Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Pushkarskaya N.V. To the problem of the early categorical thinking in Ancient China

Abstract: This article is dedicated to one of the main issues of philosophy in general and Chinese philosophy in particular – the problem of categories. In the center of the research is the definition of the term “category” and search of the first categorical ideas within the archaic thought of Ancient China. The author also examines of the most valuable texts acquired during the archeological excavations (the end of the XX century) – treatise “Taiyi Shengshui” (“Great One gave birth to water”), which represents an example of the early categorical thinking in China. The methodological orientation consists in focusing attention on primary sources, as well as structural moments in the Ancient Green and Chinese categorical schemes. The process of formation of the categorical thinking is demonstrated in comparison with the similar process of the early Greek philosophers. The author gives a positive answer to the question of “whether or not the categorical thinking exists in the Chinese philosophy?” Among the pre-Socrates philosophers, the fourfold of the initiate elements serves as the first categorical generalizations. The first attempts of categorical perception of the world in the philosophical thought of Ancient China can be considered the basic classification patterns (binary, ternary, quinary) that lie in the foundation of the entire traditional culture and philosophy of China. The text “Taiyi Shengshui” (“Great One gave birth to water”) provides a different perspective onto the cosmological aspects of such imperative classification pattern as quinary, as well as gives chance for a deeper understanding of the analogy between the philosophy of Ancient China and philosophical constructs of the early Greek philosophers (including Thales of Miletus).


Keywords:

Fourfold of Martin Heidegger, Universality, Early Greek philosophers, Philosophy of Ancient China, The five elements, Quinary classification pattern, Thales of Miletus, Fourfold, Categorical thinking, Category


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Lao-tszy, di syshier chzhan 老子, 第四十二章 [Lao-tszy, 42 chzhan]. URL: http://www.daodejing.org/42.html. Data obrashcheniya: 05.10.2015.
2. Khaidegger Martin. Veshch' // Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya. Per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1993. 447 s.
3. Vycinas Vincent. Earth and gods. An introduction to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1961. 328 p.
4. Shoven' tszetszy 说文解字 [Slovar' iz''yasneniya pis'men i tolkovaniya ieroglifov]. URL: (http://tool.httpcn.com/ShuoWen/). Data obrashcheniya: 13.09.2015.
5. Sviridova E.M. Sistemy filosofskikh kategorii v godyan'skikh rukopisyakh // Chelovek i kul'tura Vostoka. Issledovaniya i perevody 2008. M.: IDV RAN, 2009. 240 c.
6. Chzhunven' da tsydyan' 中文大词典 [Bol'shoi slovar' kitaiskogo yazyka]. Taibei, 1962-1968.
7. Gerasimova I.A. Logicheskie kvadraty. Polignozis, 2008, ¹3. S. 17-21.
8. Go I. Godyan' chzhutszyan' yui syan'tsin' syueshu sysyan 郭店竹简与先秦学术思想 [Sobranie godyan'skikh bambukovykh planok i dotsin'skaya nauchnaya mysl']. Shankhai, 2001. 859 s.
9. Needham J. Science and civilization in China. Vol.2. Camb., 1956. XXVIII, 318 p.
10. Aristotel'. Fizika. Kn.1 (A), gl.5. Soch. v 4-kh t. T.3. M.: Mysl', 1981. 614 s.
11. K probleme kategorii traditsionnoi kitaiskoi kul'tury: [materialy kruglogo stola] / uchastniki Kobzev A.I., Martynov A.S., Spirin V.S. i dr. // Narody Azii i Afriki. 1983. ¹3. S. 86-88.
12. «Velikii zakon» / Per. s kit. S. I. Kuchery // Drevnekitaiskaya filosofiya. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1972. 364 s.
13. Graham A.C. The Relation of Chinese Thought to the Chinese Language // Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1989. X, 502 p.
14. Neretina S.S., Ogurtsov A.P. Puti k universaliyam. Spb.: Izd. Russkoi Khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 2006. 1000 c.
15. Legge James. The Chinese Classics: With A Translation, Critical And Exegetical Notes, prolegomena, and copious indexes, in five volumes. Vol.3. Hong Kong : Legge ; London : Trubner, 1861—1872. XII, 735 p.
16. I tszin («Kniga peremen») / Per. s kit. A. Luk'yanova, Yu. Shchutskogo. Spb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2007. 304 s.
17. Aristotel'. O nebe. Kn.1 (A), gl.3 (20). Soch. v 4-kh t. T.3. M.: Mysl', 1981. 614 c.
18. Grane Marsel'. Kitaiskaya mysl' ot Konfutsiya do Lao-tszy. M.: Algoritm, 2008. 528 c.
19. Krushinskii A.A. Logika obrazovaniya ponyatii v drevnem Kitae // Vostok. 2006. ¹5. C. 5-22.
20. Rozhanskii I.D. Dve nauchnykh revolyutsii v Drevnei Gretsii // Nekotorye problemy istorii antichnoi nauki: sbornik nauchnykh rabot. L., 1989. 136 c.
21. Khaidegger Martin. Nitsshe. T 2. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2007. 458 c.
22. Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov / Per. s drevnegrecheskogo A.V. Lebedeva. M.: Nauka, 1989. 576 c.
23. Kant Immanuil. Iz pervogo izdaniya «Kritiki chistogo razuma». Prilozhenie // Kritika chistogo razuma. Minsk: Literatura, 1998. 960 c.
24. Rubets M.V. Kognitivnye osobennosti kitaiskoi kul'tury i yazyka // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1120 - 1133. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.11.10149.