Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Sacralization of the value structures of human existence in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai

Popov Evgeniy Aleksandrovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor of the Department of Sociology and Conflictology of Altai State University; Professor of the Department of History and Philosophy of the Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

656038, Russia, Barnaul, 66 Dimitrova str., room 513

popov.eug@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2023.5.40874

EDN:

BPKXVZ

Received:

30-05-2023


Published:

06-06-2023


Abstract: The article characterizes the substantial level of sacralization of values in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai. The main emphasis is placed on identifying the grounds for the sacralization of values. It is established that the world order is one of the bases of sacralization and simultaneously performs the function of consolidating cultural carriers. The key thesis of the research is the thesis that spiritual culture cannot be fully comprehended without reference to sacred values. In addition, the sacralization of values is considered as a condition for ensuring spiritual security and continuity of values and norms between generations of cultural carriers. The assessment of the spiritual potential of the culture of the Greater Altai is of great importance. The main conclusions of the study are the following provisions: 1) the sacralization of key values is carried out at the essential or substantial level, while the stages of sacralization are mainly "tied" to the religious and mythological development of culture and its value-normative system; 2) sacralization encompasses those value structures that acquire importance in human existence and are a factor in the integration of cultural carriers and their generations; 3 sacralization is the process of identifying specific value-semantic structures – they are attributed symbolic meaning, and they are also correlated with certain cultural codes, signs and texts.


Keywords:

values, culture, civilization, transformation of values, Big Altai, civilizational development, value system, the system of norms, civilizational approach, spiritual culture

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

  The article was prepared within the framework of the state assignment of the Altai State University "The Turkic World of the Greater Altai": unity and diversity in history and modernity" (project number - 748715F.99.1. BB97AA00002) and REC of Altaic studies and Turkology "Big Altai".

 

One of the basic elements of any traditional culture remains the sacralization of values; in philosophical, cultural and interdisciplinary scientific research, the thesis is often predominant that understanding the features of traditional culture, rethinking its key properties is possible mainly in the aspect of identifying the sacred (sacred). This point of view, for example, is shared by J. Bataille and K. Peno [1], R. Otto [2], M. Eliade [3] and others. Indeed, if we are talking about spiritual culture, which also has a pronounced ethno-regional flavor, then the sacralization of values in the space of such culture contributes not only to the preservation of sacred meanings of being, their transfer from one generation of cultural carriers to another, but also, in fact, provides spiritual security to an ethnic group or people. From this point of view, through the sacralization of values, it is possible to trace the historical path of culture, the formation of its cultural-historical type (according to N.Y. Danilevsky [4]), to identify the specifics of the value-normative system of culture and the main features of its socio-cultural dynamics. At the same time, the reception of sacred values should take into account the interpretation of culture as a value-semantic system that forms the key meanings of human individual and collective existence and determines their conjugation with the fundamental values of traditional culture.

         The sacralization of values in this work is understood as a mechanism for designating sacred meanings of being in the phenomena of everyday life of cultural carriers and their generations, as well as the endowment of attributes of everyday life, states of nature, cosmos, world order with divine properties, symbols and codes. In this case, such a definition follows from a generalization that can be made based on the positions of some researchers of sacredness [5-9]. It is also worth emphasizing that, for example, cultural codes most often become the subject of consideration in cultural studies, since they are the "final" forms of value-semantic transformations and therefore can be objectified in one way or another in numerous traditional or archaic rituals, rituals and ceremonies. In this regard, the decoding of cultural codes provides quite convincing information about the identity of culture as a whole, about the features of its value-normative system. Another thing is that there are often questions about the mechanisms of decoding such cultural codes: in this case, an adequate choice of the appropriate methodology of analysis is important.

         The spiritual culture of the Greater Altai is a single sacred space of culture; with all the contradictions of the socio-political and socio-economic fate of the Greater Altai, polyethnicity and polyregionalism, the space of its culture remained more "stable", accumulating invaluable generational experience in the transfer of social experience and key sacred values. It seems that on the material of the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai and, above all, religion and mythology, it is possible to trace the path of the sacralisation of values; an important point will be the confirmation of the hypothesis that the sacralisation of values supports cultural traditionalism and provides a single sacred space of culture in which the spread of common sacred values, including the most important consolidating function and also contributing to the spiritual security of the ethnic group. Thus, we can talk about the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai as a monolithic phenomenon based, among other things, on sacred values.

         Sacred values can be defined as the significance for cultural bearers of sacred meanings of the divine and substantial, which determine the daily life of individuals and societies, and are also the basis for the formation and development of a religious and mythological worldview and correlate with the ontological system Creator - Man – World. With such identification of sacred values, the degree of their possible objectification increases, when they are perceived not only as abstract models or meanings of being, but also completely "fit" into the everyday existence of cultural carriers or their generations, i.e. in this case they can also receive attributive characteristics, for example, a sacred stone, a sacred mountain, sacred water etc. On the other hand, other types of sacred values are common in religion and mythology, which have substantial properties and cannot be subject to any attribution. Nevertheless, their significance for culture and its bearers is immutable and decisive for the genesis of the value-normative system.

         The substantial level of sacralization of values in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai, on the one hand, has no fundamental differences depending on the area of development of culture, its regionalism – it is obvious that substantialization is characteristic of human culture as a whole, on the other hand, the specificity of the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai allows us to identify some nuances of the sacralization of values. The key "ontos" of the culture of the Greater Altai is the world order; the search of generations of culture bearers was associated with the power personifying the path to the Creator, overcoming obstacles and conflicts, finding harmony with the World and oneself, etc. The world order as the basis for the substantialization of values is not characteristic of all traditional cultures – mainly, as some foreign authors note, culture acts as "the unconscious flip side of civilized life, beliefs and preferences taken for granted, which we must be vaguely aware of in order to be able to act" [10, p. 44].

It is the civilizational factor that often determines the levels of sacralization of values and determines most of the processes of socio-cultural dynamics. The world order can also become the basis of the civilizational level of sacralization of values, but only in those cultures that are placed under the condition of survival, loss of their identity, etc.; for such cultures, the world order appears as a mechanism for ordering value systems, therefore, in such cultures, sacred values are mainly associated with specific natural phenomena – rivers, lakes, forests, the sky, earth. The world order as the basis of the substantial level of the sacralization of values demonstrates a state of culture in which these values are correlated with the vital force, spiritual force, sacred force, it ultimately must correlate with the senses of perception of the motherland, native home, native place, but in any case, in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai, the world order is part of the human path to the Creator and the world. Why is this level of sacralization characteristic of such an ethno-regional culture as the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai? The fact is that the contamination of values and norms that occurred in the space of this culture naturally had to find its orderliness – but this could only happen in two directions: civilizational and substantial; since the civilizational factor had a greater impact on the contamination processes of the cultural and civilizational development of the Greater Altai, the substantial factor (or the level of sacralization) became determining for further "ontologization" of ethno-regional culture. Moreover, as the researchers put it, "in fact, Altai can become the core and symbol of the spiritual-ecological (or noospheric) commonwealth of the countries of Greater Eurasia, peacemaking and unifying in its very essence" [11, p. 11]. Without delving into this problem, we emphasize that sacred values at the substantial level are associated with such meanings of being that have a consolidating meaning not according to the principle of ideology, politics, economics, but in accordance with the foundations of spirituality, moral and moral principle.  

Regarding the "unity" of sacred values that support the cultural traditionalism of the Greater Altai, performing the most important consolidating function, contributing to the spiritual security of the ethnic group, in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai, all these characteristics are confirmed: the world order is the brightest sign of traditional culture, in it values and norms are so ordered that they balance all spheres of being – ideological, political, philosophical, religious and ideological, etc. In addition, the world order at the substantial level reinforces the essential properties of spiritual security: the search for the beginning of the world of its ultimate, the acquisition of destiny, the sacred source of life and other sacred values of the substantial level contribute to the state of spiritual security.

Thus, the substantial level of sacralisation of values in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai makes it possible to determine the fundamental essential qualities of ethno-regional culture, to preserve its traditionalism and continuity of the value-normative system for future generations.         

References
1. Bataille J., Peignot K. (2004). Sacred. Tver: Kolonna Publications.
2. Otto R. (2008). Sacred. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University.
3. Eliade M. (1994). Sacred and mundane. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University.
4. Danilevsky N.Ya. (2008). Russia and Europe. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilization.
5. Zherdeva A.S. (2008). Comprehension of the concept of "sacred" in modern philosophical discourse. Scientific notes of V.I. Vernadsky Tauride National University. The series "Philosophy. Sociology", 1. Vol. 21. pp. 437-444.
6. Kayua R. (2003). Myth and man. Man and the sacred. Moscow: United Humanitarian Publishing House.
7. Moss M. (2000). Social functions of the sacred: Selected works. I.V. Utekhin (Ed.). St. Petersburg: Eurasia.
8. Rostova N.N. (2016). Sacred as a concept. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy, 3(21), 112-120.
9. Sheler M. (1988). The position of man in space. In: The problem of man in Western philosophy (pp. 31-95). Moscow: Progress.
10. Eagleton T. (2019). The Idea of culture. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.
11. Ivanov A.V., Shishin M.Yu. Altai as a region of peacemaking: historical experience and modern role. Retrieved from http://rectors.altstu.ru/ru/periodical/archiv/2020/1/articles/1_1.pdf

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study is indicated in the title ("Sacralization of the value structures of human existence in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai") and is defined by the author as one of the basic elements of any traditional culture, as well as as a "mechanism for designating sacred meanings of existence in the phenomena of everyday life of cultural bearers and their generations, ... endowing attributes of everyday life, states of nature, the cosmos, the world order by divine properties, symbols and codes." It should be noted that the author expresses himself excessively ornately (difficult), sometimes hiding behind scientifically complex statements overloaded with special terminology, significant logical errors: false judgments, tautologies and banal judgments. Accordingly, the formal and logical reduction makes it possible to uncover a pile of absurdities, which, given that budget money has been allocated for the study, borders on profanity - a sophisticated way of stealing budget funds, which may be followed by inadequate political decisions that can harm the cultural identity of the Greater Altai. Let's look at some examples of the author's logical errors. Already in the definition of the subject, the author points out that the sacralization of the value structures of human existence is: (1) a systemic element of exclusively traditional culture — this thesis is refuted by the historical example of Soviet culture, which is difficult to consider traditional, but which possessed the most powerful tool for the sacralization of social democratic values and desacralization of traditional value structures of human existence - the state ideological doctrine of building a bright therefore, the first thesis is false; (2) the mechanism of designation of sacred meanings of being in the phenomena of everyday life of cultural bearers and their generations, i.e. the author replaces the process of designation (essentially the process of complexly organized collective activity) with a mechanism — some impersonal abstract entity or system dictating to cultural bearers and their generations the sacred meanings of being, thereby postulating the inability of the peoples of the Greater Altai to preserve the values of their traditional culture through collective volitional efforts, i.e. the author forbids an individual to be a representative of his autochthonous traditional culture of his own free will or does not recognize his ability to do so (free will); then let me ask: what drives such a mechanism? — the answer to this rhetorical question indicates that the second thesis turns out to be false; (3) the endowment of attributes of everyday life, states of nature, cosmos, world order with divine properties, symbols and codes; endowment is also a process, and if we recognize that only people live daily lives, then the third thesis clearly contradicts the second. Thus, the author gives a false and contradictory definition of the subject of research. He does not explain his position to the reader, but confuses, and there is a possibility that he does it intentionally. As an example of an explicit tautology, the third paragraph (123 words) can be cited: the author unreasonably claims that "the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai is a single sacred space of culture," followed by several arguments following from the primary thesis, from which, in turn, it follows that "it is possible to talk about the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai as a monolithic phenomenon based, among other things, on sacred values", i.e., the rhetorical method of substitution of synonymous concepts (unity = monolith), known since the time of the struggle of the Socratics with the sophists, was used. It is not clear who the author is trying to mislead. In conclusion, the author comes to a seemingly non-trivial and politically valuable conclusion ("the substantial level of sacralization of values in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai allows us to determine the fundamental essential qualities of ethnoregional culture, preserve its traditionalism and continuity of the value-normative system for subsequent generations"). However, it follows from the statement that "the substantial level of sacralization of values in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai ... has no fundamental differences ... – it is obvious that substantialization is characteristic of human culture as a whole." In other words, the author repeats a well-known banality, to which he has already appealed. Therefore, we have to admit that the subject of the study was defined falsely and inconsistently by the author, and his "research" did not lead to a unique result, i.e. the subject of the study was not disclosed in the article. The research methodology, as noted above, has not developed into a verifiable system. The rhetorical techniques used by the author do not clarify the essence of the issue, but on the contrary complicate the idea of the uniqueness of the traditional cultures of the peoples of the Greater Altai. The relevance of the topic raised by the author, given the reliance of the state national and cultural policy on the traditional values of the peoples of the Russian Federation, is extremely high. However, the author should significantly rework the material presented by him so that it does not look like an attempt to speculate on relevant topics and profanation of scientific and philosophical creativity. The scientific novelty remains controversial, although the substantial approach to characterizing the traditional culture of the peoples of the Greater Altai seems promising. The style of the presented material, judging by the results of the formal logical reduction of individual judgments, is more scientific than scientific. The author needs to work on simplifying statements in order to independently clear the article of low-content elements and present his thought logically and clearly enough. The structure of the article also needs to be improved: it would be appropriate to set out a clear research program in the introduction and give clear definitions of the basic categories. Then, perhaps, the conclusion will take the form of a logical consequence of the considered and justified fundamental issues. In addition, literary proofreading of the text is also necessary (there are typos: for example, "... as discussed by researchers ..."). The bibliography reveals the subject area of the study to some extent, however, given the severity of the topic raised by the author, it looks meager (few publications over the past 5 years, no literature containing empirical grounds for philosophical generalizations: anthropological, ethnographic, etc.). An appeal to opponents, given the many logical errors, may be considered incorrect. It is not at all clear where the author relies on the opinions of colleagues, and where he expresses his own original judgments. The reviewed article, of course, may be of interest to the readership of the journal "Philosophy and Culture" in the future. But serious revision of the presented material is required.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author presented his article "Sacralization of the value structures of human existence in the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai" to the journal "Philosophy and Culture", in which a study of the mechanisms of formation and consolidation of the values of traditional culture in the consciousness of society was conducted. The author proceeds in the study of this issue from the fact that the sacralization of values is one of the basic elements of any traditional culture, since understanding the features of traditional culture, rethinking its key properties is possible mainly in the aspect of identifying the sacred. The sacralization of values in the space of such a culture contributes not only to the preservation of sacred meanings of existence, their transfer from one generation of cultural bearers to another, but also, according to the author, provides spiritual security to an ethnic group or people. The perception and comprehension of sacred values should take into account the interpretation of culture as a value-semantic system that forms the key meanings of human individual and collective existence and determines their conjugation with the fundamental values of traditional culture. The article was prepared within the framework of the state assignment of the Altai State University "The Turkic world of the Greater Altai": unity and diversity in history and modernity" (project number – 748715F.99.1. BB97AA00002) and the REC of Altaic studies and Turkology "Big Altai". The relevance of the study is due to the fact that in the context of globalization, with the constant blurring of borders between ethnic groups and entire nations, there is a risk of creating a unified appearance of the planet. The preservation of cultural diversity is one of the important strategic goals, without which it is impossible to talk about the development of all mankind and universal human progress. The methodological base is an integrated approach containing general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as philosophical and socio-cultural analysis. The theoretical basis of the research was the works of such famous scientists as N.Y. Danilevsky, M. Eliade, J. Bataille and others. The purpose of the study is to study the mechanism of sacralizing the values of traditional culture. The subject of the study is the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai. The author explains the choice of the subject of the study by the fact that the Greater Altai is a single multiethnic and multi-regional stable sacred cultural space, in which invaluable generational experience in the transmission of traditional sacred values has been accumulated. The author believes that based on the material of the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai and, above all, religion and mythology, it is possible to trace the path of the sacralization of values. The author hypothesizes that the sacralization of values supports cultural traditionalism and provides a single sacred cultural space in which common sacred values are distributed, which perform, among other things, an important consolidating function and, moreover, contribute to ensuring the spiritual security of an ethnic group. The author defines the phenomenon of sacralization of values as a mechanism for designating sacred meanings of existence in the phenomena of everyday life of cultural bearers and their generations, as well as endowing attributes of everyday life, states of nature, cosmos, world order with divine properties, symbols and codes. Sacred values are the basis for the formation and development of a religious and mythological worldview and a value-normative system of both an individual and entire communities. The author identifies the divine and substantial levels of the sacralization of values. From his point of view, the substantial level most vividly demonstrates the mechanisms of socio-cultural dynamics, since sacred values at the substantial level are associated with such meanings of being that have a consolidating meaning not according to the principle of ideology, politics, economics, but in accordance with the foundations of spirituality, moral principle.. Using the example of the analysis of the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai, the author concludes that substantialization is characteristic of human culture as a whole, however, the spiritual culture of the Greater Altai has certain nuances of the sacralization of values. Thus, the existential basis of the culture of the Greater Altai is the world order: the search of generations of cultural bearers was associated with the power personifying the path to the Creator, overcoming obstacles and conflicts, finding harmony with the World and oneself. The world order at the substantial level reinforces the essential properties of spiritual security: the search for the beginning of the world of its ultimate, the acquisition of destiny, the sacred source of life and other sacred values of the substantial level contribute to the state of spiritual security. The author pays attention to the study of the civilizational factor in the mechanism of sacralization of values, since this factor determines the levels of sacralization and determines most of the processes of socio-cultural dynamics. In conclusion, the author presents a conclusion on the conducted research, which contains all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the mechanisms of formation of the moral and value system of a certain people is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the study consists of 11 sources, which seems sufficient for the generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the subject under study. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.