Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1942,   Articles in work: 284 Declined articles: 828 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Service labor within the structure of socioeconomic activities of Russians
Vodenko Konstantin Viktorovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Management of Social and Economic Systems, Platov South Russian State Polytechnic University

346428, Russia, Rostov Oblast, Novocherkassk, Prosvesheniya Street 132

vodenkok@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Ivanchenko Ol'ga Sergeevna

PhD in Sociology

Docent, the department of Management of Social and Economic Systems, Platov South Russian State Polytechnic University

346428, Russia, Rostov Oblast, Novocherkassk, Prosvesheniya Street 132

olga.ivanchenko1509@mail.ru

Abstract.

The object of this research is the specificity of socioeconomic activities in Russian society. The subject of this research is the specificity of functionality of service labor in the context of development of the national model of management of socioeconomic activities in the modern Russian society. The goal of the article consists in the examination of peculiarities of the impact of service labor upon the Russian middle class, taking into account its role in development of the national model of management of socioeconomic activities. The authors reviews the cultural and historical aspects of the development of service labor, specificity of the Russian middle class and civil society in relation to the peculiarities of socioeconomic activities of Russians. The main conclusions lies in the idea that the loyalty of representatives of the middle class pertinent to the government vertical and its bureaucratic apparatus is largely substantiated by the established practices of service labor. In this regards, the middle class in general experiences the deficit of sociopolitical subjectivity, while continues to perform an essential function of supporting the social stability. It is noted that the service labor can contradict the value orientation with the middle class representatives, who wants to exercise their initiative and realize the professional functions in the conditions of market relations. Thus, the impact of service labor encourages the formation of such model of socioeconomic development of the Russian civil society, in which the value orientations of the middle class are focuses on the coexistence with government structures, rather than the struggle.  At the same time, the key vector of development of the national model of management of the socioeconomic activities suggests the growth of subjectivity of the middle class and civil control due to the increase of the overall level of transparency. Because the functionality of service labor in Russian society in many ways is justified by the peculiarities of basic institutional matrix (X-matrix), its effect will continue to remain, especially for the social classes involved in civil service. In separate segments of the middle class, primarily in the groups of creative class, we can observe the trend towards the rejection of service labor that is associated with the lesser economic dependency and game rules dictated by the communal environment of the Russian society. Therefore, the further prospects of development of the national model of socioeconomic activities center around the complementary integration of the institutional practices common to the maker and redistributive social systems.  The development socioeconomic activities and enhancement of the scientific innovative activity, necessitates focusing on the development of special institutional formations that establish favorable environment for realization of the creative abilities of representatives of the middle (creative) class.

Keywords: state, culture, redistributive economy, management, socioeconomic activities, national model, civil society, institutional matrices, Russian middle class, service labor

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0730.2017.4.24285

Article was received:

28-09-2017


Review date:

30-09-2017


Publish date:

02-11-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Aleksander Dzh. Smysly sotsial'noi zhizni: kul'tursotsiologiya. M.: Praksis. 2013. 640 s.
2.
Bessonova O.E. Razdatok: institutsional'naya teoriya khozyaistvennogo razvitiya Rossii. Novosibirsk: IEiOPP SO RAN. 1999. 152 s.
3.
Veber M. Izbrannoe: Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. M.; SPb: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; Universitetskaya kniga. 2014. 656 s.
4.
Vodenko K.V. Kul'turno-mirovozzrencheskie aspekty vzaimosvyazi vlasti, sobstvennosti i upravleniya v rossiiskom obshchestve // Sotsiodinamika. 2017. № 4. S.59-67.
5.
Gorshkov M.K. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo kak ono est' (opyt sotsiologicheskoi diagnostiki): v 2 t. T.2. M.: Novyi khronograf. 2016. 496 s.
6.
Gorshkov M.K., Tikhonova N.E. Sotsiokul'turnye faktory konsolidatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN. 2013. 54 s.
7.
Kagarlitskii B.Yu. Vosstanie srednego klassa. M.: Algoritm, Eksmo. 2012. 224 s.
8.
Kirdina S.G. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: ukhod ot ideologemy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. S. 63–73.
9.
Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii: vvedenie v X-Y-teoriyu. M.; SPb: Nestor-Istoriya, 2014. 468 s.
10.
Nort D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki. M.: Fond ekonomicheskoi knigi «Nachala». 1997. 180 s.
11.
Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. Rossiya i Evropa: effekt kolei (opyt institutsional'nogo analiza istorii ekonomicheskogo razvitiya). Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta. 2010. 530 s.
12.
Parsons T. O strukture sotsial'nogo deistviya. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt. 2002. 880 s.
13.
Smirnov P.I. Etapy obshchestvennogo razvitiya kak ideal'nye tipy // Vestnik SPbGU. 1998. Ser. 6. Vyp. 3. S. 45-52.
14.
Srednii klass v sovremennoi Rossii. Opyt mnogoletnikh issledovanii / Pod red. M.K.Gorshkova i N.E. Tikhonovoi. M.: Ves' Mir. 2016. 368 s.
15.
Tikhonov A.V. Ob institutsionalizatsii upravleniya v sovremennoi Rossii // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2010. № 1(37). S. 59–75.
16.
Tikhonov A.V. Sotsiologiya upravleniya. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya». 2007. 472 s.
17.
Toshchenko Zh.T. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo kak ob''ekt sotsiologii zhizni // Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii. 2016. № 5. S. 50–62.
18.
Sheregi F.E. Obrazovanie kak sotsial'nyi institut // Grani rossiiskogo obrazovaniya. M.: Tsentr sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii. 2015. 644 s