, in general, can be described as scientific – the author uses scientific terminology quite skillfully and seeks to argue his conclusions. However, in the text found an unacceptably high number of grammatical (since the title of the article, which allowed a gross error – the word "sovereignty" written by "and"; the text is replete with unnecessary commas, as in the sentence: "the Energy transition is to determine how the change of state..."; another example of unnecessary comma: "The 2000-2010 became apparent, global climate change"; to the contrary, no commas where they should be, involved in the turnover after the defined words: "...Three global structural changes in the global energy caused changes in industrial and social structure..."; the same errors with the verbal participle phrases: "Building forecasts for the next three decades of energy ready..."; or the usual typos, as in the sentence: "...Over the past 250 years people in the world happened..."; meet and inconsistent sentences: "...Only in the second decade of the twenty-first century technology has allowed..." or "...the Global energy crisis interrupted the beginning, it was the growth rate of global energy consumption..."; etc.) and actual (e.g., the expression "since the industrial revolution" is not true, as the phenomenon is called "industrial revolution" was not instantaneous and lasted at least two centuries; another example: the author contrasts the "system based on the energy of burning biomass (wood, straw, peat)" "industrial system characterized... coal"; but coal is also in the past – organic material, so the juxtaposition of his "biomass burning", the more the peat from which coal is formed and, by mistake; etc.) The bibliography consists of 9 items, including sources in foreign languages, and includes mainly the analysis and forecasts, not a scientific work. There are also errors in the design of the bibliographic list that need to be eliminated (for example, the source of J. Carter's appeal in 1977 is not indicated). There is no appeal to opponents due to the lack of theoretical elaboration of the article. GENERAL CONCLUSION: the article proposed for review cannot be qualified as a completed scientific work that meets all the criteria of scientific publications. It lacks a theoretical and methodological basis, as well as the scientific novelty of the results obtained. The structure of the work does not reflect the main aspects of the conducted research. The text contains an unacceptably large number of grammatical errors. The bibliographic list does not reflect the state of research on the subject of the article. Nevertheless, the presented material corresponds to the subject of the journal "Politics and Society", and the results obtained by the author may be of interest to political scientists, sociologists, specialists in public administration, world politics and international relations, as well as students of the listed specialties. After finalizing the article and eliminating these comments, it can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study. Based on the title, the article should be devoted to Russia's technological and energy sovereignty in the context of the Fourth Energy Transition in the global energy sector. The content of the reviewed materials thematically corresponds to the selected title, but the depth of immersion in these issues is superficial. You should also remove the dot in the header. The research methodology is based on the presentation of well-known facts and judgments. Also, on the one hand, the presence of graphic objects should be noted in a positive way, and, on the other hand, the absence of their analysis in the text (the comments present retell the content of the graphs, but do not allow any logical connections to be established). When finalizing the article, it is necessary to leave these graphical objects, but to enhance the quality of their analysis, including taking into account relative data, and not only absolute values of indicators. The relevance of the study of issues related to the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation is extremely high. At the same time, the demand for officials of state authorities of the Russian Federation, subjects of the Russian Federation, local governments, expert and scientific communities exists precisely for qualitative research that allows substantiating proposals to ensure the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the shortest possible time, since this is the key to national security of the state. There is no scientific novelty in the materials submitted for review, although the data present should encourage the author of the article to formulate and substantiate interesting patterns, conclusions and proposals. Style, structure, content. The style of presentation is scientific. The structure of the article has not been built by the author. When finalizing the article, it is recommended to highlight the blocks "introduction", "materials and methods", "research results", "discussion of research results", "conclusions and suggestions", "directions for further research". The content of the article contains a fairly large number of theses that are not accompanied by any arguments. For example, the author argues that "a new technological revolution is unlikely." What is the basis of this statement? It would also be interesting to learn more about what the author understands by "pluralism of energy sources and multi-vector directions of technology development": what does this mean, what does it include? Bibliography. The author has compiled a bibliographic list consisting of 9 sources, of which, most likely (due to the carelessness of the design, it is extremely difficult to determine the type of publication), 5 belong to scientific publications (of which 3 were published in 1977, 1981, 1991). When finalizing the article, it is necessary, first, to expand the list of sources under consideration (by making the key focus is on those released in 2022-2023), and, secondly, to execute their design in strict accordance with the requirements of GOST. Appeal to opponents. Despite the existence of a well-formed list of references, no scientific discussion has been carried out with the results of research received by other authors. When finalizing the article, it should be shown what is the increase in scientific knowledge? Conclusions, the interest of the readership. Taking into account all of the above, the article requires serious refinement in structure, content and design, provided it is implemented, it will be in high demand by the readership due to the increased attention of senior officials of the Russian Federation and subjects of the Russian Federation to substantiate solutions to existing problems of ensuring the technological sovereignty of our state.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "The fourth energy transition in the world energy sector: technological and energy sovereignty of Russia The subject of the study is indicated in the title and explained in the text of the article. The methodology of the article. The article is based on traditional general scientific analytical methods of work. In addition, the work uses a "historical and institutional approach" and "elements of content analysis of regulatory documents and secondary statistical data". The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that, according to scientific forecasts, the fourth energy transition in the world energy industry and the wider use of renewable energy sources (RES) will occur in the XXI century: solar energy, water energy (energy from rivers and geothermal underground sources), rain energy (rain) energy obtained from the processing of biomass and waste, energy released by waste to landfills, tidal energy, etc. The climate changes observed in recent decades by environmentalists, public figures and some politicians are considered "a consequence of anthropogenic impact, expressed in a significant increase in the use of carbon-containing energy resources. The rapidly growing emission of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide and methane) on a global scale is becoming critical, at the same time, the uneven distribution of traditional energy resources poses a potential threat to the energy security of developed countries." The issue of the need to reduce the use of carbon-containing energy resources and the transition to carbon-free energy was adopted in 2015 at the Paris Conference and Russia supported this decision. Russia has large reserves of energy resources (carbonaceous) and the author of the reviewed article notes that "for the last half century, energy carriers have been the main item of Russian exports, the main source of foreign exchange earnings, and the branch of specialization of the state in the international division of labor." The global transformation of the global energy system affects Russia's strategic interests. Despite the fact that Russia is provided with energy resources (carbon) and also has renewable energy (to a certain extent), nevertheless, Russia must take into account that the world is moving towards the fourth energy transition and use its strengths and reduce possible risks. The relevance of the topic is beyond doubt. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the formulation of the problem and the objectives of the study. Style, structure, content. The style of the article is scientific, the language is clear and precise. The structure of the work consists of the following sections: introduction, research goals and methods, research results, conclusions and suggestions, bibliography. In the introduction, the author gives a succinct and clear description of the term energy transfer and explains its essence. The research methods section reveals the relevance of the research, the goals and objectives of the research, explains the methodology and methods of work. The research results section presents the history of the origin of the term energy transfer, what meaning was put into it at different times, and also gives a description of the three previous and modern fourth energy transfer. There are many interesting facts in this section, and a detailed and professional analysis of the current situation in the international energy sector is given. It also describes the Russian energy sector and notes that "the energy security of the Russian economy is the key not only to the country's competitiveness in the world markets of energy-intensive products, but also to social stability, defense capability and the very existence of the state, the livelihood of its population in an extremely cold (compared with the vast majority of countries) climate." The author considers the technology sector to be a weak point in the energy sector and writes that in Russia "energy based on the use of renewable energy (with the exception of hydro) is characterized by low efficiency and high cost" and, as a result, low investment attractiveness." He notes that in the future, with the successful mass passage of the fourth energy transition, our country will have to "solve the problem of changing the structure of exports and be ready for possible peace agreements that discriminate against both hydrocarbon energy and industrial products produced with its participation." The conclusions of the authors of the article(s) are objective and follow from the work done. In order to maintain its position and not remain "among the technological outsiders in the field of efficiency of the use of REI," according to the author of the article, in Russia "it is necessary to establish a separate state program for the development, testing and implementation of energy generating capacities using renewable energy adapted to the climatic conditions of the country (peculiarities of insolation, wind speed), work on improving The main conclusion of the authors of the article is that "it is Russia that can pass the stage of the fourth energy transition in a balanced and gradual manner: on the one hand, without hitting the extremes of the "green agenda", and on the other hand, without repeating the mantra of the economic lack of alternative to traditional energy sources. The combination of the task of providing the state's economy with cheap energy should be complemented by new technological breakthroughs that will allow the country to play a significant role in the field of global energy, even in the event of a global change in the technical and economic structure." The article is provided with graphs, which makes the work visually more intelligible and understandable for the reader. The text of the article is logical and consistent, aimed at achieving the set goals and objectives of the study. The bibliography of the work consists of 9 different sources (statistical, regulatory documents, monographs, articles on the topic of the study) in Russian, English and French. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the work collected during the study. A bibliography can provide an answer to opponents' questions. The article is written on an actual scientific topic and will be of interest to the readers of the journal. The article must be subtracted, because there are typos and typos in it.