Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2151,   Articles in work: 283 Declined articles: 928 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Transformation of public sphere in theory and practice of public administration
Kosorukov Artem Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Senior Lecturer, Chair of Political Analysis, Lomonosov Moscow State University

119992, Russia, g. Moscow, Lomonosovskii prospekt, 27k4, aud. A814

kosorukovmsu@mail.ru
Abstract. The subject of this research is the public sphere in theory and practice of public administration from the era of Medieval Times until the present stage. Differentiation of public sphere is viewed based on the evolution of the institution of monarchy within the process of bourgeois-democratic transformations in Europe and the United States, transition from the concept of feudal-estate representation of authority towards the bourgeois-democratic concept, development of religious freedom, and separation church and state. The analysis of classical liberal model of public sphere, as well as public sphere under the circumstances of establishment of the welfare state in the XX century allows revealing the role and meaning of mass media in advancement of publicity of the social and state actors. Methodology of this work includes the application of historical and logical methods, which based on studying of the theory and practice of public administration, are able to trace the establishment of public sphere and mark its key elements and interrelation between them. The main conclusions of the conducted research lie in the following positions: the public sphere in many aspects depends on the representation of authority in the context of informatization of public administration, as well as development of mass media under the conditions of mass democracy; state authority takes on the role of coordination of public space and public policy; takes place the consolidation of public authority within the network public space; overcoming the “re-feudalization” of public sphere is possible based on the achieving by the state and society of the new political compromises; public actors need to receive constant support from society under the circumstances of crisis of the publicity.
Keywords: Feudal Lord, Middle Ages, Monarch, Mass Media, Public Discussion, Publicity, Public Administration, Public Sphere, Bourgeoisie, Mass Democracy
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.8.20966
Article was received: 04-11-2016

Review date: 05-11-2016

Publish date: 11-09-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Habermas J. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964) // New German Critique, 1974. № 3, P. 49.
2.
Smorgunov L.V. Ponyatie i sfery publichnoi politiki // Gosudarstvennaya politika i upravlenie: Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov / Pod. red. A.I. Solov'eva. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 2017. S. 388.
3.
Solov'ev A.I. Mnogovektornyi kharakter publichnoi politiki: kolliziya normativnosti i povsednevnosti / Upravlenie publichnoi politikoi: Kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. L.V. Smorgunova. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Aspekt Press», 2015. – S. 28.
4.
Kshemenetskaya M.N. Sovremennye mekhanizmy i tekhnologii politicheskoi kommunikatsii v gosudarstvennom upravlenii Rossii / Politika i obshchestvo, 2016. № 4. S. 457-465.
5.
Goode L. Jürgen Habermas: democracy and the public sphere. Pluto Press, 2005. URL: https://uniteyouthdublin.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/ebooksclub-org__jurgen_habermas__democracy_and_the_public_sphere__modern_european_thinkers_.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2016).
6.
Vershinin A.A., Molchakov N.Yu. Problema legitimnosti politicheskoi vlasti v sovremennoi Rossii // Problemnyi analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. 2016, № 1 (45).-S. 23.
7.
Sidorova T.A. Problemy konstitutsionnykh osnov i parlamentarizma v Anglii v britanskoi istoriografii kriticheskogo napravleniya XX veka // Novyi vzglyad. Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi Vestnik. 2013, № 2.
8.
Byukher K. Proiskhozhdenie gazety. Rech', chitannaya v professorskom fereine, v Leiptsige, 3 dekabrya 1892g. / Perevod s nemetskogo V. Chumikova. SPb. Izdanie I.Yurovskogo. 35 s.-(Mezhdunarodnaya Biblioteka; № 46).-18 kh 13.
9.
Kosorukova A.A. Professional'naya etika zhurnalista: problemy i printsipy // Professional'naya etika v sovremennom obshchestve: Sbornik statei / po obshch. red. V.A. Tsvyka. M.: Ekon-inform, 2011. S. 44-50.
10.
Miroshnichenko I.V. Publichnaya politika kak zontichnaya kontseptsiya politicheskoi nauki // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik. 2014, № 47. S. 357.
11.
Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R., Romanov P.V. Publichnaya sfera: programma issledovaniya / Publichnaya sfera: teoriya, metodologiya, keis stadi: kollektiv. monogr. / pod red. E.R. Yarskoi-Smirnovoi i P.V. Romanova (Biblioteka «Zhurnala issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki»). M.: OOO «Variant»: TsSPGI, 2013. S. 10.
12.
I.N.Trofimova Mestnoe samoupravlenie v sovremennykh kontseptsiyakh publichnogo upravleniya // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 187 - 195. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.2.5022.
13.
Ivan'ko N.A., Torukalo V.P. Model' gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sotsial'noi sfere zhizni sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 806 - 816. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.7439.
14.
Churyaev A.V. K voprosu o sisteme administrativno-pravovykh metodov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 11. - C. 70 - 75.
15.
Savchenko I.A., Ustinova O.E. Aktual'nye problemy internet-kommunikatsii mezhdu organom gosudarstvennogo upravleniya i grazhdanami: sotsiologicheskii analiz // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2016. - 9. - C. 1233 - 1243. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.9.15992.
16.
Alekseev D.B. Kontseptsiya razvitiya gosudarstvennogo kontrolya kak sposoba obespecheniya rezhima zakonnosti v gosudarstvennom upravlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2016. - 5. - C. 410 - 416. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2016.5.17121.
17.
A.S. Emel'yanov Administrativno-pravovaya doktrina, idei liberalizma i razvitie gosudarstvennosti v Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 220 - 225. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.02.13.